slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Not my hottest take, but I'll die on the hill that the phrase "production quality" is a judgement about the speaker, not the code.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Not my hottest take, but I'll die on the hill that the phrase "production quality" is a judgement about the speaker, not the code.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
The last sip through my insulated cup is always especially cold. It's like my straw found a little submerged cave.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
The Internet is roasting AI models' maths skills again. This time for not being able to count to 200.
The last time the Internet made fun of AI’s
trouble with math was when someone discovered none of the models could count the numbers of “r’s” in the word “strawberry.”OpenAI and Anthropic responded with a public relations campaign to convince everyone their respective models won gold at the Math Olympiad.
I wonder what they’ll cook up for Count-Gate. https://youtube.com/shorts/PHTHEjfJWks
Boosted by ratatui_rs@fosstodon.org ("Ratatui"):
orhun@fosstodon.org ("Orhun Parmaksız 👾") wrote:
A new terminal AI agent just dropped! 🔥
⚙️ **OpenCrabs** — An AI orchestration layer inspired by OpenClaw
💯 Multi-provider support, 3-tier memory, hybrid search & more!
🦀 Written in Rust & built with @ratatui_rs
⭐ GitHub: https://github.com/adolfousier/opencrabs
#rustlang #ratatui #tui #ai #orchestration #openclaw #terminal
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
bamfic@autonomous.zone wrote:
Sometimes I wonder why this media has such a deep commitment to idiotic both-sides-ism and false balance, then I remember it's been part of the country since the Missouri Compromise and the 3/5ths clause: baked in right from the beginning.
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
jaredwhite@indieweb.social ("Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊)") wrote:
@slightlyoff Somehow (most) software engineering culture in the past came to realize that in many cases you can't simply throw more warm bodies at the problems and solve them faster.
Now suddenly we're throwing "cold bodies" at the problems thinking they'll get solved faster. 😵💫
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
If you dump in a lot of food or chemicals to achieve short-term results, you *might* be able to juice things in the short run for your fish, but you also buy the consequences of a dynamically unstable system under stress.
So when managers assume that they'll "increase productivity" by adding a machine that generates more code, without taking into account the intertemporal effects of *owning* more code (of lowest-common-denominator quality), they're replicating the KLOC fallacy on steroids.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Owning code requires understanding, and one way we keep our fish tanks habitable is to swim; to do the work of moving code and replicating the mental exertion that keeps our *fingerspitzengefühl* tuned.
Replacing that, or pushing it out of balance, creates a different set of intertemporal effects that can quite easily push the system into crisis.
*Ceteris paribus* about AI, as with frameworks, is wish-thinking; our engineering cultures are what we re-make them to be every day, in every way.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
A conversation with a coworker re-triggered an intrusive thought that I find myself returning to regularly while working in a firm in the grips of AI influences:
Teams and engineering processes are like fish in tanks. There's a careful balance of the nitrogen cycle that keeps delicate organics alive; above a certain pH, it's just not plausible to believe things will keep working. But to understand effects, we have to take into account causes and add the effect of time.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
This leads to an appreciation of the toxicity of short-term incentives.
There's a reason I think very, *very* poorly of managers that lean on date-driven delivery: they are consistently externalising costs in ways that they *can and should* appreciate. That takes the form of high-interest unstructured loans against future product and team capacity.
But far too many engineering leaders assume *ceteris paribus* ("all else equal") will hold.
That's not how the fishtank works.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
How ICE became the highest-funded U.S. law enforcement agency (JAN 2026):
"But ICE’s budget has skyrocketed during President Trump’s second term, becoming the highest-funded U.S. law enforcement agency, with $85 billion now at its disposal."
