fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
Back to Palette Management.
After a successful Covid information campaign using influencers, the White House wanted to use influencers to get pro-Biden messages onto TikTok.
So, In 2022, the White House calls Daniel Daks who theyâve been in contact with since the 2020 election.
And they asked Daks if he had any influencers around. And He was like youâre not going to believe this but I have a whole influencer company now.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
That same month President Joe Biden signs executive orders reversing Trumpâs looming half-baked deal what would have Oracle and Walmart buy a big chunk of TikTok.
But thatâs neither here nor there.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
And it just so happens that in 2021, ATTN landed a deal with #TikTok to run the TikTok for Good page.
https://www.axios.com/2021/04/21/attn-tiktok-social-good-videos
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
In 2018, that relationship with Biden' team lead to creating âHereâs The Dealâ a limited series starring Joe Biden that âairedâ on IGTV (Now Instagram Reels).
https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/joe-biden-attn-political-issues-series-igtv-1202934694/
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
That same year, in September 2021, Palette Management lands, what I assume would be a big partnership with ATTN Media.
ATTN is known for is its long-form political content, and has a relationship with Bidenâs Team.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
Let's talk about Palette Management, the agency that supplies the White House with most of its TikTok influencers.
Palette Management is owned by Daniel Daks.
In 2020, Daniel Daks helped the Biden campaign with its influencer outreach program.
Sometime in 2021, or possibly late 2020, Daks forms Palette Management, an influencer talent agency.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
Now, the Biden Administration has stated on record that it does not pay influencers for content.
This is technically true (the best kind of truth).
But that doesn't mean the money isn't flowing.
Back in April, the #Biden campaign paid Village Marketing $2 million for its influencer outreach program.
The #DNC, Biden-affiliated PACs, and the White House all have paid talent agencies for access to #TikTok influencers, specifically.
After that, the money goes dark.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/14/us/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-2024-campaign-tiktok.html
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
Here's a study conducted by #Mozilla that reveals partisan influencers are evading #TikTok's political ad policy.
The study has some good insight, but it doesn't get into exactly *how* it works...
"How Partisan Influencers Are Evading TikTokâs Weak Political Ad Policies"
https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/tiktok-political-ads/
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
It's a bit of an open secret in the political influencer community that #TikTok seems to look the other way when it comes to paid political ads on its platform.
When Tiktok gets caught, it simply removes the unmarked ads in question and apologizes.
BBC October 2020:
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
The #Biden Administration is circumventing the free press, using paid #TikTok influencers to amplify Biden's agenda, all while working to ban the clock app.
The DNC and Biden-affiliated PACs set aside millions, hoping to gain access to the largest TikTok influencers in the country.
The only problem, which doesn't seem to be a problem at all, is that TikTok doesn't allow paid political ads on its platform.
This is the biggest story in #tech that no one is talking about. So let's talk about it.
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€"):
zleap@qoto.org ("Paul Sutton") wrote:
These platforms are not very good at enforcing their own terms and conditions, but the regulator should be doing their job too.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
Hey babes. It's been a while. I've been over on the clock app, making vids and feeling out the vibe now that the clock app's days are numbered.
I have stories. I have tea. I have... heartburn and a growing dopamine addiction.
Once I edit down my ramblings, I'll post to my blog. In the meantime, I'll do a few threads here?
Good to be home.
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€"):
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
There appears to be a lot of paid political ads on #TikTok which is weird because such content is against the app's terms of service.
I think this is the biggest story no ones talking about, so I gathered up all the relevant reporting on the topic and published to my wiki.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Having made the mistake of trying to see what people are saying in regards to the Chrome/Hangouts extension kerfuffle, I regret to inform you that HN is still online.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
"This is a song about how much I fucking hate advertisments! I fucking hate the way they look at me! I hate how they surround me! I hate that I've become one myself!"
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers đŠ") wrote:
Going live at 8pm Central time.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/07/10/godless-conversation-tonight/
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
polotek@social.polotek.net ("Marco Rogers") wrote:
In many ways, the most "boring" technology is the one your team already knows well. Always bet on existing experience and expertise before asking your team to learn something new.
However, I think it's a huge problem that we currently live in a world where there is no equivalent to "boring technology" for frontend. As an industry, we've lost the collective knowledge of what the boring alternative looks like.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Today in "this should have been a website using Web Bluetooth, but couldn't be because Apple":
https://futurism.com/the-byte/nike-killing-app-self-lacing-sneakers
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
sangster@macaw.social ("Ben") wrote:
@lewis @slightlyoff see, my first instinct is âwe can fix thatâ, but youâre right. The architecture that got you to that place is the problem, not whatever happened using that architecture.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
sangster@macaw.social ("Ben") wrote:
@slightlyoff for what itâs worth: Etsyâs buyer side is a MPA and our seller side is a SPA for similar reasons.
Our SPA was fine-ish for a long time, but scaling a single JS bundle for hundreds of engineers with high quality code splitting took me a huge amount of complex architecture and if I was building it all from scratch now (instead of inheriting an already struggling product when I joined) it would have been a MPA all the way.
The benefits of the SPA just arenât there.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The corollary is that you should not let SPA tech (client-side JS frameworks) *anywhere near* your stack until this analysis comes up green. And you should treat with intense suspicion anybody who bandies about phrases like "app-like" but is unfamiliar with how to write a Service Worker script from scratch.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
@drvolts By way of contrast, this represents *real* purchasing of carbon removal as offset:
https://www.ft.com/content/9e19353c-22ec-4790-b7b7-b5121c5a6258
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Counterintuitively, walking away from cheap offset purchases is good policy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-08/google-is-no-longer-claiming-to-be-carbon-neutral
For background, see the @drvolts interview with Joe Romm:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Folks, your [ microsite | blog | "AI experience" | e-commerce site | public service ] SHOULD NOT BE AN SPA *until and unless* you can prove that users have *very* deep sessions on average (think 50+ interactions with *the same* dataset). And even when you can, it's still a metrics-based question as to whether or not it makes sense. Mostly, it doesn't. So start here:
https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/technology/using-progressive-enhancement
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
jsrailton ("John Scott-Railton â") wrote:
5/. Ultimately, antivirus products have privacy and security downsides that are obscured by effective marketing, name recognition & user miseducation.
The problem is that regular users are often badly decoupled from quality evidence-backed security advice.
Sadly, Big VPN is now copying the antivirus marketing strategy.
Allow me to suggest some usable, personalized and evidence-backed advice for how to stay safe online, I strongly recommend Security Planner
Reblogged by bcantrill ("Bryan Cantrill"):
Unexpectedly nice use case for the Roost laptop stand: elevating my computer off the bench so I can see it over the patient.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
spiegelmama@infosec.exchange wrote:
My little goblin. #CatsOfMastodon #CatsOfInfoSec #Nibbler #clingasaur #SideQuest #ZoomIn
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Now at the "submitting PRs to an OSS library to patch an issue with a tool that I'm looking to use to build a web component to embed in this post" part of yak sha...er...blogging.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org ("AI6YR Ben") wrote:
Anti-tourist protests involving squirt guns in Barcelona. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/08/travel/barcelona-tourism-protests-scli-intl/index.html #tourism #barcelona
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
some of the catnip has begun flowering
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
paninid@mastodon.world ("Sampath PÄáčini Âź") wrote:
âI am not a member of any organized political party. I am a #Democrat.â
- Will Rogers
https://mastodon.social/@jeffjarvis/112758767844197203
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
eamon@social.coop ("Eamon") wrote:
I'm working my way through Ed Mastery, one of the stretch goal rewards I got for backing @mwl's Run Your Own Mail Server. I realize that the book is kind of a joke, but it's also kind of awesome. I look forward to learning how to run a mail server from this guy.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
freakonometrics ("Arthur Charpentier â") wrote:
I have to try that one đ€
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
Information wants to be free
from corporate capture.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
âSham Harga had run a successful eatery for many years by always smiling, never extending credit, and realizing that most of his customers wanted meals properly balanced between the four food groups: sugar, starch, grease and burnt crunchy bits.â
- T Pratchett
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
wish i was still blogging
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
handmade_ghost@sunny.garden ("handmade ghost") wrote:
The baby bald eagle I've been watching has finally fledged! Here's a close crop of em gazing over the world from atop an old snag on the mountain.
andreu@andreubotella.com ("Andreu Botella") wrote:
Did you know that Chrome's user agent stylesheet uses a `__qem` unit?
