Mastodon Feed: Posts

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
skinnylatte@hachyderm.io ("Adrianna Tan") wrote:

RE: https://vmst.io/@jalefkowit/116478297177233678

Friends don't let friends use GoDaddy.

You shouldn't let your enemies use GoDaddy either. It's that bad

Boosted by db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿"):
sturobson@front-end.social ("Stu Robson") wrote:

made some updates to ReliCSS by adding:

- a CSS custom property to design token tool I've been sitting on since last May
- my front-end archeology bookmarklets (as it made sense).

https://www.alwaystwisted.com/relicss/

🙏🖤

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

this is not to minimise any other problems with this tech of course, i am just absolutely fucking fed up with being told the moral equivalent of "look i found a loophole, if you just believe really hard it's ok"

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

if i hear one more person talk about how open weight models are democratising access to LLMs i am going to scream. this 'small' model used 60GB of RAM. i don't have 60GB of RAM and even if i had a job i could not fucking afford it right now.

keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri") wrote:

Glass design is a totally waste of time #WebDesign

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

blogged: Alternative thoughts
https://dbushell.com/2026/04/28/alternative-thoughts/

— hold on tight folks, the wheels are beginning to fall off, gonna be a bumpy ride

Boosted by db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿"):
vale@fedi.vale.rocks ("Vale") wrote:

AI discourse is a mess in general, but everyone using the same words to describe completely different things isn’t helping. Nobody seems to be able to agree on what anything actually means.

https://vale.rocks/posts/ai-terminology

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence

Boosted by jwz:
pikhq@treehouse.systems ("Ada Worcester 🏳️‍⚧️") wrote:

it is actually kinda funny. once upon a time the AGI worriers were concerned with "how will we keep an AGI in a box" and as it turns out that's not even slightly the concern. we're just gonna give it root because it promised to let some executive hire one less person

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

He's grifted billions since he's been in office. That motherfucker can pay for his own goddamned ballroom.

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
munin@infosec.exchange ("Fi 🏳️‍⚧️") wrote:

"At least you've got job security"

I am fucking -done- with hearing this.

No, I don't.

My 'job security' is an illusion based on the presumption that, in the event that my skillset is needed - or even essential - that there will be someone who will pay for the privilege of accessing those skills.

Except that the fucking LLM jockeys have decided to claim that their product has my skillset.

Even tho it demonstrably does not, this still means that the people who would presumably hire me are uninterested in doing so, due to the existence of a machine that promises to do it for them.

And when they fail, and their business goes insolvent, they still will not be hiring me because -they no longer have a fucking business to hire me for-.

So no. My carefully built, decades-of-practice skills are -not- job security, despite LLMs being obviously, flagrantly, and blatantly incapable of replacing me.

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

okay I'm calling it on unfollowing the "OpenSource" hashtag, it's like 90% slop cheerleading at this point and it's intensely depressing to see it. hopefully "Python" manages to avoid this fate

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
joelle@social.joelle.us ("Joelle") wrote:

The *entire* selling point to investors of LLMs is "we won't need to employ people."

That's it. That's all. That's why "AI" is worth trillions of dollars. No pesky humans to bother with.

It's not "the workers will be more creative" or "we'll help the disabled." There's no investment money for that. A company is what the worst investors are.

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

RE: https://universeodon.com/@progressivecat/116479832560444633

ah, this explains why ubuntu is belatedly going all-in on slop, it looks like they were about to have a win in the desktop space and we all know how that has to be avoided at all costs

pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:

Saw a bird.

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/04/27/saw-another-bird/

Boosted by jwz:
SecureOwl@infosec.exchange ("Mike Sheward") wrote:

I just got given admin access to some Medicaid filing platform because I own the domain internaluser.com

#infosec

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
phildini@wandering.shop wrote:

My #nbpy talk is now live, with many thanks to @andrew and the whole @NorthBayPython team for getting these out so quickly.

This was the hardest talk I've ever had to write, and I hope people enjoy it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HrELUrXfoA

Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
dansinker@omfg.town ("Dan Sinker") wrote:

One side obsession from my research into the 1920s is the extensive network of ELECTRIC trains that used to connect cities and towns across the central Midwest called the Interurban. We had this more than a hundred years ago. The things we had and the things we lost.

Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
indivisibleteam ("Indivisible ❌👑") wrote:

The nationwide day of economic disruption is almost here. Plus, we’re paying close attention to key votes on DHS funding, government surveillance, and Trump’s illegal war.

Attachments:

• video: 8f526cd33f0cb5af.mp4

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Hey @mwichary, what's the usual punishment for typography crimes of this magnitude?

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
chrisjrn@social.coop ("Christopher Neugebauer") wrote:

I encourage attendees of #NBPy to donate "if they got more value out of the conference than what they paid".

Today, our post-conference donations total more than a Silver Sponsorship. We have a truly wonderful community who care about us continuing to do what we do. I'm so grateful.

Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
Daojoan ("JA Westenberg") wrote:

Nothing makes you sound more like a Beltway ghoul than saying “this won’t play well in the Midwest” about basic human rights

Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
sundogplanets ("Prof. Sam Lawler") wrote:

Don't worry, Sam, SpaceX won't ACTUALLY launch 7,000 satellites! (There are currently 10,296 Starlink sats in orbit)

Don't worry, SpaceX said they'd get their satellites fainter than magnitude 7! (They have not https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link%5Fgateway/2025MNRAS.544L..15M/PUB%5FPDF)

Don't worry, they won't actually start Kessler Syndrome! https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/crashclock/

Don't worry, they won't actually launch a million AI data centres into orbit!! https://theconversation.com/a-new-space-race-could-turn-our-atmosphere-into-a-crematorium-for-satellites-276366

This is the fucking worst I-told-you-so https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
grimalkina ("Cat Hicks") wrote:

I have said and will continue to say most people have zero idea what it's like for scientists in the US right now.

We sat at an outdoor table the other day with a brilliant older queer scientist friend and ran into several scientist friends including one who worked at govt agencies on science funding. It is like having conversations after an apocalypse. So many people lost, labs folded, international postdocs gone, lines of work canned. DEI work going undercover, forbidden words erased

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
byorgey@mathstodon.xyz ("Brent Yorgey") wrote:

I wrote something for my students reflecting on the current cultural and technological moment - a collection of important things I want to say that I'm never quite sure how or when to say in class.

http://ozark.hendrix.edu/~yorgey/forest/00FD/index.xml

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
chaucerburnt@aus.social ("Chaucerburnt") wrote:

People need to stop asking LLMs "why did you do [thing]?" and treating the answer as authoritative. LLMs do not "remember" their thought processes in that way, and even if they did, the answers would likely not be human-understandable.

When you ask a LLM this question, you're asking it to construct the kind of explanation that a human might give in a similar conversation. Treating this as the *actual* answer is likely to lead you astray.

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/claude-powered-ai-coding-agent-deletes-entire-company-database-in-9-seconds-backups-zapped-after-cursor-tool-powered-by-anthropics-claude-goes-rogue

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

I once worked at a company where many people were wrong about obvious things all the time, and my job turned into going to meetings with those people. I got to feel smart and was often correct about obvious things, which was a degrading and ultimately self-destructive activity. If you are correct in every interaction, then you cannot learn or grow. I quit.

Not sure what to do when the people being wrong about obvious things are “leadership across nearly the entire industry”.

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mcc wrote:

TLDR

1. My definition of "P2P" or "Federated" is that if server A goes down, servers B and C can still talk to each other.

2. Bluesky/"Atmosphere" fails at this because Blacksky (B) utilizes Bluesky (A) to talk to me (C).

3. In order for Blacksky to avert this, they have to do something unreasonable and expensive.

4. Blacksky someday *will* do this, but will depend heavily on massively overworking Rudy and a few other people. This may someday fail.

5. ActivityPub has problems, but not these

Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
jpm@aus.social ("I love this, so I") wrote:

This is unexpectedly popular, so here is A VIDEO!

Attachments:

• video: A platypus doing platypus things in shallow clear water flowing over a rocky riverbed

jwz wrote:

It continues to amaze me that everyone in the Sunset is a single-issue voter, and that issue is wanting to turn a park into a freeway.

District 4 shaping up to be San Francisco's loudest and silliest race:
https://jwz.org/b/yk6w

adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁!") wrote:

You know that it is possible to create a #mailbox and an #xmpp account freely without phone number or existing email address?

https://message.casa/