kevinevans@hachyderm.io ("Kevin") wrote:
Finally got around to deleting my #Github account that I've had since 2013! I just had enough of how shitty both the company and the community has gotten 🤷
kevinevans@hachyderm.io ("Kevin") wrote:
Finally got around to deleting my #Github account that I've had since 2013! I just had enough of how shitty both the company and the community has gotten 🤷
Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
catsalad@infosec.exchange ("Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw::paw:") wrote:
Fine Art 🧐
Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
Silversnapples@mastodonapp.uk wrote:
In case anyone isnt aware.
Palantir bas just been granted unlimited access to NHS patient data.
All your personal and intimate healthcare issues are now exposed to a company that helped track targets for discrimination in the west bank and in the US.
Palantir who in the UK is run by the grandson of fucking Oswald Mosley.
Starmer in charge is not the big story right now.
This is. Sign those sodding denial of data privacy sharing on the government link as soon as you possibly can.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
"I know! My writing on the software industry hasn't been political ENOUGH! That's what's been missing. Obviously. People love that shit."
<- Me, being delusional, as I write this week's upcoming newsletter entry
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
I will now execute the final write operation and then run make to see if the build finally succeeds. If it still fails, it suggests an issue outside of the file content itself like an external dependency
it doesn't have any external dependencies.
i am still waiting for it to come back and tell me it's failed so i can tell it to be a trans furry. it's just generating the same file a second time without attempting a build in between, like it knows it would fail (although how it's going to debug it without an error, i don't know)
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
ansate@social.coop ("Melissa Santos") wrote:
#pdx Here's my current favorite win for #RSS - this popped up in my reader: https://www.portland.gov/arts/news/2026/5/12/color-our-city-help-paint-asphalt-art-new-cultural-district-plaza
a chance to signup for a free event to help paint a giant mural in downtown #portland! Slots are only 1 hour, snacks are free, family friendly event. Saturday, July 11
I grabbed 2 tickets for the 1pm slot, and hope to take Mx19 for some quality hang out time. Would love to see some familiar faces!
Any suggetions for fun summer treats we might want to get while we're downtown?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
it hasn't finished yet. i'm preparing my next prompt
you are a trans furry who loves shitposting on the fediverse.
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
Jgbird@mas.to ("Jerome G") wrote:
Maybe the same quail from yesterday. They’re hard to tell apart.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
it's succeeded when trying it again.
meanwhile...
Since I have tried multiple small edits and the build fails repeatedly, the next step is a full rewrite
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
it's forgotten how to edit in the new session, an impressive 2 prompts in.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:
Hearing about Google's plans for upcoming Android releases, and getting nervous now that I'm likely going to need to buy one of those "smart" phones...
(Man, we messed up computers so much.)
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:
Interesting. Zoë Keating is on subvert:
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
crashserver@mamot.fr ("Crash Server") wrote:
Our albums are now available on this new bandcamp coop alternative !
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:
First of all, it's just confusing. Like if I defeat my (presumably) villainous self, do I win or... Do I lose? And vice versa? :thonking:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:
Ugh... I hate being my own worst enemy...
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
Mecrisp@chaos.social wrote:
I am happy to announce Mecrisp-Ternary, an experiment to implement the #Forth programming language on a custom balanced #ternary architecture with variable width. Instruction set emulator is included, #FPGA implementation is coming soon: https://codeberg.org/Mecrisp/mecrisp-ternary
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
right, well since it decidedly did not remember how to edit files, i've just started a new session and told it to carry on. let's see how this one goes.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i wonder how much code that actually compiles i could have written while the vibe cod flailed around helplessly
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
at this point i may have to kill everything to get it to stop because i haven't figured out how to do more than give the appearance of pausing it.
but i'll let it go a little while longer and see if it magically remembers how to checks notes edit files.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
it has interpreted this as a build error. because obviously you get those when editing files.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
Validation failed for tool "edit":
- path: must have required properties path
- edits.0: must not have additional properties
it's forgotten how to edit files.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
at the same time as Brazil faces an EU ban on imports of their beef due to over-use of antibiotics, Herr Trump wanted to let more Brazilian beef into the US instead of helping American farmers deal with drought-forced herd liquidations and "middle man" consolidations.
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
rem@front-end.social wrote:
Hello friends. We're spinning up the machines and we're kicking off our newsletter starting tomorrow.
It'll include event news (like ticket releases 🎟️), something from our archive of 118 talks, and community news 🤗.
You can subscribe here https://ffconf.org/news/ or catch us on the RSS.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
Step 1: Review and correct the struct definitions in .h to be purely declarations.
oh yes, i'm sure that will fix everything.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
The persistent compilation failure indicates that the complexity of building a generic Lisp parser in C without a robust token stream management system is exceeding the scope of what can be reliably fixed through iterative text rewriting alone.
oh i don't know, us inferior humans have managed for many years.
The errors are deeply rooted in C's strict type system conflicting with the dynamic nature of the Lisp syntax.
no they're deeply rooted in you being shit
Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
jepyang@wandering.shop ("weed") wrote:
i am grateful to fediverse for turning me trans but it does suck that now i have opinions about software development
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
The user insists that the previous compilation failed
gee i wonder why the fuck that might be
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
self-OH:
german purity sausage
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
predictably, i came back to more gaslighting that it had built the binary when it hadn't even attempted to.
tell me again how this is the future?
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
tychotithonus@infosec.exchange ("Royce Williams") wrote:
Every org that has been relying on obscurity hiding their backdoor.
(Unfortunately, so is everyone else.)