Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
chancerydaily@masto.ai ("Chance The Lawyer ⚡︎") wrote:
Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
evateemad@est.social ("Eva") wrote:
Attachments:
The revolution will be behind a paywall.
Attachments:
The most common piece of furniture in the world, the Monobloc chair.
A masterpiece and a disease.
Attachments:
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
textfiles@mastodon.archive.org ("Jason Scott") wrote:
Attachments:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Dream accomplished: we're churning out a scary number of spiders now.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/02/16/we-have-become-a-spider-breeding-machine/
youtube.com/watch?v=x3DRoxe7Pik
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
nickevershed@aus.social wrote:
Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
NSA@national-defence.network ("National Security Agency :verified: ") wrote:
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
dosnostalgic ("Anatoly Shashkin💾") wrote:
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
JFC:
"In one week alone in the Vuhledar clash, the Ukrainian General Staff estimates, Russia lost at least 130 armored vehicles, including 36 tanks. That estimate has been supported by drone footage reviewed by independent military analysts and by accounts from Russian military bloggers, who are ardent supporters of the war but sharp critics of its conduct by top Russian commanders."
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
from the ‘Untrained Warm Bodies with Rifles & Uniforms Doth Not an Army Make” Department:
"Moscow’s Military Capabilities Are in Question After Failed Battle for Ukrainian City
A disastrous Russian assault on Vuhledar, viewed as an opening move in an expected spring offensive, has renewed doubts about Moscow’s ability to sustain a large-scale ground assault."
bcrypt@infosec.exchange ("yan") wrote:
what a week to be an amateur scientific balloon hobbyist! https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/aircraft-propulsion/hobby-clubs-missing-balloon-feared-shot-down-usaf
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
‘“No reasonable person would have thought that,” said the network’s politics editor at the time, Chris Stirewalt, referring to the allegation that Dominion rigged the election. Bill Sammon, Fox’s managing editor in Washington, is quoted as saying, “It’s remarkable how weak ratings make good journalists do bad things.”
Fox pushed out both journalists after the 2020 election.’
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
‘“This filing argues a fire hose of direct evidence of knowing falsity,” said RonNell Andersen Jones, a professor of law at the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. “It gives a powerful preview of one of the best-supported claims of actual malice we have seen in any major-media case.”’
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
“as Fox’s ratings fell sharply after the election and the president refused to concede, many of the network’s most popular hosts and shows began promoting outlandish claims of a far-reaching voter fraud conspiracy involving Dominion machines to deny Mr. Trump a second term.”
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
damn, these folks are *really* cynical… and they think we are all dumb as posts:
“Fox Stars Privately Expressed Disbelief About Election Fraud Claims. ‘Crazy Stuff.’
The comments, by Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and others, were released as part of a defamation suit against Fox News by Dominion Voter Systems.”
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
tomayac@toot.cafe ("Thomas Steiner :chrome:") wrote:
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
smellsofbikes ("smellsofbikes velocipede") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
alastair@mastodon.online ("Alastair Coote") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
bp@bennypowers.dev ("Benny Powers 🇨🇦️🇮🇱️") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The "it's fine, we know we're losing users with these technology choices" crowd *really* needs to start showing their work.
What is the expected revenue gain in wealthy user segments per KB of JS?
What is expected revenue loss per KB of JS in other segments?
What does the distribution look like?
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
elmiller0330@disabled.social ("Lizzy Miller") wrote:
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
“Virginia governor blocks bill banning police from seeking menstrual histories
Glenn Youngkin essentially kills bill passed in Democratic-led state senate to ban search warrants for menstrual data on tracking apps”
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dangillmor ("Dan Gillmor") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
BBCWorld@mediastodon.com ("BBC News (World)") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dangillmor ("Dan Gillmor") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
Weld@infosec.exchange ("Chris Wysopal") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So don't take the next JS bro sales pitch at face value; the odds that it's wrapping a deep wisdom and understanding -- rather than an embarrassing amount of libertarian I've-got-mine-jack-ism -- is vanishingly small.
Hire people to fix problems with CSS and HTML, not to make them with JS.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So let's stop beating around the bush: the JS community sold lemons at a furious rate, are embarassed about the terrible consequences of their predictable (and predicted) actions -- as well they should be -- and want you to continue to pretend they knew what they were doing all along.
Friends, Occam's Razor suggests they did not.