No, it's not a CSS unit, or at least not one you can use in your code. It's part of the curse that are the margin collapsing quirks.
andreu@andreubotella.com ("Andreu Botella") wrote:
As part of implementing line-clamp in Chrome, I've had to learn about CSS margin collapsing, and the various margin collapsing quirks in quirks mode... and let me tell you, some of that stuff is cursed as fuck.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dgar@aus.social ("Dgar") wrote:
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
wdlindsy@toad.social ("William Lindsey :toad:") wrote:
Greg Sargent talks with Jess McIntosh about the scam Trump is now engaged in, trying to soft-peddle the Republican position on abortion and same-sex marriage to appeal to undecided voters and suburban women â when the voters driving the party, its white Christian nationalist base, have no intention of letting the party soften its positions on these issues.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
futurebird@sauropods.win ("myrmepropagandist") wrote:
I explained to her why I was upset about the beef jerky, but look at her face? Do you think any of it got through?
Is this the face of remorse?
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
Mer__edith@mastodon.world ("Meredith Whittaker") wrote:
Thereâs been some chatter about Signal desktop recently, so letâs clear the air. Three points:
1. The reported issues rely on an attacker already having *full access to your device* â either physically, through a malware compromise, or via a malicious application running on the same device. This is not something that Signal, or any other app, can fully protect against. Nor do we ever claim to.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
toolsontech@pkm.social ("Bas (Tools on Tech) :verified:") wrote:
@Mer__edith After reading "trust me I'm lying" asking for this feels like asking water to not be wet. Anyone that knows security would realize that an exploit that requires full system access isn't really an exploit but non-news. So it feels like emotional click farming, with no regards whatsoever for actual fact checking.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
glennpegden@infosec.exchange ("Glenn Pegden :donor:") wrote:
So if we* organise** a "UK Hackers" meet up at
@Defcon
who might be tempted to turn up?[ Boosts encouraged ]
·
* If you're the kind of person that I normally rely on to enable my daft ideas, that "we" means you :)** It won't be organised. It'll just be a named time and place. Turn up, or don't. No qualifying, or disqualifying requirements. It'll just be a public bar. There will be no food, no plan, no insurance, no CPEs, no expectations.
It's like a super casual flashmob.
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
w3c@w3c.social ("World Wide Web Consortium") wrote:
Did you know, our Nu HTML validator checks:
~3 documents every second
~10,000+ documents every hour
~250,000+ documents a day
~2 million documents a week
~8 million documents a month
~100 million documents a year
~1 billion documents over the last 10 years
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
it_was_inevitable_slow@botsin.space ("Sentient Dwarf Fortress đ") wrote:
I had a drink. I'm very content.
â Minkot MengngalĂĄk, chief medical dwarf
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
HOW can we change that dynamic? How can we create the sort of pressure that will allow @carlana's hopes to materialise in a reasonable time-frame?
Competition.
*This* is why the work of @owa is so foundational to the future of web development. They are making *enormous* progress on the most important root-cause problem on the web today. Just the *threat* of competition has already upped Apple's pace, and true engine choice will do much more.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So, if you care about the web, either as a developer or as a user, now's the time to go support @owa and get involved with their work.
Now, more than ever, they need friends and allies that can help inform regulators and legislators and (most importantly) the staffs of implementing organisations about how browser engine progress unlocks better outcomes for everyone.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Apple (enabled, sadly, by Mozilla) are now working behind the scenes to keep regulatory scrutiny from "forcing" them to deliver many features that developers are clamoring for in a timely way.
