Struggeling with executive disfunciton, so I'll just be watching some videos and learning things in the process.
Waiting for the @penpot "Unboxing Penpot" livestream to start ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0tLukJmj_k ), so I'm watching @doctormo talk from the Creative Freedom Summit 2023 and finally learning how the page tool works in Inkscape! :blobaww:
https://tube.tchncs.de/w/rWWP5EJ1MvT31Tgu6uyxDK
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Speaking of tired tropes, is anyone else fed up with trolley problems?
Attachments:
Reblogged by pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑"):
TheOtterDragon@eldritch.cafe ("Loutre Dragon") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I guess I'm going to be compelled to watch a zombie show. Maybe it'll descend into the usual shoot-em-in-the-head garbage and I'll be able to escape?
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/31/bored-with-zombie-movies-but/
Attachments:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
brianleroux@indieweb.social ("Brian LeRoux 💚") wrote:
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
morning sunshine on Oscar the housepanther
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
“The Manhattan district attorney’s office on Monday began presenting evidence to a grand jury about Donald J. Trump’s role in paying hush money [from campaign donations] to a porn star during his 2016 presidential campaign, laying the groundwork for potential criminal charges against the former president in the coming months”
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
one of the bodycam videos released appears to show the officers talking through what story they were going to report. the report that was filed was full of details about the encounter which were contradicted by the video evidence.
this affair is emblematic of what must change in US police culture, nation-wide.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
I just remembered that #BandCampFriday is happening again on Feb. 3rd. I'm gonna have to pull some picks form my queue.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
heurism@mstdn.social ("Heurism") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Stop electing Republicans, they're know-nothings who want to wreck science education.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/31/montana-is-right-next-to-north-dakota/
Attachments:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
eosfpodcast@universeodon.com ("Rod Faulkner") wrote:
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
nighten@gamedevalliance.fr ("NIGHTEͶ ∆") wrote:
Reblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
WPalant@infosec.exchange ("Yellow Flag") wrote:
nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
Regular reminder that "less lines of code" DOES NOT necessarily equal "less logical complexity".
Aim for the latter, not the former! Nobody with any real engineering experience cares if your code is verbose. People care if your code is structured, safe, predictable, auditable.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Infinitely angry about Vercel douches admitting what the honest folks warned teams about them 3+ years ago.
Next.js is damage; route around accordingly
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
would like to say I'm nonplussed by frontend complexity merchants admitting-by-any-other-name that their efforts have been fully focused on removing critique of React dogma.
Religion is toxic in bad forms, y'all.
Do right by users while you can.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Remember: the JS-first crowd admitting that they had no fucking idea how the browser works is, at time and all places, a redeemable token.
They do not undersatand.
They are proud of it.
If you don't nope out, they'll f your product too.
To this day this remains the best music video to Daft Punk's Harder Better Faster Stronger.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Look, it's fun to taunt the JS uber ales kidz for their ridiculous misunderstandings of how browsers, networks, and CPUs actually work, but I think it's important for us to remember how dumb they were about garbage collection and hidden class transition overhead.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
If you'd like to understand React '23, look no further than Web '16. Per usual, they're only most of a decade late!:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Dear JavaScript:
Know that I say this with love: if it ain't your CPU, you are not welcome. Please back away slowly and respect the natural rituals of replacement and memory allocation.
-- yours, eveyone in your family that didn't "make it" in a sad Sunnyvale efficiency
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
andy@bell.bz ("Andy Bell") wrote:
Attachments:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The JS community thought I was against them when I gave this talk 7+ years ago, identifying the budding crisis they had zero interest in solving:
If you buy another lemon from these complexity merchents, in 2023, it's univocal proof that you're a *terrible* manager:
https://infrequently.org/2022/05/performance-management-maturity/
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
ashleygjovik@mstdn.social ("Ashley M. Gjøvik, J.D.") wrote:
Attachments:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
OH: "we have de-optimised for developer experience"
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
A number of folks have reached out to us over the past few months asking how they could help Mastodon out. Unfortunately, we haven't had the capacity to accept those kind offers at the time.
If you're interested in getting involved as a volunteer, please fill out this form (and share it around!) so we know who could help with what. (There is plenty that needs doing!)
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Folks, don't reward B.S. artists that are unrepentant about selling you a lemon used Hummer when you finally decide to get an EV.
Even if they have 'em on the lot, I promise, they're still f'ing you *somehow*.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
You know what *didn't* cause the React community to admit HTML-first folk have been right all along?
Project Aurora.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
zachleat@zachleat.com ("Zach Leatherman :11ty:") wrote: