pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
How low can creationists sink? How about pretending the great evo-devo scientist Rudy Raff provided evidence against evolution?
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
How low can creationists sink? How about pretending the great evo-devo scientist Rudy Raff provided evidence against evolution?
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
intficpics@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Interactive Fiction Pictures") wrote:
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
scottsantens@hachyderm.io ("Scott Santens") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
wonderofscience ("Wonder of Science") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
This post captures much of what I advise teams about: do work proportional to what's onscreen.
https://www.projectwallace.com/blog/making-analyze-css-render-6x-faster
via @tunetheweb
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
chris_hayes@fosstodon.org ("Chris Hayes") wrote:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Remember: Apple's argument to the UK competition tribunal wasn't that users would be safer if they didn't have a choice to switch browsers when the next WebKit vuln lands.
It wasn't that WebKit is actually a leading engine.
It wasn't that businesses aren't harmed by a decade of shocking neglect and showstopping bugs.
No, Apple's argument was "you didn't begin an investigation fast enough".
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
It's telling that Cupertino is willing to go to these extremes despite the stacking reputational risks. The extractive machine must be fed!
A web that *actually* competes with apps the way Apple has claims in court that they do just can't be allowed to emerge.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
All this to keep you from being able to run *real* Firefox. Or Chrome. Or Brave. Or Opera.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Odious background:
https://mastodon.social/@owa/110120581945462519
...which is a reminder that the recent burst of investment in Safari is *also* a delay tactic; backup for an argument that "there's nothing to see here, it's all fine":
https://infrequently.org/2023/02/safari-16-4-is-an-admission/
Expect Safari headcount to mysteriously go walkabout should the EU astroturfing and lobbying go the same way as the UK petulance has.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
With the CMA Appeal, the mask is fully off: Apple really hates the idea of you being able to choose a better browser. So much so that it's willing to funnel dark money to lobbying groups and litigate even the smallest technicalities to avoid having to compete.
Imagine, if you can, this kind of cash going to improve WebKit!
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
time to get a little wired and clean the kitchen floor
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
Noupside@saturation.social ("Renee DiResta") wrote:
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
jschauma@mstdn.social ("Jan Schaumann") wrote:
Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
robin ("Robin Berjon") wrote:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Dang... I just keep listening to this over and over...
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
So far my April 1st hasn't been too bad, but it's probably best to take a break from the internet today. Before I go, have this lovely little duet with Aurora and Pomme:
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
RadicalEdward@hackers.town ("Radical Edward :hackers_town:") wrote:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
"In fact, we should acknowledge that most people are forced to live inside someone else’s imagination and one of the things we have to come to grips with is how the nightmares that many people are forced to endure are the underside of elite fantasies about efficiency, profit, and social control. Racism, among other axes of domination, helps produce this fragmented imagination, misery for some, monopoly for others."
-- Dr. Ruha Benjamin
Via
https://just-tech.ssrc.org/articles/challenging-techs-imagined-future/
2/2
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
"Imagination is a contested field of action, not an ephemeral afterthought that we have the luxury to dismiss or romanticize, but a resource, a battleground, an input and output of technology and social order."
1/n
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
an early version of “Green to Gold”
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
bob@epicyon.libreserver.org ("Bob Mottram :debian:") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
The real enemy hiding behind AI, the villain that will destroy us all, is capitalism.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/04/01/how-ai-will-destroy-us/
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Imagining an April Fool's prank so egregious we end up modifying the calendar to adopt a 29th day of February, with the 30th occurring on leap years, and start April on the 2nd. :thonking:
My arm was asleep while I was asleep. I think my brain just invented a nightmare to wake me up. Wild.
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
zarfeblong@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Andrew Plotkin") wrote:
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
moshboy wrote:
rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest") wrote:
Slay the Spire is a roguelike deckbuilder in which the goal is to slay absolute penis
To my trans friends & to those I haven't yet met, thank you for existing & allowing yourself to be seen. The world is better with you in it. 🏳️⚧️ #TransDayOfVisbility