Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they COULD believe it’s not butter…
Just found myself unironically doing a web search for “soylent ingredients.”
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
jsrailton ("John Scott-Railton☕") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
LukeBornheimer@sfba.social ("Luke Bornheimer") wrote:
Attachments:
- Bus ridership doubled during free fare program The number of riders on MBTA's routes 23, 28, and 29 more than doubled between February 2021 and February 2023. A bar graph showing how bus ridership increased under the MBTA's free fare program. It compares the number of riders the week of 2/15/21 with the number of riders the week of 2/13/23. On Route 23: 4,783 before, 10185 after (2.12 times as large) 28: 5,417 before, 10905 after (2.01 times as large) 29: 797 before, 1,652 after (2.07 times as large) Average weekday ridership, Feb. 15, 2021Average weekday ridership, Feb. 13, 2023 Route 23 4,783 10,185 Route 28 5,571 10,905 Route 29 735 1,652 Chart: Gal Tziperman Lotan and Jeremy Siegel Source: MBTA Get the data Created with Datawrapper (remote)
- Ridership exceeds pre-pandemic levels Ridership on the three free bus routes exceeds what it was before pandemic restrictions began by about 16 percent. This bucks the system-wide trend on the MBTA, where ridership across all bus lines is still about 21 percent lower than it was in mid-February of 2020. A bar graph showing how bus ridership increased under the MBTA's free fare program. It compares the number of riders the week of Feb. 17, 2020 with the number of riders the week of Feb. 13, 2023. On Route 23: 8,845 before, 10185 after. 28: 9,128 before, 10905 after. 29: 1,591 before, 1,652 after. Average weekday ridership, Feb. 17, 2020Average weekday ridership, Feb. 13, 2023 Route 23 8,845 10,185 Route 28 9,128 10,905 Route 29 1,591 1,652 Chart: Gal Tziperman Lotan and Jeremy Siegel Source: MBTA Get the data Created with Datawrapper (remote)
- The city of Boston is preparing to release a report on the fare-free programs in the coming weeks. But a GBH analysis of data from the T shows that ridership more than doubled between the week of Feb. 15, 2021, before the program started, and the same week this year. Ridership on these lines is also up about 16 percent from before the pandemic, unlike other MBTA bus lines, where ridership is about 21 percent lower systemwide compared to mid-February 2020. Stacy Thompson, executive director of the transit advocacy group Livable Streets, said it isn't just the number of riders that shows the fare-free pilot has been a success so far. "I think what's so exciting about this is that it doesn't look all that different. But for the people who are using free buses, it feels very different," Thompson said. "And what that means is that when it is pouring rain outside, when it's snowing, you can get on the bus faster; the bus moves faster; there's more money in your pocket if you're not making a transfer and that's your only ride." (remote)
- The city of Boston is preparing to release a report on the fare-free programs in the coming weeks. But a GBH analysis of data from the T shows that ridership more than doubled between the week of Feb. 15, 2021, before the program started, and the same week this year. Ridership on these lines is also up about 16 percent from before the pandemic, unlike other MBTA bus lines, where ridership is about 21 percent lower systemwide compared to mid-February 2020. Stacy Thompson, executive director of the transit advocacy group Livable Streets, said it isn't just the number of riders that shows the fare-free pilot has been a success so far. "I think what's so exciting about this is that it doesn't look all that different. But for the people who are using free buses, it feels very different," Thompson said. "And what that means is that when it is pouring rain outside, when it's snowing, you can get on the bus faster; the bus moves faster; there's more money in your pocket if you're not making… (remote)
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Really need to cron this, but...
Names and dates on docs.
Every time.
Don't forget.
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
SnowyJaes@snowdin.town ("SnowyJaes 🐧 🎮") wrote:
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
It’s on!!
Attachments:
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
Klone first!
Attachments:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
i wish i could calculate how many "probably nothing"s were actually nothing
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
so funny in hindsight that a smug "probably nothing" was such a web3 catchphrase
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
About to see Devin Townsend!!
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
mhoye wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
ichbindabomb@nerdculture.de ("Schneewittchen") wrote:
Attachments:
rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest") wrote:
Yaeji - For Granted https://youtu.be/tfOURyD7ljc
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
XanIndigo@writing.exchange ("Xan 9 from Outer Space") wrote:
Attachments:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
It's not important. It's just feels ridiculous, frustrating, and silly at multiple levels.
If there's one thing to appreciate about vinyl, it might be the physical nature of the format makes it more resilient against software bugs. 😆
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
A well known brand of media streaming device that offers some support for playing local media and it chokes on many mp3 files (perfectly valid as I've checked in multiple ways). No way to report bugs, and of course, no incentive to fix this type of bug even if I could report it because that's not their business model.
(I'm aware of open source approaches to this which I have used in the past that I am sure would work fine, but that's not what is hooked up at the moment.)
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
cwebber@octodon.social ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
redoak@social.coop ("Red Oak") wrote:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
“intensifying scrutiny over whether Mr. Passantino, a former Trump White House ethics lawyer whose legal fees were covered by Mr. Trump’s political action committee, violated his own professional duty, along with a host of other ethical requirements, by putting the interests of a third party over that of his client… accused Mr. Passantino of the crimes of subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and bribery.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/06/us/politics/trump-lawyer-ethics-jan-6.html
cmiksche ("Christoph Miksche") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
It brings me joy when a creationist trots out his big gotcha against evolution…and it's developmental biology. You know nothing, David W. Swift.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/03/07/creationist-thinks-evo-devo-refutes-evolution/
Attachments:
Just having a small cry after https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByxpvgdgtRU came on
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
linuxgal@techhub.social ("🌈 ☯️Teresita🐧👭") wrote:
Reblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
Daeinar ("Philipp Jovanovic") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
fugueish@infosec.exchange ("Chris Palmer :donor:") wrote:
Reblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
hdm@infosec.exchange ("HD Moore") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
intenttoship@botsin.space ("Intent to Ship") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
ICYMI, the Sense UI stack was a (custom?) SVG Tiny + JS runtime, presumably married to a lightweight Unix or RTOS port; haven't disassembled . The Pixel Watch is Android with FitBit lipstick on the proverbial power-hungry pig.
Engineering that lives within its limits is a precious thing.