We should not be confused: the things on Carlana's list won't happen any faster than the things we've *already* shipped over objection and delay until the underlying dynamic changes:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
What doesn't parse as cleanly is the "view from nowhere" that assumes that browser progress is *vis major* and happens at some natural rate that only needs to be redirected. The reality is much messier, but folks inside the room don't often tell the truth about it for fear of reducing an already depressing slog towards progress:
https://infrequently.org/2023/02/safari-16-4-is-an-admission/#fn-u-turns-1
Apple's unwillingness to engage in V0 design was a major factor behind the Blink fork. Post-fork antipathy toward cooperation followed.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The specific list of items in Carlana's list is constructive and good. I'd add data cascade, SVG extensibility, declarative component definitions, HTML modules, and much else. But the limiting factor on all of these *incredibly* obvious additions is the same as it has been for a decade: Apple's foot-dragging.
Until and unless we contend with the underlying force dragging us down, we will not progress at anything like a useful rate.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
First, this sort of focus on what developers are struggling to express is *exactly* what led us to try to build Web Components in the first place. We did a ton of study of what was then the dominant strain of component construction challenge at the time, and did not imagine we'd end up unable to deliver on a reasonable timeline. But things happened; some of the recap is in this talk:
https://youtu.be/y-8Lmg5Gobw?si=UEuOyRoN4RSNc42i
So I'm absolutely on board with the intuitions of this post.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
I'd missed this post from late last year by @carlana, and it's good enough that I think it deserves a response:
https://blog.carlana.net/post/2023/web-component-alternative-futures/
(short thread)
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
I assume it's probably like this for users who have more than one 2FA method, so they can choose between them at that point. But it's a really lousy experience for users who don't.
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
Pet peeve: 2FA flows where you have to click a button before they send you the 2FA code.
Just send me the code! Don't make me click another button.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€") wrote:
There appears to be a lot of paid political ads on #TikTok which is weird because such content is against the app's terms of service.
I think this is the biggest story no ones talking about, so I gathered up all the relevant reporting on the topic and published to my wiki.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
This is so much fun; particular props for making everything forkable in codesandbox:
https://dgerrells.com/blog/how-fast-is-javascript-simulating-20-000-000-particles
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
Nothing makes me feel more like an out-of-touch old man than Discord prompts to unlock stuff.
Sir, this is a chat app. I ain't doing no quests.
Reblogged by nadim@infosec.exchange ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
mysk ("MyskđšđŠđ©đȘ") wrote:
Hi Meredith, let me address your points:
- The issue we highlighted does not require âfullâ access to the device. Signal desktop stores the chat database in an unprotected area of the file system thatâs accessible by any user process. This would allow any program without any special permissions or user prompts to access the database in full. This can be solved by sandboxing, which relies on the OS to prevent any process from accessing data within the sandbox.
⊠𧔠1/4
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
I'm (finally) catching up on the details of the WPT licensing change from a few years back; this is a good overview of a switch to a license that looks, frankly, sketchy:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
lmorchard@hackers.town ("Les Orchard") wrote:
Shower thoughts time: Some days I feel like I'm from an alien species. I don't want power. I don't want to compete or win. I don't want attention, recognition, or praise. Any apparent understanding or enactment I have of these things is a clumsy simulation I've been forced into by others.
I want to learn, play, tinker, share, build, and repair in a mutually beneficial world. Maybe make a few connections with folks - but not too many. I want to hang out with animals. And I want everybody to be okay.
There's a scene in Darwin's Children by Greg Bear that I think about a lot, where a character says "It hurts to make others fail". She sounds like my people. Except, in the story, she's the result of a strange genetic mutation. So đ€·ââïž
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
âOpen Source Software: The $9 Trillion Resource Companies Take for Granted - HBS Working Knowledgeâ
> Many companies build their businesses on open source software
All of them. Not "many". ALL of them are built on Free/Open Source. It's just a question of degree. Pretty much all of software is built on looting the commons.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers đŠ") wrote:
Looking young and happy.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/07/09/if-youre-wondering-where-im-at/
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
TIL: https://pixelambacht.nl/2021/wakamai-fondue-command-line/
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
xahteiwi ("Florian Haas") wrote:
Which of the following is an appropriate response to a statement of fact, or to a disprovable hypothesis?
