fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
We need more blog punks writing about big tech without worrying what big tech may think. #google
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
We need more blog punks writing about big tech without worrying what big tech may think. #google
The https://js-naked-day.org is easy for me: https://lib.rs has no JavaScript. It never had any.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
The spiders need sex.
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
hn250@social.lansky.name ("Hacker News 250") wrote:
The man who killed Google Search
Link: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40133976
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
mwl@io.mwl.io ("Michael W Lucas¹ :flan_mail:") wrote:
holy crap, it seems I'm stoned enough to understand Kickstarter instructions that I had been staring at for five days!
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mwlucas/run-your-own-mail-server
If you have any interest, please follow. KS algorithms kick in once I have ten followers.
There's also https://mwl.io/ks
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
(If anyone recognizes this UI: it's just an experiment, very much subject to change.)
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
This is why I hate Safari/iOS.
It's the exact same page, with the exact same code, on both sides. But on the left (Safari on MacOS), the arrow shows *above* the item as it should, and on the right (Safari on iOS), the arrow is inexplicably *behind* the circle.
Note there's no z-index involved anywhere here. This is all just default browser stacking order.
One browser shouldn't have two separate implementations of stacking order.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Next step: arrest all university faculty. They're all commies anyway.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/04/24/arrest-those-tolerant-peaceniks-forsomething/
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
Today in History, 1877:
sealing "The Corrupt Bargain of 1876" which settled a contested election, Pres. R. B. Hayes withdraws Federal Troops from defending the last Southern State House (in LA), thereby effectively destroying Reconstruction.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
If creationists want to talk to me, they have to start saying sensible things.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/04/24/theyre-trying-to-wear-me-down/
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
ajsadauskas@aus.social ("AJ Sadauskas") wrote:
There was no drone delivery future. There was never going to be a drone delivery future.
Just like there was never going to be self-driving Uber taxis. Or Amazon Go supermarkets on every corner. Or hyperloops. Or earth-to-earth space travel on SpaceX rockets. Or level-five full self driving Teslas.
Just like there will not be a general artificial intelligence ChatGPT in the next couple of years.
They were all scams designed to lure dollars from investors and generate good PR.
It was all bullshit. It was always bullshit.
Nothing more.
rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest") wrote:
fuck to newspapers dot com
Reblogged by nadim@symbolic.software ("Nadim Kobeissi"):
bpreneel@infosec.exchange ("Bart Preneel") wrote:
10 years after the FBI "going dark" statement, Europol issued a similar
statement
https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/EDOC-%231384205-v1-Joint_Declaration_of_the_European_Police_Chiefs.PDFMasks are falling off: perhaps we will not get the client side scanning we wanted (#chatcontrol) (the camera in every room) hence we will ask for ban on end-to-end encryption (make curtains and blinds illegal).
n addition to academia, civil society, and industry, former NSA chiefs keep stating that strong end-to-end encryption protection is essential for a secure digital society.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
Americans don't make a 180 on Palestinian support en mass without Black and brown activists putting in the work and organizing on TikTok.
We don't have the same powerful conversations about Black liberation without Black activists educating us for free on TikTok.
To attack them now because they're not on your little decentralized platform the way you think they should be is fucking wild.
Have we considered maybe this place isn't as inviting to POC as we think it is?
I'm out for a while.
Reblogged by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
matuzo@front-end.social ("Manuel Matuzović") wrote:
Tomorrow we celebrate JS Naked Day!
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
theluddite@assemblag.es ("The Luddite") wrote:
Reddit signed a deal with Google to use its data to train LLMs. To celebrate, we made a firefox extension that lets you replace all your comments with any text of your choosing. All we ask is that you not choose something copyrighted. The New York Times is currently suing OpenAI for training ChatGPT on its copyrighted material, and we wouldn't want Reddit's uniquely valuable data to become hopelessly intermingled with that of litigious copyright-holders.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
The launch of #Threads was truly Zuck's dirt bag magnum opus.
He duct taped it to his most popular platform. Then, he showed us pictures of our IG friends and said they were all waiting for us to join. And when we got there and saw it was just Starbucks and a bunch of transphobes posting, he told us we couldn't delete his shittier Twitter without also deleting the app we actually cared about.
Not to mention putting us through countless videos of Mosseri's necklace.
10/10 no notes.
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
jeffowski@mastodon.world ("Church of Jeff") wrote:
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
A Chrome extension that just replaces all AI icons with a hand that has two thumbs
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤") wrote:
https://www.platformer.news/tiktok-ban-bill-senate-legal-challenge-first-amendment/
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Whatever Tom Cotton recommends, do the opposite.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/04/23/better-send-in-the-riot-squad/
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
maddy@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Madeline Stephanie Thorson") wrote:
the two types of celeste steam reviews
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
I was so excited about the good news I forgot the uspol CW. Sorry 'bout that, everybody.
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
To each and every company that ever made me sign a non-compete agreement, I offer a sincere and enthusiastic HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA fuck off.
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
docpop ("Doctor Popular") wrote:
Speaking of video game adaptations; I really loved the new #Fallout series. They nailed the feel of the game, but also delivered some fantastic storytelling. It even made me want to play the first two Fallouts just to get a little more understanding of the show.
I loved it and you might too https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0CN4J59BF/ref=butts
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Just watched my son, a major in the 51st Expeditionary Signal Battalion, barking orders at the troops during their casing ceremony. It was weird. I guess every soldier was a kid, once.
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
FTC votes to ban non-compete agreements. They were already non-enforceable in some places (California?), but good thing to have is as a general rule.
I'm a fan of Lina Khan!
https://thehill.com/business/4615452-ftc-votes-to-ban-non-compete-agreements/
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
In text form:
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-announces-rule-banning-noncompetes
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Regarding LB[1]: Here's a copy on youtube if you need slightly better quality video of Lina Khan discussing the FTC new rule regarding non-compete clauses:
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
bagder ("daniel:// stenberg://") wrote:
When in my car, I found myself in my car.