
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
andysha@pounced-on.me wrote:
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
andysha@pounced-on.me wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
Techmeme@techhub.social wrote:
Reblogged by blithe ("Blithe"):
rochers ("Scott Rocher") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
clacke@libranet.de ("clacke: I'm still landing (yeah yeah yeah) 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
molly0xfff@hachyderm.io ("Molly White") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
molly0xfff@hachyderm.io ("Molly White") wrote:
rust@octodon.social ("Rust tips") wrote:
Have you moved to a shiny new M1/M2 Mac? Reinstall Rust.
Your old #Rustlang installation may be running emulated under Rosetta, and build for an Intel Mac instead of Apple Silicon. This mixup sometimes causes linker errors: "building for macOS-x86_64 but attempting to link with file built for macOS-arm64".
rustup self uninstall
https://rustup.rs
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
davbatz ("David Batz(DavBatz)") wrote:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
Truth
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
inthehands@hachyderm.io ("Paul Cantrell") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
drrimmer@aus.social ("Matthew Rimmer") wrote:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
a play on "Road Never Ends", from a rowdy bar song by Robert Earl Keen, a Texas
bluegrass singer and song-writer
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
apparently threats are enough to stop perfectly legal behavior:
"Walgreens, which said it came to this conclusion before the threats began, won’t dispense the drug in several G.O.P.-controlled states where abortion remains legal. There was a swift backlash"
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/opinion/walgreens-abortion-pill-attorneys-general-states.html
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
"found that the government had met the threshold for a special provision of the law known as the crime-fraud exception. That provision allows prosecutors to work around attorney-client privilege when they have reason to believe that legal advice or legal services have been used in furthering a crime."
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/us/politics/trump-lawyer-testify-documents.html
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Both Shadow DOM and Custom Element usage are now crazy high; nearly 20% of pageloads!
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/804
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/1689
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/804][5] ([remote][6])
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/1689][7] ([remote][8])
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Love how this post captures what I've called "standards preemption" -- the way that a minimally useful version of a feature that's baked in and widely supported eventually displaces userland alternatives, or at least shrinks their influence:
https://eisenbergeffect.medium.com/about-web-components-7b2a3ed67a78
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
thezoq2 ("TheZoq2") wrote:
Reblogged by anathema@girlcock.club:
hyenagirl64@beach.city ("⛧ Snowflower64 ⛧") wrote:
Reblogged by anathema@girlcock.club:
MnemosyneSinger@kolektiva.social ("Nemo (the happy leftist)") wrote:
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
paul@tapbots.social ("Paul Haddad :tapbots_logo:") wrote:
When is #California going to let me add my id to my Apple Wallet? https://learn.wallet.apple/id#states-list
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
breadandcircuses@climatejustice.social ("Bread and Circuses") wrote:
Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
kottke@botsin.space ("kottke.org") wrote:
Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
brouhaha ("🇺🇦 non-standard nerd") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
jk ("josef") wrote:
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
Getting married tomorrow!
Timestamps, a mess since 1970-01-01.
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
like for example one of your online friends might elicit the e-vocative "e-bro"
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
online terms of address are known as e-vocatives
Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io ("Thomas 🔭✨:verified:") wrote: