
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
zens@merveilles.town ("Luci for dyeing") wrote:
Full source code for DOOM SNES released
Reblogged by rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest"):
zens@merveilles.town ("Luci for dyeing") wrote:
Full source code for DOOM SNES released
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
cascadepine@mas.to ("Cascade Pine") wrote:
A leaf cutter bee, nomming on some pollen. You can see it’s got three extra eyes on top of its head. I never knew bees had 5 eyes until I took this photo!
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
The Tree is so big that no frame can contain it. There is no way to hold its integral essence in a single picture.
Everyone calls it The Cedar or just the Tree. They say “I’ll be at the Tree” and you don't need to ask “which one?”
The Tree is actually a juniper, not a cedar. It's an Arkeuthos (Αρκευθος), an oxycedrus Juniper I believe, though the subspecies of these trees vary a lot as I’ve learned these days.
Still, we all call it the Cedar.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Good to know that the right-wingers want to quantify our genetics so they can tell us how to act during the day.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/08/03/blood-quantum-is-back-baby/
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Also, without going on too long about this, I think this mindset has also protected me from any sorts of ideas of exceptionalism. Like the idea that certain groups of people can't develop their own tech or something. Just utter bullshit and nonsense. History is rife with independent invention. Much of invention is path dependence leading to a context where a lot of people will have similar ideas. It's foolish to the extreme to underestimate other humans' ingenuity and imaginations.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
However, in my old age, I have also developed a reluctant acceptance of the limits of my own understanding. We can't know everything (no matter how much we *really* want to), but just be careful who you trust when you decide to delegate understanding to somebody else.
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Regarding LB[1]: That is the attitude I've had about computers, but also other things. Computers were the first memory I have of seeing people talking about something as though they were mysterious and unknowable, and that just made me angery and sad for people. People made it. Other people can understand it! To this day, whenever I see somebody more or less say, "Don't worry your pretty little head about that," my gut reaction is, "WTF are you tryin' to pull here?"
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
psypherpunk@hachyderm.io ("PsypherPunk") wrote:
Wonderful article: "Computers can be understood": https://blog.nelhage.com/post/computers-can-be-understood/
"…no single human understands all of the layers…from the transistors and silicon up through …the application code, not even to mention all the network services involved…"—why I am, shall we say, not a fan of the phrase "full stack".
"…engineers I’ve worked with (including myself) who are the most comfortable reading unfamiliar code bases are at risk of habitually undervaluing documentation…”—ouch, that one hurt.
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
View from around Old Dungeon Ghyll.
📷 Pentax KX
🎞️ Kodak Vision3 250D
🔭 Pentax M 50mm/1.7
⚗️ Come Through Lab#BelieveInFilm #FilmPhotography #AnalogPhotography #35mm #TheLakes #LakeDistrict #Cumbria
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
I have a soft in my heart homebrew computers. Things like:
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=6940
Or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC532
OR the many others I've seen. I'd like to add to that list with my own someday. 😄
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
jbenjamint@mastodon.scot ("Ben Thompson 🐕") wrote:
This is quite the read - the fascist (and explicitly Nazi) origins of sex-testing at the Olympics.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
CobaltVelvet@octodon.social ("hinged death kinnie") wrote:
this is it. the ship is sinking.
on 2025-04-03, in 8 months, on its 8 years anniversary, the octodon will be permanently shut down.
use this time to slowly migrate your accounts and download your post archives. tell your local friends who might miss the instance announcement.
the first reply will contain a small list of instances to consider; the second a personal note for my followers.thanks to everyone who supported us, to our crew and members.
i am glad to have built and shared this with you over the years. it was a beautiful horrible adventure. i hope you will remember it as a good place that united so many people for quite a while.it always had to end eventually. for an impulsive little social website, 8 years is a good run. we have witnessed and remember so many friends who are gone. the octodon, too, gets to live impermanence and have a good end while we still can take care of it.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
When a woman accomplishes something, the conservatives will line up to cast doubt on their identity. Every time.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/08/03/as-we-all-know-real-women-lose-at-sports/
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Sometimes reader mode just doesn't quite work for a web page[1], and so you drop into the inspector and add a little something like this in the style sheet:
body {
/* favorite width here */
max-width: 50em;
margin: auto;
}And suddenly it's much more comfortable to read. After over 30yrs of the web, this kind of adjustment is inaccessible on the client unless you've had toxic levels of computer exposure like I have.
[1] https://www.wheels.org/spacewar/stone/rolling_stone.html
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
amoroso@fosstodon.org ("Paolo Amoroso") wrote:
The article "SPACEWAR: Fanatic Life and Symbolic Death Among the Computer Bums" by Stewart Brand of Whole Earth Catalog fame, with photos by Annie Leibovitz, was published on the Dec 7, 1972 issue of Rolling Stone magazine.