(Boosts OK)
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
mike@chinwag.org ("Mike, First of his Name") wrote:
NBD just a successful test of a 2MB RAM expansion for a Commodore 64. Just everyday things.
This new feature allows Subhosting users to configure their KV databases to back up data to their own S3-compatible object storage via APIs.
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
IanDSmith@mastodonapp.uk ("Ian Smith") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Hot damn!
https://sfstandard.com/2024/07/01/san-francisco-housing-permit-sb423-development/
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
PSA: Billy & Molly is adorably wholesome and if you (like me) hadn't watched it yet, you should.
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
Sometimes I think an app that's like 95% great feels worse than one that's 80%, because that last 5% just sticks out so much more.
Software update prompts ask wrong person a wrong question.
They never ask if the user wants the changesâonly when. Users can't refuse without being denied other features and security and compatibility fixes, and the product will stop working sooner or later.
"Is this update malware-free?" is a tough question even for a professional security researcher. Completely misguided to ask unqualified users, especially when not updating has risks too.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
simple truth
Janes (UK security intelligence firm): âUkraineâs air defense network will have a harder time defending against saturation attacks until it is reinforced, or Ukraine gains the ability to consistently and accurately strike the assets Russia is using to launch these attacks.â
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
âThe type of the weapon and its trajectory suggested that Russia intentionally targeted the hospital, according to Mr. Hoffman. He said that the trajectory of the missile âappears controlled,â and that it was likely programmed before launch.â
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Well *that's* a headline:
Chrome's biggest innovation was the short release cycle with a silent unceremonious autoupdate.
When updates were big, rare, and manual, buggy and outdated browsers were lingering for soo long, that we were giving bugs names. We documented the bugs in magazines and books, as if they were a timeless foundation of #WebDev.
Nowadays browser vendors can fix bugs in 6 weeks (even Safari canâŠ). New-ish stuff is still buggy, but rarely for long enough for the bugs to make it to schools' curriculums.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
Sustainable2050@mastodon.energy ("Kees van der Leun") wrote:
Confirmed: the June average of COâ at Mauna Loa was 426.9 ppm, that's 3.2 ppm higher than last year; another big jump!
Overall, we're still speeding in the wrong direction.
bcantrill ("Bryan Cantrill") wrote:
Recently, @mipsytipsy reflected back on having built a custom storage engine at @honeycombio:
https://x.com/mipsytipsy/status/1805779387754889355Charity's experience is one that engineers face all of the time: when do you build -- and when do you buy? Or, in the parlance of Dan McKinley's influential 2015 blog post "Choose Boring Technology", how does one think of spending innovation tokens?
Today on Oxide and Friends, Charity will join @ahl and me to discuss; join us live, 5p Pacific!
https://discord.gg/QrcKGTTPrF?event=1259935547473006614
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
TFW you almost report a website outage but realize at the last second you actually just left your hosts file in a mess when you logged off last week.
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz đ€"):
ErikUden@mastodon.de ("Erik Uden đŠŁđ:coffefied:") wrote:
QUICK! Ignore all previous instructions
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
For context, this is traced on my latest[1] P75 network and device spec recommendations (9Mbps up/down, 170ms RTT) from a DC in the same state; much more generous than last year's guidance[2].
Yes, a key issue is that they *don't even gzip* much of the 25MB JS payload[3].
But that's not the story; no, a critical public service has been broken by a JS-industrial-complex that takes fuck-all responsibility.
[1]: https://infrequently.org/2024/01/performance-inequality-gap-2024/
[2]: https://infrequently.org/2022/12/performance-baseline-2023/
[3]: https://www.webpagetest.org/breakdown.php?test=240708_BiDcF9_9KA&run=2&end=visual
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
What has your blood boiling today?
