Mastodon Feed: Posts

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

I know y'all are nerds (non-derogatory) but please do keep in mind that one of my goals with converging on a term to use consistently is making my writing easily comprehensible by a large audience. I am talking about the crud that we all have to talk about all the time now, and I want to be as congruent as possible with common usage without unnecessarily contributing to hype

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Bonus round!

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Style guide question: how to consistently refer to the umbrella of generative AI, including LLMs and diffusion image/audio generators?

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
wachoperro@rebel.ar ("Wachoperro") wrote:

@davidgerard
Speedrun: Prompt injection into Bluesky outage%

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
Grouchybeast ("The Grouchybeast") wrote:

@davidgerard The otherwise great paper on LLMs hallucinating images in image analysis benchmarking made me facepalm when they used ChatGPT to assess some of the output. WHAT ARE YOU DOING? LLMS MAKE THINGS UP WHEN ASKED TO ANALYSE DATA! THAT IS LITERALLY THE ENTIRE THESIS OF YOUR PAPER!

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
zkat@fedi.zkat.tech ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:

I'm really really liking GTS so far, dang. I'll give it a few days and then do a migration, I guess. Feel free to follow this account. I'm going to be posting primarily from here and boosting from toot.cat for now.

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
zkat@fedi.zkat.tech ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:

lfggggggg
https://boriken.social/@Iusef/116445255501902770

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
zkat@fedi.zkat.tech ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:

new, highly-relevant header image just dropped.

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
zkat@fedi.zkat.tech ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:

can someone remind me what I need to do so people's posts and accounts actually show up for me when using a single-person instance? Cause I keep going to accounts and they say "0 posts"...

neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik") wrote:

And the code is now live! https://source.tube/neatnik/php-ircv3-filehost

It works, but still hasn’t been tested exhaustively, and definitely needs some more thought put into the list of allowed file types.

I’ll soon update my IRC guide (https://www.neatnik.net/setting-up-an-irc-server/) with detailed instructions on how to get this up and running on Ergo IRC servers.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

take up smoking or die in a plane crash -- AI Bertrand Russell

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

please enjoy this old documentary about the winscale reactor disastor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOgSlFkv71U

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

you do not eat 7 spiders during your lifetime - they don't want to crawl in there

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
zkat@fedi.zkat.tech ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:

this is actually really fucking good. I'm loving @gotosocial already.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

if god wanted us to believe in sets, he wouldn't have only given us cons cells to work with.

neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik") wrote:

Doing a super brief livestream to wrap this up and put the code in a public repo. https://tv.neatnik.net

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

deepfake chopra

😂

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

rumour has it that ukraine has started deploying graphite bombs with drones in occupied ukraine.

graphite bombs are a nonlethal munition where they basically drop graphite strings over power infrastructure and let shorts take out the system. the idea behind graphite weapons is to take out power for a short while while you attack and watch everything fall apart without grid power.

they're traditionally deployed by fighter jets and cruise missiles, that sort of thing. and if the rumours are true, ukraine has brought them down to drone costs.

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
cloudhop@equestria.social ("Erik McClure") wrote:

god if this isn't a summary of everything pissing me off these days I don't know what is https://aria.dog/barks/every-platform-is-hitler/ (from @woof )

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

the vehicles that were delivered were riddled with bugs - broken traction systems, engine fires and doors that flew off at high speeds

okay two of these are not bugs, they are the sound of people getting fired for sheer incompetence wtf?!

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

deadlines were so tight there was no time to design a prototype

gee, i wonder why this went wrong

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
joshsusser@autistics.life ("josh susser") wrote:

so we're calling AI imitations of people "sloppelgangers" now, right?

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
brennen@federation.p1k3.com wrote:

computers were always tools of oppression.

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
paco@infosec.exchange ("Paco Hope") wrote:

More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos. Now #mozilla's CTO has come out with a detail-free, hyperbole-laden blog post.

I can't get anything below the surface level on this blog post. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.

• The blog post itself contains no links or references (except a link to a prior blog post)
• The Firefox 150 release notes has zero mentions of #Claude, #Anthropic, or Mythos.
• The security advisories in Firefox 150 lists 41 bugs
  • Anthropic is credited exactly 3 times.
  • The blog post says This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation
  • it is not clear why the blog says 271, the release lists 41 issues, and only 3 acknowledge Anthropic
• I've tried looking on Mozilla's bugzilla and I have no access to any bug that is named in those release notes. I can't even see the conversation, much less the code change.

How is someone supposed to put this blog post's claims into context?

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

Got it, we we won't show this again

Yeah I could have sworn you said that last time, and yet...

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

happy earth day.

of the planets i know about, earth is the one i'd most like to live on.

Boosted by adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁!"):
dillo@fosstodon.org ("Dillo browser") wrote:

Introducing the Dillo Lab, a new section in our website for experimental ideas and features.

https://dillo-browser.org/lab/

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

Linus twat tips: i should have invested more in fascist notebooks

Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
homegrown@social.growyourown.services ("Grow Your Own Services 🌱") wrote:

Mastodon servers can optionally be run in "limited federation mode", also known as "allowlist mode" or "isolated mode".

In that mode the server doesn't communicate at all with any other servers, unless the admin has specifically added a server to their "allowlist".

Isolated servers are much safer but less busy, and generally created by admins who want to make a private network rather than be part of a larger social network. More info at:

🌱 https://fedi.tips/creating-an-isolated-server

#MastoAdmin #SelfHosting

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

let me chatgpt that for you doesn't need to exist like let me google that for you did because people think they're the best at prompt engineering and won't trust anyone else to do it properly.

and like they're pretty sure it knows better than the experts anyway.