Mastodon Feed
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
astro_jcm@mastodon.online ("Juan Carlos Muñoz") wrote:
And a closeup shot of the comet over the Llullaillaco volcano:
Mastodon Feed
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
It's interesting the lengths #Meta goes to explain the risks of the #Fediverse, but does not mention that #Threads posts are indexed by Google, thus part of a web with a greater reach than the collection of #ActivityPub instances.
Attachments:
- Google search result: Threads https://www.threads.net › post When will Threads accounts/posts show up in Google search? Feb 14, 2024 - I'm guessing Threads needs to finish up their public API, then Google needs to do some work if they want to make that happen. Missing: meta | Show results with: meta
- Disclaimer before turning on fediverse sharing on threads. Turn on fediverse sharing? Your information will be shared globally with servers not owned or controlled by Meta Other servers can use your information at their discretion. You may not be able to access, edit or delete your data on them in the same way you can on Threads. Learn more Beta • Some features may be limited. You'll see a banner like this in places that are still evolving. You may lose control of your information People on other servers can share your content with anyone. If you delete or archive your content or profile, we can't guarantee it will be removed on other servers. Learn more You can turn off sharing at any time We'll also turn off fediverse sharing if you change your profile to private. Learn more Beta • Some features may be limited. You'll see a banner like this in places that are still evolving.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
this is incredibly cool https://walzr.com/bop-spotter
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
Anyone on Are.na? Or have good example of accounts and channels?
Mastodon FeedReblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
tink@front-end.social ("Léonie Watson") wrote:
On Tuesday 1 October 2024, the UK will become the first major economy to stop using coal to produce electricity, when the last of its coal-fired power stations closes:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y35qz73n8o
Mastodon Feedjsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
and for an initial podcast about us: https://arghstudios.com/podcasts/00_Welcome.wav
Mastodon FeedReblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
jcgregorio@mastodon.cc ("Joe Gregorio") wrote:
Mastodon FeedReblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
joeri_s@mstdn.social ("Joeri Sebrechts") wrote:
@slightlyoff I wrote down the expanded version of this thought in a blog post.
https://plainvanillaweb.com/blog/articles/2024-09-30-lived-experience/
Mastodon Feedjsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
curious about what I've been working on? https://blog.ncoti.org/getting-started/
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
I'm always fascinated by the sub-sets of content creators who form around a specific subject and dissect it to hell.
Lately it's been the Digital Anthropologists and their think pieces on the effect of our digital surroundings.
As a collective, I've been calling these pieces "Theory of Web" or "Theory of *The* Web.*
While each has its own angle, the message is always the same— the web is harmful, the web landlords are harmful, what do we do?
Mastodon Feedcollinsworth@hachyderm.io ("Josh Collinsworth") wrote:
I've been updating this post with new developments since Friday. I expect we'll probably see a lot more happening this week, and I'll try to keep adding on as events unfold. #wordpress
Mastodon Feedbcantrill ("Bryan Cantrill") wrote:
Recently, we made public RFD 463 on the Oximeter query language (OxQL), the DSL that we have developed for querying metrics in the Oxide rack:
https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0463
But was a new language really necessary? On today's episode of Oxide and Friends, @ahl and I will be joined by our colleague Ben Naecker to discuss the origin, state, and future of OxQL.
Join us, 5p Pacific today:
Mastodon Feedcstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
A subset of modern thinking (promoted with ads and marketing, but eagerly adopted by others) seems to be along the lines of "I/We have a problem, but to solve it, why should I/we have to understand the problem or do any work?"
Mastodon Feedcstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Regarding LB[1]: I boosted that essay even though I am only halfway through it as the first half is an excellent summary of the history of software development.
[1] https://ian-cooper.writeas.com/is-ai-a-silver-bullet
(Hopefully the second half won't let me down when I get back to it later.)