Dems should’ve sacrificed everything to stop the One Big Beautiful Bill. When the dust settles history won’t be kind to them about how they handled the bill’s passing. https://www.npr.org/2026/01/21/nx-s1-5674887/ice-budget-funding-congress-trump
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
bamfic@autonomous.zone wrote:
@hongminhee old fart over here mumbling something about HTML, XHTML, tag soup, internet explorer, Netscape, CSS, JavaScript, and 30 years of brain damage
NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈") wrote:
*sigh* I have in the past been a big fan of Deno. My enthusiasm has waned a bit recently due to a couple issues, but I think this take might be final straw that pushes me into avoiding it by default:
adam@social.lol ("Adam") wrote:
RE: https://cosocial.ca/@evan/116100122651925704
She gets it; Evan doesn’t. We either have consistent and reliable security on the Fediverse or we have a giant federated liability. Solutions with a temporary attack surface are not serious solutions.
And “it’s ok if you don’t get it” is an impressive display of dismissive condescension. @cwebber, I don’t know you, but I’m sorry that you were spoken to like that. It’s gross.
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
chris@video.thepolarbear.co.uk ("Chris Were but on PeerTube") wrote:
Caddy: a great alternative for Nginx
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
long tail
Boosted by jwz:
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
"Incredibly clearly unconstitutional" gets you a 6-3 vote, with the three dissents producing dozens of pages arguing that unconstitutional isn't really so bad.
But 6-3 is better than the other way around.
Boosted by jwz:
danielskatz@fediscience.org ("Daniel S. Katz") wrote:
Every time I see "my substack", I read it as "my blog on a site that helps support Nazis"
NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈") wrote:
@db Oh! Totally missed that! I had piped it to `from json` (in #nushell) and it parsed it without error. I guess it's a bit more forgiving than the standard.
Boosted by jwz:
jamesthomson ("James Thomson") wrote:
Writers: Generative AI models were built on our stolen works, are deeply unethical, and risk devaluing our entire profession.
Artists: Generative AI models were built on our stolen works, are deeply unethical, and risk devaluing our entire profession.
Developers: Wheeeeeeeeee!
Boosted by jwz:
danmcquillan@kolektiva.social wrote:
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
There's a group of young ravens up by the cliffs near town. When I was there earlier this week, a bunch of them were playing chase. #birds #nature #iceland #photos #ravens
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
I've discovered the limits of "dear algo"
Boosted by fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷"):
laurenshof@indieweb.social ("Laurens Hof") wrote:
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
Boosted by Mastodon:
MastodonEngineering ("Mastodon Engineering") wrote:
We're looking for two Backend Ruby on Rails Web Developers to work with us remotely as part of the core team.
Ideally you are:
1. Very experienced with Ruby on Rails
2. Proficient in PostgreSQL, and familiar with Redis and Elasticsearch
3. Experienced in developing maintainable and scalable web backend and API systemsThis remote full-time position requires a 4-hour overlap with the CET timezone.
For more info/to apply: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/mastodon/ac9d4f66-13e8-44d1-bb82-a929ebca8a27
Boosted by jwz:
davidgerard@circumstances.run ("David Gerard") wrote:
A previously on the ball guy calling refusal to use chatbots "purity culture" is like seeing the worm break through the skin.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Cool, where's my tariff refund?
(just kidding, I know I won't get one, and I know prices won't go down either)
Still: good. And a shocking refusal to lick the boot from this normally enthusiastically boot-licking court.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/02/20/us/trump-tariffs-supreme-court
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
ploum@mamot.fr wrote:
I get it, the git-send-mail workflow has a learning step. It’s hard the first few times. But once you are used to it, the "pull-requests-on-web-ui" becomes insufferable.
Dear people maintening a project on Github: please give me an email address to which I can send you trivial patches. The whole PR workflow takes more time than the codïng!
And if enough projects does that, I could eventually ditch my Github account!
adam@social.lol ("Adam") wrote:
Pokémon Day (and the 30th anniversary of Pokémon) is just a week away! Come hang out and chat with other omg.lol Pokémon fans in our #pokemon channel on irc.social.lol!
irc://irc.social.lol:6697/#pokemon