Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
rodhilton ("Rod Hilton") wrote:
This November, you have the power to make Elon Musk waste 180 million dollars.
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
rodhilton ("Rod Hilton") wrote:
This November, you have the power to make Elon Musk waste 180 million dollars.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
otterlove@mastodon.art ("Andy P") wrote:
mods are still asleep. Post more woodcock
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
miona@toot.lgbt ("他の星からMiona") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
rgadellaa ("Roderick Gadellaa") wrote:
In-App Browsers are hijacking our web, and that really needs to stop
https://frontendmasters.com/blog/the-pitfalls-of-in-app-browsers/
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
JubalBarca@scholar.social ("James Baillie") wrote:
*runs in, panting*
Heard the timeline was in desperate need of a baby wild hamster right now. Got here as quickly as I could.
rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest") wrote:
RIP Evelyn Thomas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTDwJEBe21s
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
malwaretech@infosec.exchange ("Marcus Hutchins :verified:") wrote:
The Democratic party has to be hands down one of the most useless political parties in history. The republicans have built a comprehensive 4 year plan to dismantle democracy, meanwhile it's 6 months into the election year and the democrats are still busy eating glue.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
“The Convention Rules Might Decide” - POLITICO
“…the pledged delegates [have] become free agents. They are under no obligation to follow whatever preferences Biden may express — whether endorsing his vice president or calling for an open convention with a “mini-primary” to decide his replacement on the ticket.
What happens at this point is up to the convention itself, which always has the power to adopt, amend or discard existing rules.”
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/20/biden-democratic-convention-nominee-rules-00169821
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
A wise and selfless decision: Biden decides it's time to tend to his fig tree.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/07/21/biden-out/
Reblogged by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz 🖤"):
mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io ("mekka okereke :verified:") wrote:
Two things are still true:
If enough Black people in swing states re-check their registration, and sign up for mail-in voting, early voting, or ballot drop off, then Biden can't lose.
The Dem party has spent significantly more time, money, effort, and attention, trying to get Kamala Harris out of the Whitehouse, than it has spent registering Black voters in swing states or telling them about mail-in voting or early voting. 🤡
The "despair" is unnecessary and self-inflicted.
Reblogged by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
nonfedimemes@wetdry.world ("memes sometimes stolen from outside fedi") wrote:
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
thinking about my brother, who died on this date in 2017. RIP Maj. Larry Sonstein, VMI ‘66. we too were young, once upon a time.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
Bethdlindsay@social.coop wrote:
Cackle cackle cackle. Old tweet but just learned of it. #libraries
Image reads: forget STEM, now I’m all about STEAMED HAMS: science technology, engineering, art, math, humanities, anthropology, music, and such.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
combs@mastodon.art ("Chris Combs (he/him)") wrote:
Here's my latest artwork, an artcade machine named "Insert 25 Cents to Feel Something." If you pay up, it shows you a cat picture on its bulbous, flickering screen, and plays you a silly song with meowing.
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
dbattistella@mstdn.ca ("DB 🇵🇸 🌎🌏🌍") wrote:
Remember this, and all the outrage in the West at Putin's tyranny, and his authoritarian Russian state?
And yet today in the UK five people who on Zoom call discussed blocking a motorway for a few hours, were sent to jail for more than double this sentence.
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
Good morning.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
fugueish@wandering.shop ("Chris Palmer") wrote:
The urge to make a plain HTML, native widgets demo of the DoorDash order page is almost overwhelming. Can you imagine?!
* Accessibility for free
* Fast load (``)
* Fast interaction
* Scrolls in only 1 direction!
* Command+F and other browser affordances work for free
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
molly0xfff@hachyderm.io ("Molly White") wrote:
It’s finally time to release my newest project: https://www.followthecrypto.org/
This website provides a real-time lens into the cryptocurrency industry’s efforts to influence 2024 elections in the United States.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
girlgerms@infosec.exchange ("👩💻 Jess "GirlGerms" Dodson :ferdiverified: :donor:") wrote:
Microsoft Recovery Tool available now, with instructions to assist with the Crowdstrike issue impacting Windows endpoints.
This will require physical access & 1GB USB. You will need admin rights (+ access to the Bitlocker key, if Bitlocker is in place).
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
unintended consequences
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
When I say that COVID is on a technical level fairly easily solvable, we just choose not to - it's things like these that I'm thinking of:
https://www.mpg.de/16075350/1127-chem-ventilation-made-easy-152990
> A simple ventilation system removes 90 percent of respiratory aerosols which potentially include coronavirus particles, from indoor air […] The design is very simple and was implemented using DIY store materials worth about € 200.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
phae@status.fberriman.com wrote:
The guy who ran our heat pump project gave me homemade rhubarb jam in exchange for some dishwasher tablets and this is the only kind of working relationship I'm interested in from now on.
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
Finally shipped a new release of xword-dl, my command line tool to make puz files from online crosswords. Lots of fixes to existing outlets, new support for Puzzmo and Daily Pop, a "preserve HTML" option for formatted clues, and more. https://github.com/thisisparker/xword-dl/releases/tag/v2024.7.20
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The argument for ineptitude is frustratingly strong. Remember when Apple took more than two months to close a cross-site tracking leak that it introduced into *every* iOS browser? Waaaaaaay back in
[ checks notes ]
...2022?
https://fingerprint.com/blog/indexeddb-api-browser-vulnerability-safari-15/
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So the choices here don't have to include giving up on the idea of real online privacy, but we *do* have to understand Apple as either:
- inept re: privacy such that or should *absolutely* not be a sole arbiter of it for a large fraction of users in the web
- a capitalist trying to sell you an expensive new phone by virtue signal...er...marketing
Neither choice involves trusting Cupertino or taking it at face value; no matter how pretty the face it puts on.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So three things can be true at once:
1.) reducing collection can help, and in the short run it can disrupt some of the worst collectors and creepiest re-identification.
2.) reducing collection is not a replacement for privacy laws and will be long-term ineffective in *exactly* the ways Apple's blog post gets SO CLOSE to understanding.
3.) any firm that says "privacy is a human right" but only makes devices for the rich is *lying*
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Apple is *absolutely* spending more in every state and government capital around the world to defeat browser choice than they are to push for real privacy. They're spending *boatloads* more to scupper right-to-repair than they are to make privacy a reality by *killing the model brokers rely on* and legally prevent re-identification without consent.
But boy howdy, those ads. They sure are purdy.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
This is not to say that there aren't problems in the Topics API! Or that the folks who shipped it were fully open to feedback (a lot of good done, but also some fingers in ears). But as with Apple's own privacy-api-cum-tracking-vector, we can expect the first-pass issues to get fixed.
But *both* Google and Apple's efforts are mostly marketing; band-aids to distract from the lack of effective privacy legislation that would get at the real issue: huge pools of data at rest.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Apple markets privacy, rather than providing it. To provide it, they would need to spend the sort of money they splash out on billboards and ads *about* privacy to push for laws that *ensure* it.
They are not doing that.
Which makes chest-beating posts like this from folks that not-so-long-ago added high-resolution fingerprinting surface area to all iOS browsers in the name of "privacy"[1] *extremely* hard to take seriously:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Once again, I cannot recommend enough that web developers fully internalise this blog post by @TheRealNooshu:
https://nooshu.com/blog/2019/10/02/how-to-read-a-wpt-waterfall-chart/