It covered hacker culture in the Bay Area, mostly at Stanford and Xerox PARC. The article made PARC widely known, contributed to its myth, and caused some consternation among Xerox management.
https://www.wheels.org/spacewar/stone/rolling_stone.html
https://archive.org/details/19721207rollingstoneexcerptspacewararticlev02
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
liw@toot.liw.fi ("Lars Wirzenius") wrote:
Tyler Cipriani writes an interesting blog post about git credentials:
https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2024/07/31/git-as-a-password-prompt/
Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
VeryBadLlama@mas.to ("Janel Comeau") wrote:
"childless woman" is such a 19th-century-ass insult. what else you got. do I render inferior tallow? do my cabbages grow pale and blemished? does the quality of my sock-darning bring shame upon my father's name?
Reblogged by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
makeworld@merveilles.town wrote:
I fucked up my repo so bad
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
oh, what a lovely weekend project idea @CARROT
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
@rgadellaa ROC's notes on input latency are dead-on. That's the butter that makes the bread worth toasting.
What isn't called out is the role of benchmarks and bespoke macOS ports for pretentious (but underpaid) tech press. That shite murders good projects.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
@rgadellaa - Never sleep on compiler flags or allocators or new OS-level APIs! This is the stuff of battery life and benchmark wins. Nothing makes browsers faster than data locality (we have done *ridonkulous* projects in Chromium on this; AMA), and nothing wins you security like telling system malloc and sandboxing to GTFO
- Hardware acceleration is wicked hard in web-landia because we can't make old sites do good things. But a new engine could set new lines. That's virgin territory.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
via @rgadellaa, I'd missed this insightful post by ROC (who I'm not sure is here?):
https://robert.ocallahan.org/2024/06/browser-engine.html
I'll only add notes to his queries in the thoughtful "Going Beyond" sections:
- You can always best a multi-OS browser on some perf aspects by optimising for a single OS...at least in the short run. Apple manages to do it (at least on power) through private APIs, and a sufficiently funded team can investigate/reverse enough to do the same (on open OSes....so not iPhones).
- (ctd.)
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
It was always "interesting" to me to see that it was reliably the most off-piste, bespoke, hardened, and locked-down configurations of general-purpose OSes (like OpenBSD) that got pwn'd in sweeps. Modern (as in, post 1990) OSes and CPUs just leave too many services hanging out for that not to be true over time, and nobody is djb except djb. So we have to find other ways forward. And seamless upgrades are the most powerful tool invented yet.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
TIL that OpenBSD (my "distro" of choice as a padawan professional security engineer circa '02) is somehow still going. What I learned in those years is the same lesson I learned watching the progression of Windows and the web: when software is situated so tightly on fine-grained contracts that it cannot upgrade seamlessly, it becomes a liability as surely as night follows day.
Anyway, this is WILD to my old self. After 15+ years of not getting it they learned...sot of?:
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
"How can one person possibly be two things?" ask America's men/husbands/fathers/followers of Christ/developers/musicians/marathon runners/kombucha aficionados
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
Abortion is never illegal for the wealthy. Abortion bans are class warfare.
Reblogged by collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth"):
RickiTarr@beige.party ("Ricki Giuseppe Stromboli Tarr") wrote:
"I live in a red state my vote doesn't ma-"
If your vote didn't matter they wouldn't try so hard to make it harder to vote in red states. Voting in red states can turn them into swing states like Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. And voting in blue states can keep them from becoming swing states.
California used to be Red. Texas was Blue long ago. Florida was once a swing state. Obama took Indiana but it's gone redder since. Ten years ago Arizona and Georgia going blue was unthinkable.
Things change and we can make them change.
And that's before getting into more local elections. Turning cities blue, the state legislature.
Red states have flipped blue in recent years at those levels too.
Because people vote, and if we vote in high enough numbers we can turn a tight election into a walk in the park. If we vote in high enough numbers, we can turn a loss into a win. So many good things have happened in states where someone won by like 100 votes. (arizona is one)
-sniperct
collinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
When I say "things are forever ruined and will never again be the same as they once were," what I am specifically referring to is the food quality at Chipotle.
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
Miniver ("Jonathan Korman") wrote:
It is a common misconception that “Mary Shelley” is the name of the novel, when it is actually the name of the novel’s creator
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
TartanLlama ("Sy Brand") wrote:
A wrote a book on how debuggers work!
It guides you through writing a complete native debugger from scratch.
Available Spring 2025 from @nostarch (probably not with this cover)