Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mementomaori@kind.social wrote:
Wtf did trans folk ever do to you.
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mementomaori@kind.social wrote:
Wtf did trans folk ever do to you.
Boosted by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·"):
vitalis@dirtyknight.life wrote:
Boosted by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·"):
lacybarry@climatejustice.social ("madame poolhair") wrote:
π»π΅οΈπΌβοΈπͺ»
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
munin@infosec.exchange ("Fi π³οΈββ§οΈ") wrote:
A'ight. The whole vibecoding thing deserves a chance to prove itself.
So here's something that I haven't seen done sufficiently well by regular coders; if AI is truly that much more innovative, it shouldn't have any problem.
One of the problems with compute is the whole billing and scheduling thing - a lot of places have specific cost-per-hour to run batch processing; a lot of large enterprises have complex pipelines that need scheduling in order to interleave things that need processing with resources available to process them.
So a vibe coder who's confident they can prove themselves could create a utility that can look at a given program's binary, analyze it, and determine how long it will take to run, and calculate the cost to run it. Do this within 1% of actual and you'll have a truly innovative new product.
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
netopwibby@social.coop ("netop://γ¦γ£γ") wrote:
Gorillaz released a hand-drawn animation/music video, giving The Jungle Book vibes. Very nice.
Boosted by jwz:
mwichary@mastodon.online ("Marcin Wichary") wrote:
A very good use of Gorton.
pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers π·") wrote:
I'm home from work early. You know what that means, boys & girls? I get to spend a few hours talking to the unresponsive bots who constitute Bluehost's customer assistance department.
Can I learn to hate AI even more? Yes, I can.
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were βπ§π±β"):
mothninja@beige.party ("Anna") wrote:
Good morning
Let Friction Ring.
Dear Lazyweb, I have this pulley wheel, 50mm inside diameter, 4mm groove. I need a rubber traction ring to go inside it. I cannot find anyone who will sell this to me. The ring must be flat or concave, not round like a typical...
https://jwz.org/b/yk33
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
Handdrawn 2D animation! I repeat, handdrawn 2D animation! This is what they took from us. #Gorillaz - The Mountain, The Moon Cave and The Sad God
keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri") wrote:
Not enough chatting about this!
soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:
Dear @photomatt how do I turn this off? I never asked for this. I do not want this.
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
errant@glaceon.social ("Errant :is: :bat:") wrote:
It's weird how "crimes against nature" is understood to mean some sort of perceived sexual deviancy, instead of, say, destroying the biosphere for profit
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
Everytime the curtain gets pulled back, and we see how powerful people use the internet against us, it's alway far-right, white supremacist ideals and conspiracies. Or, on the other side, it's pushing to keep neoliberalism alive.
But talk to a corporate Dem, and they believe with all their heart that every leftist is a Russian troll.
Powerful people aren't weaponizing the internet to spread leftist ideals just so we accidentally get universal healthcare.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
Jeffrey Epstein was a white supremacist who donated thousands of dollars to white supremacist influencers during the Ferguson protests.
Epstein had multiple conversations expressing concern over race riots/wars with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
Epstein was also influential in resurrecting /polβa 4chan forum that became of the most influential far-right hubs, spreading conspiracies and white supremacist ideals.
Steve Bannon, crypto, ... what the fuck.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/behind-the-bastards/id1373812661?i=1000751725194
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
Also, I decided that GIFS are cool again.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropicβs red lines in Pentagon fight:
"OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote in a memo to staff that he will draw the same red lines that sparked a high-stakes fight between rival Anthropic and the Pentagon: no AI for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons." https://www.axios.com/2026/02/27/altman-openai-anthropic-pentagon
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:
I'm asking because I honestly can't imagine a solution to this particular problem that is both:
- User friendly
- Acceptable to privacy advocates
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:
Okay, obviously Persona is terribad. There is a real problem to address here though: how are organizations supposed to perform reasonable identity verification at a distance? Sophisticated impersonation attacks hit customer support lines every day. We need a reasonable defense against this.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
THE DONT FUCKING USE AI AS A WAR STRATEGIST
We've really fallen hard for the "inevitability of AI" propaganda. Journalists, especially.
A trained parrot would also sometimes recommend nuclear war if we allowed it to run our military. It's not news because we simply don't use trained parrots for war.
This is only news because no one is asking these companies and our government why we must use AI for war.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
From The Intercept: Protest #ICE, Go To Jail.
This is why we don't post photos of protesters' faces or other identifying marks. This is why we don't "RSVP" to protests.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz β€οΈ π» βοΈ π₯ π΅π·") wrote:
Instagram keeps getting caught serving sexually suggestive videos by young women/girls to men. And as a society we sort of just accept it?
Like, we know what Adam Mosseri is doing. He's trying to keep that average time on site metric alive by being a big weirdo creep.
And now, we have millions of people who when they hear "Fediverse" they think- that thing Adam Mosseri used to talk about on Threads. Like, he's the face for some people.
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
mhoye@cosocial.ca wrote:
Strip mining the cultural commons so it can be synthesized and sold back to us, claiming it's all inevitable, these guys really are The Borg, aren't they.
stray thought:
I've heard of the term "Software Engineer" referred to as being "stolen glory", because engineering as a practice has long had MUCH higher standards than software development, when it came to reliability/quality/etc, because the stakes were usually so much higher, and the study required for qualification were correspondingly high.
LLMs seem to be leaning on this further: Software developers have embraced the idea that we can spit out any low-quality, unreliable, even straight-up dangerous garbage that, as long as it seems somewhat productive, is "valuable enough". They have dropped the floor on what we're able to achieve while deskilling many of us who at least were developing the skills required for quality production. Most importantly, they're making it so leadership actively discourages taking the actual time to make sure something won't fucking kill someone.
I was looking at a certain open source project's page and there was a link to its associated consultancy. On the front page was a gif of a prompt for an app generator LLM utility, and the first fucking prompt that showed up was "Write me an application that will act as an X-ray analyzer, looking for anomalies and reporting on them", and that was just obviously the most fucking irresponsible thing I'd seen all day. Imagine having some non-expert just write something that will put people's actual lives on the line like that, and sell it as if it has any qualification to make reliable diagnostics. This is the level of brazen irresponsibility we're dealing with.
denschub@schub.social ("Dennis Schubert") wrote:
Update: This project was just archived on GitHub. Apparently, just having GenAI fix all your bugs and do all the work isn't working, huh?
Shocker. Real shocker.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:
I won't volunteer to be a moral crumple zone.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
"Objects not data: a photography and illustration print experiment"
https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2026/objects-not-data-art-prints/
> Over the next few months, Iβll be experimenting with selling art and photography prints as a way to fund my work on this newsletter
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
Objects not data: a photography and illustration print experiment: https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2026/objects-not-data-art-prints/
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Hot tip: don't use the spicy auto complete to do anything critical, like, I don't know, tell you if you're having a medical emergency
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
finnmyrstad@eupolicy.social ("Finn LΓΌtzow-Holm Myrstad") wrote:
βHave you noticed that digital products and services are getting worse? So have we!
β‘οΈWe have published a report about enshittification, on how and why digital products and services keep getting worse - and how we can turn the trend (hint: open tech, enforcement, public policy++)
Obviously @pluralistic is a big inspiration and help in this work.
More than 80 groups in Europe and the US has joined in a call to action.
More here: www.forbrukerradet.no/breakingfree
Enjoy this short film!