Twitter Feed
@gaywonk ("Carlos Maza") retweeted:
@awalkerinLA ("Alissa Walker") wrote:
From the look of this document, which didn’t take me very long to read at all, the “interests considered” include requiring ADA compliance, daylighting bus stops, and making these supposedly public amenities function like actual public spaces https://sf.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/Shared%20Spaces%20Manual%20DRAFT%2020210813.pdf
with quote tweet:
@ezraklein ("Ezra Klein") wrote:
This is like a parody of liberal governance. 60 pages of rules to keep parklets that the city encouraged restaurants to build.
Every interest considered except the one that the law was supposed to achieve - letting a successful experiment continue. https://www.sfchronicle.com/food/restaurants/article/S-F-restaurants-are-tearing-down-their-parklets-16680270.php