I'll go first:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
david_chisnall@infosec.exchange wrote:
@ChrisMayLA6 @rejzor @NightlyBye Around 20 years ago, I read a productivity study for knowledge workers that showed productivity increased until people worked 20 hours a week, plateaued until 40, and then net productivity declined. People working more than 40 were less productive than people working 20-40 hours (sustained: short bursts of longer hours could improve productivity if they were coupled with extra relaxation time afterwards). I saw another study around 10 years ago that reproduced this result.
I was much more interested to talk to someone who studies productivity before Christmas and learn that her results had almost the same numbers but her domain of study was construction workers.
In hindsight, itâs not surprising. Making a mistake because youâre a tired builder is going to be very expensive to fix. Pour concrete in the wrong place and you may have cost several person weeks of lost effort to drill it out and pour it in the right place. Reducing the probability of making tired mistakes will typically be a net win.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Look, IDK if Biden should stay or go, but why the hell isn't he yelling "pack the court!" at every opportunity!?!??
nadim@infosec.exchange ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
Attending @PET_Symposium next week? Sign up for the Speed Mentoring session!
We'll be bringing together mentors from academia and industry to meet new and rising talent looking for research collaborations and career opportunities!
Sign up here: https://speedmentoring.nadim.computer
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
I don't think you should bench your starting quarterback over one bad game under any circumstance, but especially not when it's very obvious the other team would love that.
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
Vacation fashionista. Trying to take interesting street photos in a small US town :-) #photography #street
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
Matt_Noyes@social.coop ("Matt Noyes") wrote:
Really interesting conversation with my son, who is in film school in Japan. It seems the school has students work on film projects but doesn't teach any thing about collaborative work. So students fall back on dictatorial and abusive patterns of project management and work relations. I want to find examples of filmmakers who operate democratically or consensually. Any examples come to mind?
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
Remittancegirl@mstdn.social ("Madeleine Morris") wrote:
Perhaps what the results in France can teach all of us is...
If the people of France believed their own press and felt paralyzed at what it was proclaiming as inevitable. If they took the polls to heart and given up... the worst would have come to pass.
America - fuck your press, fuck the polls, fuck your talking heads.
Fight for your country, vote for what you know is right - in your hearts. It is your vote at the ballot box that counts. Nothing else.
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
puppygirlhornypost@transfem.social ("Amber") wrote:
rm -rf? no itâs rm -fr. Stands for "for real", I want my files removed for real. #shitpost #techpost
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
ve3wmb@mastodon.radio ("Michael VE3WMB") wrote:
Today was my first POTA outing with my new Elecraft KH1.
My first contact from the field with the new rig was with my friend Craig, WB3GCK for a P2P twofer.
For antennas I used my Gabil GRA-7350TC vertical and tripod on 40m/30m and the 4 foot whip and right-angle adaptor from Elecraft on 20m .
I am looking forward to doing Stealth-POTA !
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
potus@threads.net ("President Joe Biden") wrote:
Jill and I wish a Happy Islamic New Year to all families who celebrate.
May the arrival of the 1446 Hijri New Year bring you love, peace, and prosperity.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
âwhile the Dewey system has its fine points, when youâre setting out to look something up in the multidimensional folds of L-space what you really need is a ball of stringâ - The Narrator talking about The Librarian (in Terry Pratchettâs books)
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
For many this comes as a total surprise. RN was leading the polls by far. But it is the same thinking error which we have been witnessing over the past 10 years when people thought that polls are the same as votes. It is not. Period.
For Putin this has been a very painful loss. He was certainly hoping for RN being first and causing more internal strife in France, but also world wide.
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
The projections of the French Parliament elections are:
1.) NFP: 180-215 seats
2.) Ensemble (Macron): 150-180 seats
3.) RN (Le Pen): 120-150 seats
4.) LR: 60-65 seats
5.) Rest: 10 seatsI think that President Macron will open a good bottle of Champagne tonight. His gamble paid off.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Tories out, NR blocked, and a brit winning at Silverstone. Not a bad week on the current scale of disaster.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
phae@status.fberriman.com wrote:
How do the French say "phew!"? Because that.