Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
a@pdx.social ("Anthony Sorace") wrote:

Attachments:

 The Illusion of Persistence of Data in a Universe Ruled by Thermodynamics
 CD jewel cases, baseboard heaters
 Anthony Sorace (b. 1977)
 In the world of Information Technology, we hear about “permanent” storage for data and perfect digital copies. This piece reminds us that, in the end, we are always dealing with physical, analog artifacts subject to universal physical decay.][7] ([remote][8])
  • [An "art gallery" card describing the "sculpture", black text on a white background, from my partner's (more grounded) perspective. It reads:
 Thank God We Didn’t Catch Fire
 CD jewel cases, baseboard heaters
 Emma (remainder of name and birth date blurred)
 Jesus, we could’ve burned the whole house down. This could’ve been really bad. Wait, you want to keep this thing? You named it “The Illusion of Persistence…” …what? What the hell is wrong with your brain? Do you understand we could have burned the house down?][9] ([remote][10])
Mastodon Feed

xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:

i know what this actually is, but i wish it were an article about the existence of webcams https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3p7xj/scientists-are-getting-eerily-good-at-using-wifi-to-see-people-through-walls-in-detail

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
jakobrosin@mindly.social ("Jakob Rosin") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
tojiro ("Brandon Jones") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
tojiro ("Brandon Jones") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
fugueish@infosec.exchange ("Chris Palmer :donor:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
joepferguson@phpc.social ("Joe Ferguson") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:

@xor So that's what is happening! I've had that happen to me enough times to think there's some bizarro malware. 😆

Whenever it starts happening, I go into my browser settings and delete all reddit related things.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
randometc ("Tom Carden") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:

so like, I checked this weekend whether Lactaid pills expire and now I'm getting random push alerts to my phone of trending /r/ibs posts

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

At a functional level, this means that the burst of (forced) effort is not enough. We must not accept it in lieu of structural fixes.

Playing catch-up is an admission against interest, and should be read as consciousness of guilt. The disciplining function must be true browser and engine choice for iOS users. Not mandated use, but true competition. Apple have demonstrated that they can compete, and Safari will be _fine_ in that world. But never again should they be given a pass.

Mastodon Feed

xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:

the absolute worst feature of Reddit right now is that if you land on a page through search it flags you as interested and starts pushing you random alerts from that subreddit, with no apparent opt-out

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Six months ago I wrote some of this down, but the last couple of quarters have demonstrated even more directly how much of a choice this has been:

https://infrequently.org/2022/06/apple-is-not-defending-browser-engine-choice/

Apple starved the web through monopoly control over iOS and structural under-funding of Safari. Nobody made them, and none of these fast-follow features being implemented today are anything but an admission.

Cupertino is not a responsible steward and cannot be trusted w/ the future of the web ever again.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

All of which means that we should be *hopping mad* that these fast-catch-up features were APIs that Apple was more than happy to gaslight web developers about for years on end.

None of this needed to wait. There wasn't any legitimate reason for a contemplative pause. There wasn't some big bug in any of these APIs that would create huge risks. It was all thoughtfulness kayfabe. Misdirection to cover for disinvestment.

And it stinks to high heavens.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

On the back of Senators and regulators sniffing around, Apple has expanded the WebKit team by 30-100%. It's hard to know the # exactly because of attrition, opacity in volume of posted recs, and Apple's habit of seconding key engineers to secret projects, sapping WebKit of bandwidth. But it has been a _lot_.

And even without any of that extra firepower, Safari was doing just fine on macOS.

So the claim that enabling true competition on iOS would destroy Safari share is totally unsubstantiated.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

The strongest counterpoint to this is, of course, the situation on macOS.

But beyond that, the extraordinary catch-up of the Safari team over the past ~18 months (contemporaneous to regulatory scrutiny by coincidence, I'm sure) regarding features that every other engine has, shows that this was all a choice.

The purse strings got loosened, and Safari got better. Apple doesn't need protection, and none of these features were beyond the pale, turns out.

Mastodon Feed

pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:

Atheists & Christians alike should be united in condemning this linking of Nazi and Christian symbolism. And the people who are doing it.

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/17/they-get-away-with-it-because-they-can-get-away-with-it/

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

It's truly shocking how many people persist in the idea that Safari couldn't compete if it had to, despite all the evidence (macOS use) and the quality of the WebKit team when they're given the resources to execute.

Wild.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
caseynewton ("Casey Newton") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
patrickbrosset@mas.to ("Patrick Brosset") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
kacey@mspsocial.net ("Kacey 🌌") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
darktable wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
BennettTomlin@mstdn.social ("Bennett Tomlin") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
michelleful@scicomm.xyz ("Dr. Michelle Fullwood") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Gonna need to write the "In Defense of 'Best Viewed In'" blog post, aren't I?

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
ben@werd.social ("Ben Werdmuller :ben: :tardis:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
Greg@social.coop wrote:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

@chriscoyier This is an explicit, consistent, year-over-year choice.

We need to stop seeing it as the cause-free absence of some imaginary incentive and instead see it for what it is: an explicit strip-mining of the web for the benefit of Apple's shareholders.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

@chriscoyier In browser development, The Room Where It Happened is the budget meeting that sets headcount targets year-over-year. *Everything* else is downstream of that basic capacity allocation decision.

Apple is *choosing* to fuck over the web by ensuring that there's no capacity for any other outcome to emerge, either through the Safari/WebKit teams or through competition.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

@chriscoyier So Apple is *choosing* to deprive WebKit/Safari of capacity. It is *choosing* to continually deny API access to browsers. It's *choosing*, every single year, to hurt Mozilla and every other browser vendor while reinvesting a tiiiiiiiiny fraction of the cream it skims from search engine deals back into engine develpoment.

These are choices.