Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
HourlyOtters@mas.to ("Hourly Otters (New)") wrote:
Here's an #Otter!
Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
HourlyOtters@mas.to ("Hourly Otters (New)") wrote:
Here's an #Otter!
Boosted by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
flaviotorba@mastodon.uno ("Flavio Torba") wrote:
Al di là dei toni poetici, l'articolo esprime esattamente il mio punto di vista.
Se scrivi per puro intrattenimento, hai un problema in vista.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
Always “fun” to see an Icelandic politician complain about “AI threatening Icelandic” when she’s just finished eight years running a government that did fuck-all to address the problem and even exacerbated it by giving “AI” companies free access to massive archives of Icelandic texts.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
cmconseils ("Laura Manach :bongoCat:") wrote:
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
afelia@chaos.social ("Marina Weisband") wrote:
What a terrible time to be capable of imagination.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
Kjaerulv ("kjaerulv") wrote:
'it is extremely difficult to completely stop users from recreating any kind of content that’s in the training data, and OpenAI can’t remove the copyrighted content from Sora 2’s training data because it couldn’t exist without it" #youwouldntsteal
https://www.404media.co/openai-cant-fix-soras-copyright-infringement-problem-because-it-was-built-with-stolen-content/
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
IIRC stock markets in the US tend to rally around the holidays, reality be damned. That should give even the most incompetent time and space to rally their message.
So, no matter how fucked up things look currently I don’t expect the “AI” bubble to pop until some time in 2026 at the earliest
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
mhoye wrote:
Sometimes I like to remember that in 2013 Larry Page said that over 300 million people were using Google+ [300 million people were _clearly_not_ using Google+] and when that whole clownshow was over we all learned that 'using' meant 'what does that button do?' and the average duration of a Google+ session was exactly as long as it took people to see what that button did and then find the back button.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
There really does seem to be a competition here on Threads lately for offering the worst publishing advice.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
I mean I did so
RE: https://www.threads.com/@tim%5Fallaffiliatecash/post/DRGTsVOjp7H
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
kissane@mas.to ("Erin Kissane") wrote:
@bonfire is doing some of the most interesting work on the open social internet, and they're doing it in the most exhilarating ways. I am delighted to be even a little bit involved in the work they have planned:
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
ricmac ("Richard MacManus") wrote:
Kazuo Ishiguro, one of my favourite writers, on AI:
“I think many of us are concerned about the fact that the copyrights were completely infringed.
Our work was being taken, all my books have been taken to train AI, but if the copyrights can be respected then it can be used in a way that, say, a traditional researcher would use somebody else’s book.
Just because it’s AI, it shouldn’t be an excuse to just raid people’s intellectual property.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/kazuo-ishiguro-japanese-windsor-castle-the-king-charles-b2858339.html#
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
futurebird@sauropods.win ("myrmepropagandist") wrote:
If you are interested in purchasing or evaluating the quality of hand bound books here are some of the things I look for as a sign of "high quality"
1. Look at the "headband" this is the place where the pages meet the spine. A headband can be hand sewn, glued, or some combination of both. It's where the skill of the bookbinder really shows. Is it neat? Does it seem durable? Do you like how it looks?
2. Look at the spine. Spines can be flat, rounded, they may feature sewing in some styles.
"| just want a lodge a formal complaint about your Al generated outgoing message. I'm taking my kid to a heavy metal show and I was so excited for him to get to hear the outgoing message. Very sad. Still I will bring my ID and my IQ. Thanks for everything!"
I guess it's Donuts O'Clock in the parking lot. I have been drunk AF (professionally!) but I have *never* been that drunk.
Boosted by jwz:
jplebreton ("JP") wrote:
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-work-for-an-evil-company-but-outside-work-im-actually-a-really-good-person this is good satire and all but fedi actually has people who are in this position. general categories:
- you actively build things that murder or incarcerate people. quit now, or sabotage/whistleblow and accept the consequences.
- you do something not murder-related at a murdering/murder-enabling company. unionize and demand they stop murdering. if after sustained effort that fails, quit.
- you empty trash cans at such a company. your culpability is near-zero.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Jacksonville area people: the folks at @sanmarcobooks have a whole bunch of signed books from me, perfect for your holiday giving (including to yourself!). If you're not in Jacksonville, they also ship, so you have that going for you, which is nice.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Source: me, who writes science fiction and has done, you know, okay with it.
(PS: if you do love romance, hell yes write it. It's a great genre and great community. Also, you can put romance into other genres too! Rumor is romantasy is doing well right about now. Mix and match!)
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
I fundamentally disagree with this thread - not that romance isn't the engine of publishing economics (it very much is), but that you're wasting time writing anything else. Fact is, if you're only writing for money you're less likely to make any. You should love or at least like the subject you're writing to engage readers. So if that's SF/F or thrillers or horror, do that. There's ample audience in those genres for you.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Let's be clear that it's mostly white Americans who aren't ready, that's backed up by the 2024 and 2016 electoral results, anytime white America wants to prove me a liar, I'm ready
Source: NBC News
https://search.app/yD7hZ
If something has a lot of very bad externalities, and just the ones we know about cause major damage to important physical, social and informational ecosystems, then “lots of people want it” just isn’t a compelling argument.
Boosted by jwz:
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:
Mozilla vs. their core audience
Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
maxleibman@beige.party ("Max Leibman") wrote:
I like the phrase “Don’t threaten me with a good time,” because as an introvert, I find few things as threatening as a good time.
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
i0null@infosec.exchange ("Hacker Memes") wrote:
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
Jo@social.sublingual.xyz ("Sublingual Multimedia") wrote:
Pope Francis ate lunch with 2 trans women, leo is having lunch with 4... We can all see where this is going. Pretty soon the pope will be having lunch with 4096 transgender women
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Dig your library decoration, Jacksonville.
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
Ziggie is finally starting to relax here, 9 months after we brought her home from the shelter
WTF ssh.
Recently, I am unable to *interactively* ssh in to my home Mac. "ssh host whoami" works but if I try to get a shell, it hangs forever. ^C, ^Z and ~. don't work. The socket is in ESTABLISHED, and after about 2 1/2 minutes it dies with "client_loop: send disconnect: Broken pipe". The -v log looks exactly like it does for successful connections to other hosts up to that point. WTF?
macOS 14.7.7 running openssh @10.2p1.
https://jwz.org/b/ykxZ
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻") wrote:
You guys I'm like three gym sessions away from almost sort of being JACKED
denschub@schub.social ("Dennis Schubert") wrote:
Now, you can unblock usage of the coding agent by configuring Copilot coding agent as a bypass actor for select rulesets. This allows you to exempt Copilot from specific rules without relaxing your requirements for code pushed by humans.
okay github, this... this is the exact opposite of what makes any reasonable sense, what the heck is wrong with you?!