@fakedansavage ("Dan Savage") retweeted:
@GraciDoesIT ("Graci Rhoads") wrote:
Just received @fakedansavage awesome straightforward and fun book for not only me but my 3 twenty something kids. Wish my mom told me shit that Dan talks about!!
@travisthetechie ("Travis Smith") retweeted:
@Imani_Barbarin ("Imani Barbarin, MAGC | Crutches&Spice ♿️") wrote:
One of the biggest failings of the Biden administration is the insistence that they’re governing in “normal times” none of that they say or do seems to match the urgency of a crumbling democracy, massive wealth inequality and a mass death/disabling event.
with quote tweet:
@mattbc ("Matthew "unwell anyway" Cortland, JD") wrote:
If you use the best measure of death we have, excess mortality, more than ~1 million people have been killed during the 2 years of the pandemic.
If you think what we need from the White House is "standard small talk" you're part of the problem https://twitter.com/mmahaffie/status/1482854784772288512
@alicegoldfuss ("bletchley punk") retweeted:
@rootpoint replied to a tweet by @alicegoldfuss:
@alicegoldfuss @FantasyMagazine This was fantastic. I havent read a really great original short story in a while and this really made my day. I look forward to reading more of your writing.
@withoutboats ("Saoirse Shipwreckt") retweeted:
@rsnous ("Omar Rizwan") wrote:
@RikerGoogling ("Riker Googling") wrote:
what are the six rules of klingon fight club
@AlanTudyk ("alan tudyk") retweeted:
@Survival ("Survival International") wrote:
⚠️ Bolsonaro’s government plots secret move against Indigenous peoples in #Brazil ⚠️
Just before New Year, Brazil’s Indigenous Affairs Agency drafted an internal memo, setting out a new policy to block any effort to protect Indig lands that aren’t yet officially demarcated.
1/6
@alicegoldfuss ("bletchley punk") replied to a tweet by @alicegoldfuss:
ME: *reading tweet replies* wow everyone is so excited about my qualifying story 😊
ME: wait no fuck
@alicegoldfuss ("bletchley punk") replied to a tweet by @alicegoldfuss:
the same thing happened with my original awards eligibility tweet and I completely forgot this time around
"I am eligible for X and Y" is how people offer their work for consideration
sorry again
@alicegoldfuss ("bletchley punk") replied to a tweet by @alicegoldfuss:
ohhh I think we ran into that tech/fiction terminology divide again
"I'm eligible for" == my work qualifies for nomination
"I've been nominated for" == I am a finalist for an awardI am not a finalist, but I *could be*
sorry for the confusion! I am less cool than you thought