Twitter Feed: Posts

@ewarren ("Elizabeth Warren") wrote:

You want to bring down the cost of child care, prescription drugs, and housing? Then you want to pass the #BuildBackBetter Act.

@DaveHolmes ("Dave Holmes") wrote:

This is exactly what you need to read today, courtesy of @ohJuliatweets: https://www.gawker.com/celebrity/in-defense-of-shame

@DaveHolmes ("Dave Holmes") wrote:

They’re doing ‘90s Day on @BBC6Music and if you tune in right now (6:23am pacific), in 2 mins you will hear the crowd at a Pennywise show chanting in a PERFECT San Diego accent. Pen. Ny. WOZ! Pen. Ny. WOZ!

@33mhz ("Bernie Mid-Off") wrote:

did MIA drop a new single

with quote tweet:

@catholicdad420 ("rob 🇩🇴") wrote:

Emily in The Hague
Emily in Crimea
Emily in Sarajevo
Emily in Tripoli
Emily in Hargeisa
Emily in Langley
Emily in disputed Western Sahara

@DaveHolmes ("Dave Holmes") wrote:

I’m one of these people now, and I love it. Wordle 208 5/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟨🟨⬜🟩
⬜🟨⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

@RussellGlasser ("Russell Glasser 💙") wrote:

Mobile game ads:

"Here are some numbers! Only 1% of players have enough IQ to pick the largest one!"

(A cursor picks the smallest number)

"FAIL!"

(A cartoon character is graphically tortured to death.)

@dorrismccomics ("Alex Norris") wrote:

@olensmar ("Ole Lensmar") retweeted:

@bioslikk ("Bruno Lopes") wrote:

If run Kubernetes you may want to checkout Testkube for your integration tests. You can check it out at https://github.com/kubeshop/testkube
also, if are curious about it’s technical implementation this blog post does a good wrap up on that https://thenewstack.io/testkube-a-new-approach-to-cloud-native-testing/

@RikerGoogling ("Riker Googling") wrote:

how to fuck around without finding out

@RachelAppel ("Rachel Appel") replied to a tweet by @RachelAppel:

I don't care if you're from , Americans need to learn what real cheese is.

@RachelAppel ("Rachel Appel") wrote:

If it's not from the Gruyères region, then it's just sparkling cheese.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/12/business/gruyere-cheese-us-court-ruling.html

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

To be clear, it's still bizarre that NM & PA Republicans did this. They weren't real electors and they were never going to be, short of a coup.

But in each of those states, someone took time to break the template and soften the... uh... outright forgery part of it.

How come?

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

All credit to @weareoversight for their seminal work here!

And to @nicholaswu12 at politico and all the other reporters running this to ground, especially @ruelaswritings in AZ.

@ZcohenCNN and @MarshallCohen had a great piece on this last night at CNN.

Lots more to figure out.

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Unlike the other five states, those key changes from NM and PA make clear (with unique language for each state) that their weirdo assertions about being electors were actually contingent on the eventuality that it might someday be determined that they were the real electors.

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

The key change in the Pennsylvania document says

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, on the understanding that if, as a result of a final non-appealable Court Order or other proceeding prescribed by law, we are ultimately recognized as being the duly elected and qualified Electors..."

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's the key change in the New Mexico document:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, on the understanding that it might later be determined that we are the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President... from the State of New Mexico, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

In those two other states, that key paragraph bluntly asserting these people were "the duly elected and qualified electors... from the state of X" (when in fact they were not!) is changed. And qualified.

The two states are: New Mexico and Pennsylvania.

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

You can see that all five look exactly alike.

That said! Republicans in 2 other states also sent in similar documents. Formatting, spacing, font and most of the language in the documents are the same as the others.

Their weird documents were also sent to the Archives.

But!...

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's Wisconsin:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Wisconsin, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's Michigan:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Michigan, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's Nevada:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Nevada, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's Georgia:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Georgia, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

Here's the nut graf language, for example, from the Arizona document:

"WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Arizona, do hereby certify the following:"

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") replied to a tweet by @maddow:

In 5 states (at least) - AZ, GA, NV, MI, WI - Republicans sent in fake electoral slates that looked quite alike: Same font, spacing, formatting, and language. The similarity suggests a coordinated effort or that, at least, they were all working from the same document template.

@maddow ("Rachel Maddow MSNBC") wrote:

Short(ish) thread on one interesting detail concerning the bizarre falsified elector documents Republicans sent in to the National Archives in various Biden-won states after the 2020 election, falsely asserting that those states had chosen Republican/Trump electors:

@RachelAppel ("Rachel Appel") retweeted:

@kskrygan ("Kirill Skrygan") wrote:

For more information about our Remote Development offerings, please visit:
https://www.jetbrains.com/remote-development/

Also, the architectural overview can be found here:
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/2021.3/remote-development-overview.html

@Extrawurst ("Stephan D.") retweeted:

@JustinBeckwith ("Justin Beckwith") wrote:

Calling all rustaceans! 🦀 We're looking for an experienced Rust engineer to come help us build the open source Google Cloud Rust SDK. Come work with us! https://careers.google.com/jobs/results/99961170103804614-senior-software-engineer-client-libraries-rust/

@33mhz ("Bernie Mid-Off") wrote:

very interested to see what god-tier man she digs up next

with quote tweet:

@rosiesrambles ("Roseanne A. New Year's Baby Brown 👶🏿🎇") wrote:

lisa bonet was really married to both lenny kravitz and jason momoa in the same lifetime

God, I see what you have done for others-

@gM__82 ("Gabriel") retweeted:

@mikes_hardest_ ("alex") wrote:

me when the doordash person knocks instead of just leaving the food there

@RachelAppel ("Rachel Appel") retweeted:

@DrakeGatsby ("jon drake") wrote:

Dear Santa,
You didn’t get me the thesaurus I asked for and now I’m mad. You made me really mad. I’m mad at you.