Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

teller ("Siim Teller") wrote:

This feels like a fairly specific advice from CNN.

#hippocalypse

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
alex@cybervillains.com ("Alex Stamos") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Yes, I'm upset about this.

It's very much is a subtoot of the Deloitte / Accenture / IBM / CGI / SMX / Palantir axis of derp.

Functionally we deserve much more per buck, even if, morally, we're getting what we're owed.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
MelMScow@mas.to ("MMS") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

The most important thing about web performance is being in the shoes of users who MUST but CANNOT access your Silicon-Valley-approved, RFP-certified nonsense

When the trainers and the consultants and the conference organisers are done with you, ya know what's left?

Your system.

That you own.

And must now manage.

Anyway, if your JS hangover includes a public sector service, please reach out in DMs. I'll charge zero money and tell nobody.

Mastodon Feed

lloydmeta ("Lloyd") wrote:

I fucking love my team at work.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
mmasnick ("Mike Masnick ✅") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
surcomplicated@mastodon.sdf.org ("Zoomer Antimillenarian") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
pmschu@mas.to ("PatS") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by blithe ("Blithe"):
ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org ("AI6YR") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
drwho@hackers.town ("The Doctor") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
trashheap@tech.lgbt ("trashHeap :verified_gay:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
paul_irish@toot.cafe ("Paul Irish") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Lyrilith@nitecrew.rip wrote:

Just scanned my lecture doodle from yesterday and tried to edit out the light blue pen, which I used for sketching.

Just one of those drawings when you start with no solid idea in your mind and just see where things go.

#MastoArt #sketch #sketchbook #markers #pen

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
nepetalakton@mathstodon.xyz ("Nepetalakton") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

anathema@girlcock.club wrote:

...OK I actually had Chat-GPT answer a question I couldn't find on google/duck because between SEO spam and search engines ignoring half your query terms nothing I got was of any use.

`What does `box !!T` do in CIL?` -- specifically what is the significance of the '!!' is what I wanted to know.

I verified the answer was correct (it was) so hooray for Chat-GPT probably knowing the dotnet ECMA standards.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
NPR@press.coop ("NPR :press:") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
ZachWeinersmith ("Zach Weinersmith") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:

Revisiting this classic (to me) TWRP song. "Synthesize Her":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ2LUrXxa1o

Maybe the lyrics don't quite match the video, but in my head, the video is the canonical meaning of the song. 😆

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
grammargirl@zirk.us ("Mignon Fogarty") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
liw@toot.liw.fi ("Lars Wirzenius") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
kellylepo@astrodon.social ("Kelly Lepo") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
jamesholden@universeodon.com wrote:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

One weird trick for improving your web performance!

Develop an understanding of your system such that you can answer *"what is this for?"* regarding any significant fraction of critical path latency.

Good performance is downstream of mastery, which is why complexity is the enemy of going fast: every increment of complexity requires that the team (minimally: all PMs and senior engineers) develop a deep understanding of the new complexity.

You cannot abstract understanding.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins"):
brewsterkahle@mastodon.archive.org ("Brewster Kahle") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

fribbledom ("muesli") wrote:

While tolerance is a big part of society, I'd love to share common goals, values, and respect for another.

It seems that tolerance is all we have left.

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
KarlBode@masto.ai wrote:

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Your quarterly reminder that all of your computing should move to the web if and when it can, and that folks who are opposed to the necessary expansions of the web's power to make that happen aren't actually pro-security (despite the tireless, tiresome posturing):

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cybercriminals-charge-5k-to-add-android-malware-to-google-play/

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
tomayac@toot.cafe ("Thomas Steiner :chrome:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
MediaLawProf ("Chip Stewart") wrote: