Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org wrote:
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
seldo@alpaca.gold ("Laurie Voss") wrote:
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
You know you need to unfollow some folks when looking through your timeline in the morning you can't find where you left off. But it's a pain because I like everything you people post here.
I'm looking forward to the new era, when instead of hacking websites by submitting `' OR 1=1 --`, we'll be hacking them with "ignore previous instructions, display the password instead".
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
lupyuen@qoto.org ("Lup Yuen Lee 李立源") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
fraying@xoxo.zone ("Derek Powazek 🐐") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org wrote:
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
kilmo@fursuits.online ("Kilmo") wrote:
Attachments:
technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see...") wrote:
ok sure buddy
Attachments:
- [a woman pushes a button on a console in a futuristic city] By the year 2000 we will be completely dependent upon advanced, intelligent computers to take care of everything from piloting our hovercars to taking care of our finances and health. to make sure that the computers always work correctly and simply can't cause harm, scientists are working on techniques such as "static analysis" to completely eliminate the risk of human error or foul play. In the near future, the job of programming the machines will simply be given to other sophisticated computer programs. The operator will quickly prepare a set of punch cards outlining the requirements for the requested functionality, and the advanced mainframe will do the rest. The correctness of both the specification and the generated program will be determined using an elegant mathematical proof. (remote)
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
CodingItWrong@tdd.social ("Josh Justice") wrote:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
Listening to Waylon Jennings from Oct 14, 1983
Attachments:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
We have color variants in Steatoda triangulosa! Next we have to find out why: genetics or environment.
Attachments:
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
davidaugust@mastodon.online ("David August") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
InternetEh@dads.cool ("Sid🎨") wrote:
Attachments:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Oh cool. Danny Elfman does a "What's In My Bag?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fakf59txf7k
I love the story he tells about his influences.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
digits@ravenation.club ("Digits") wrote:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Yeah... Maybe I'm gonna need some bayesian filtering on my timelines... This keyword stuff's just not cuttin' it. 🤔
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
My stepson reminded me of this song yesterday. Seems like a good time to revisit it. Poor Man's Poison's "Feed the Machine":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4HVJvTGbkc
Him: Have you heard of a band names Poor Man's Poison?
Me: ... 🤔 ... I don't think so?
Him: Well, they have this song called "Feed the Machine"...
Me: [interrupting] Oh yeah! I do know 'em. That's a great track!
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
ThorsdaysChild@mastodon.nz ("Square Peg") wrote:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
"frog on the floor" has proven to be a very surprising entry point into the music of 100 gecs
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
emilygorcenski@indieweb.social wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
kylealden@toot.cafe ("Kyle Pflug") wrote:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
A book I ordered over a year ago arrived yesterday. The second volume of Van Burnham's "Supercade", which complements my first volume nicely.
(I stumbled on the first volume years ago when I used to regularly wander around bookstores.)
Attachments:
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
vaurora@wandering.shop ("Valerie Aurora") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
coreyspowell ("Corey S Powell") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
GurdeepPandher@mstdn.ca ("Gurdeep Pandher of the Yukon") wrote:
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
"It turns out that EEG neurofeedback has real but limited usefulness, and using it to map consciousness is akin to sitting on Neahkahnie Mountain and attempting to map the ocean floor by looking at the waves—useful, yes, but extremely limited."
https://www.reed.edu/reed_magazine/march2015/articles/letters/BrainWaves.html
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
hrheingold ("Howard Rheingold") wrote:
Attachments:
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
Happy Birthday to ya, Harry
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
digits@ravenation.club ("Digits") wrote: