Mastodon Feed
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
MKBHD is a real one. #HumaneAiPin
Mastodon FeedMastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
In which some guy wonders out loud why Gaza doesn't have a robust export market and why Gazans aren't launching any tech startups while under 17 years of full land, air and sea blockade
Attachments:
Mastodon FeedReblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
emilygorcenski@indieweb.social wrote:
Spend $5000/user/year on a CRM/ERP license, export the data to excel because that’s the only way you can actually work with it
Mastodon FeedReblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
AAKL@noc.social ("Aida Akl") wrote:
It's important to note, however, that this is a #Mozilla study.
Study: #Apple, Google, Meta, others struggle when it comes to ad transparency #google #Meta https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/04/16/apple-google-meta-others-struggle-when-it-comes-to-ad-transparency @appleinsider
Mozilla's study: https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/investigation-every-tech-giants-ad-oversight-tools-fall-short-in-historic-election-year/
Mastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
I wonder if LLMs will be so good one day that they'll be able to disassemble any ASM into readable code in any language we might care to want it in
Mastodon Feedpzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I think I'd prefer this vehicle over the Cybertruck, to be honest.
Attachments:
Mastodon FeedReblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
Call me old fashioned but this is still the best wearable ever made.
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
Oh, what a tangled social web we weave when first we practice to deceive
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
BlueSky has a dead butterfly logo and I cannot unsee it.
https://www.emilydamstra.com/please-enough-dead-butterflies/
Mastodon FeedReblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
infosecrodney@infosec.exchange ("Infosec Rodney Dangerfield") wrote:
I used quantum cryptography to secure my messages. The good news is they're secure. The bad news? I need a quantum computer to read them.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
infosecrodney@infosec.exchange ("Infosec Rodney Dangerfield") wrote:
I decided to beef up my email security. Now, all my spam comes encrypted.
Mastodon Feedpzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
The Cass Report seems to be a kind of palimpsest that allows everyone to read their preferred interpretation into it.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/04/16/the-only-summary-of-the-cass-report-that-i-need/
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedpzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I was asked to give my opinions of Frayn's play, Copenhagen.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/04/16/copenhagen/
Mastodon FeedReblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
MostlyHarmless@thecanadian.social wrote:
I just blew all my party money on bills again.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
detachedspork@mastodon.ie ("detached spork") wrote:
This is of course the main problem with being "politically correct" - the people who believe it's shameful to be fat will require you say "Body diversity" and the people who believe "fat" is merely a descriptive term for people who have more body fat than the default people, will just say fat.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
detachedspork@mastodon.ie ("detached spork") wrote:
Just had two comments removed from a subreddit for using the word "fat" (about my own body, in one instance, and about a tv show character who is, like me, fat).
And frankly I'd rather be called fat by someone who didn't think fat is something shameful than called "plus sized" by someone who felt they had to euphemise what my body looks like.
Mastodon Feedjsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
scouts out!
Attachments:
Mastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
In Shamir secret sharing, is it alright for the leading coefficient of the polynomial to always be non-zero?
If you answer "No", please justify your answer or be prepared to face me in mortal combat.
Mastodon FeedWD40 has no right to smell so delicious.
Mastodon FeedGargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
He’s ready to go on another adventure.
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Fascinating: https://pca.st/h0q2rggu
Mastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
Beautiful run this morning!
Attachments:
Mastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
Response posted by Chen: http://www.chenyilei.net/
Mastodon Feednadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi") wrote:
"In this short note we point to an error in the claims of Chen’s paper." https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/583
Mastodon FeedReblogged by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
mttaggart@infosec.town ("Taggart :donor:") wrote:
The recent attempted XZ Utils backdoor (CVE-2024-3094) may not be an isolated incident as evidenced by a similar credible takeover attempt intercepted by the OpenJS Foundation, home to JavaScript projects used by billions of websites worldwide. The Open Source Security (OpenSSF) and OpenJS Foundations are calling all open source maintainers to be alert for social engineering takeover attempts, to recognize the early threat patterns emerging, and to take steps to protect their open source projects.
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Jan 2024) https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal/artificial-episode-3-chatgpt/835fdc63-75ff-4ef1-b18c-f40537807cfe# :
> The honest answer is we have no idea. We have never made any revenue. We have no current plans to make revenue. We have no idea how we may one day generate revenue. We have made a soft promise to investors that once we've built this sort of generally intelligent system, basically we will ask it to figure out a way to generate an investment return for you.
Deeply unserious people.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
scottarc@infosec.exchange ("Scott Arciszewski") wrote:
So funny story about this PuTTY vulnerability https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/vuln-p521-bias.html
Literally every time I've ever reviewed an ECDSA over P-521 implementation, this was the absolute first thing I thought to look for. I've never actually found an implementation in the wild that was susceptible to this sort of weakness, but it seemed like a foot-gun that someone would implement eventually.
Turns out, it was PuTTy. Incredible.
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
https://fromjason.xyz/p/notebook/any-technology-indistinguishable-from-magic-is-hiding-something/
Mastodon FeedReblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
Any technology indistinguishable from magic is hiding something.
Mastodon Feedjsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
reading “The Atrocity Files” by @cstross left me wandering around on the “First-order logic” page… of course it did