Mastodon FeedReblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
lkanies@hachyderm.io ("Luke Kanies") wrote:
Is AI a Silver Bullet? https://ian-cooper.writeas.com/is-ai-a-silver-bullet
Attachments:
- Text Shot: Brooks' hypothesis in “The Mythical Man Month” is that the nature of software development means that no further “order of magnitude” improvements to productivity remain to be found has proven remarkably solid despite forty years of software history. Claims made that LLMs will cause significant changes to software development can be tested against Brooks' argument. (remote)
Mastodon FeedReblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
phil@wears.tigerpajamas.com ("Phil Giammattei") wrote:
In absolute awe of this shitpost by @heydon
https://heydonworks.com/article/css:-a-new-kind-of-javascript/
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
I really like Arca. It's like social media for curators? It's nice. A lot of people sharing really cool stuff from all over the web.
You can check me out on there. I have a couple referral codes if you want one. Just comment.
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
I'm looking for an elegant serif font for my #BearBlog. Any recommendations?
Also, this is my new blog (in addition to fromjason, not as a replacement). I'm challenging myself to post shorter notes with greater frequency.
Maybe those notes get turned into bigger pieces on my main blog idk.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
konnorrogers@ruby.social ("Konnor Rogers") wrote:
Frameworks: "Web components are ruining the web and shouldn't exist"
Web Components: "Yo dawg, leave us alone"
Frameworks: "Damn why are yall being so toxic? It was a well reasoned article."
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
I'm really sad to hear about #Cohost. I was reading through the hashtags and it sounded like it had an interesting culture.
Mastodon Feedfromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
Mark Zuckerberg: “Ship the app” - Internal Tech Emails:
"If Instagram continues to kick ass on mobile or if Google buys them, then over the next few years they could easily add pieces of their service that copy what we’re doing now, and if they have a growing number of people’s photos then that’s a real issue for us." https://www.techemails.com/p/mark-zuckerberg-ship-photos-app
Mastodon FeedReblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
joeri_s@mstdn.social ("Joeri Sebrechts") wrote:
@slightlyoff The frameworks have chosen to build their entire component system outside the DOM, using the DOM purely as an output artifact, and then unsurprisingly struggle to retrofit things that are DOM-first. Web components are a threat to their fundamental assumptions of what the role of the DOM should be, and so they claim it threatens the web.
Mastodon FeedReblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
Trilobyter@mastodon.world wrote:
Clearing out all the past-their-prime zinnias from the front garden bed yesterday and this giant swallowtail showed up and hung around the lantana long enough for me to go grab my camera.
#SilentSunday #butterflies #butterfly #photography #butterflyphotography #insectphotography #ButterflyGardening #gardening
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
2024 JS framework authors and 2024 Frances Ford Coppola share the same technical aesthetic: does any of this technology make sense in context? Nope. Are we all going to pretend it does? Sure. Why? Fantasy.
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
JS framework authors are out here with "web components are a threat to the web!", by which they mean "my priors!"
Mastodon Feedjsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
I love our neighborhood
Attachments:
Mastodon Feedisagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
In the ongoing battle between YouTube and SESAC I kind of find myself wishing for both of the pesky middlemen to lose. I don't know what it would look like, I'm just wishing…
(No need to explain to me how the world works, it's just an emotional post.)
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
We should call Ryan's perspective what it is: platform NIMBYism. Pearl clutching over a non-threat that will, on balance, be good for him too. But he's too invested in the past too see it.
We aren't harming him (or any other framework author) by moving the debate up the stack. We're just declining to subsidise decadence further. Frameworks can create and derive value in the new world too, but holding up progress to make the comparison favourable isn't fair to users *or* developers.
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Something unsaid here that I'd add: the idea that componentry should be exciting, or a location for groundbreaking new ideas (rather than just adding all the obvious stuff to web components at pace) is *wild*.
We have real frontend problems that need solving (looking at you, data sync); the internals of the lifecycle for upgrading angle brackets to JS objects aren't one of them. It's time to move on.
Mastodon Feedslightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Go get 'em, Cory.
https://www.abeautifulsite.net/posts/web-components-are-not-the-future-they-re-the-present/