Mastodon Feed: Posts

fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:

Bit of info that wasn’t in the original post—Proton also gave up activist’s backup email addresses to the FBI.

All the backup emails were Proton addresses so, unclear how useful that info was to the FBI.

One of the podcast hosts (Koebler?) also stated that this is the first reported instance of Proton working indirectly with the FBI. So washg they refusing before? https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-404-media-podcast/id1703615331?i=1000754658188

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Nowadays we are hearing constantly about "treating an AI like an enthusiastic junior". I've recently written at a bit more length about why that's not really a good metaphor specifically <https://blog.glyph.im/2026/03/what-is-code-review-for.html> but it also makes an incorrect categorical assumption about people: that there is a clear distinction between "junior" and "senior" people, which just isn't true. You might think it's a spectrum, and of course any cutoff will be arbitrary, but even that's wrong. It's multiple spectra.

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Trying to wring some useful insights out of the roiling AI discourse: today I want to talk a little bit about Senior Engineer Essentialism. As with many AI Coding things, this is not a *new* problem, but it is now a *worse* problem.

According to my hazy recollection, circa 2012 we started seeing a rash of forgettable blog posts about "what it really means to be a senior software engineer".

There is no such thing as a senior software engineer. 🧵

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Not a ton of novel analysis here or anything but I just have to share because

“I don't know anyone who's like ‘Yay, I love the prospect of a world where my job is paying a monthly subscription to a worse version of my own brain.‘”

is sufficiently 🔥 that it warrants sharing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mISCcAtIYOc&t=398s

Boosted by jwz:
charliejane@wandering.shop ("Yoko's Asterisk 🏳️‍⚧") wrote:

I woke up this morning and chose violence

https://buttondown.com/charliejane/archive/let-firefly-stay-dead/

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
3psboyd ("Matt Boyd") wrote:

How am I supposed to get any work done when the world is falling apart AND Slay the Spire 2 is in early access?

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

getting a lot of email may be unfortunate but getting these types of numbers in OmniFocus is literally tragic, it is inherently a hell of one's own making, the downfall that naturally follows hubris

Boosted by jwz:
sinbad@mastodon.gamedev.place ("The Seven Voyages Of Steve") wrote:

I saw a young person ask ChatGPT how long their flight was today when they were literally holding the boarding pass with that information on it in the same hand that had the phone in it. ChatGPT spat out about 4 paragraphs on the subject when the answer was “40 minutes”. What a time to be alive

Boosted by jwz:
babe@glitterkitten.co.uk ("tiddy roosevelt") wrote:

Forgot to add the new paintings, now they've got frames on

soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:

(If you don't get the reference, don't worry about it)

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

I started buying guitars, which is an approved, valid third choice, and started posting cover songs to YouTube, where they are heard by dozen of people.

https://youtu.be/vK3PwAC4dsU?si=3sJKMGucXdbH5oeB

RE: https://www.threads.com/@batsalad/post/DVzyWlxDL86

soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:

Age verification law destroyes the E2EE cryptosystem

#meta #instagram #facebook #surveillancecapitalism

Boosted by jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi"):
jococruise@threads.net ("JoCo Cruise") wrote:

Congratulations to Oscar winner and JoCo Cruise 2026 featured guest Mark Sonnenblick!!! 🏆 #oscars #golden
#oscars

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

physics (pronounced 'fuzzics')

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

I'VE COME TO TALK WITH YOU AGAIN

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
grimalkina ("Cat Hicks") wrote:

My friends here in San Diego who are R1 scientists, leading some of the most successful labs in their areas in one of the world's densest regions for scientific and medical innovation use words like: broken, bleak, devastating, nihilistic. Half the people I know who worked on equity & science topics have stopped posting publicly about it or producing scicom on it after experiencing too much stress and burden for their safety. Even *left* social media foments rage spirals and pileons

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
Daojoan ("JA Westenberg") wrote:

Conservatives built an economy that requires two incomes to do what one did and then blamed women for going to work

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND

typst ("Typst") wrote:

helene started clickbaiting her followers here into Typst. When that did not work, she noticed the tremendous amount of note takers and is now exploring how #Typst could be their best solution:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-Q7r7Y%5FwBg

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:

Office 365 and Copilot are down.

Run. Now's your chance. Don't look back; just GO

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
gvwilson ("Greg Wilson") wrote:

@mhoye my brother used to say that if you're not willing to walk away from the table, you're not negotiating: you're begging.

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
AlSweigart ("Al Sweigart") wrote:

When you use LLMs to code something, are you using diff to compare the changes the LLM gives you?

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
qgustavor@urusai.social ("Gustavo") wrote:

I found @soatok's argument for E2EE encryption in this post quite interesting:

End-to-end encryption doesn’t just protect the users, it protects the people operating the infrastructure. And that’s why it still matters.

That's pretty much the only reason why http://mega.io/ is end-to-end encrypted: the previous Kim Dotcom project - Megaupload - was seized by FBI and hadn't E2E, making it a easy target. MEGA's encryption isn't good (source: me) but it's good enough to avoid making them an easy target for law enforcement.

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

how is Figma the "industry standard"

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

... or, like, i'll immediately discover something else that was hiding waiting to surprise me...

not that that just happened, obviously 😬

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

bittricks: refactor done, at least for amd64. aarch64 still to do.

$ git diff HEAD | wc -l
4046

oops.

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

“The Final Boss”

https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-final-boss/

> I've said repeatedly (but didn't articulate into any open mic at the meeting because I still very much feel like a new New Yorker), this recent push for "AI" is yet another grandiose and grotesque experiment on children – one that no one asked for and few want. Another grandiose and grotesque experiment on all of us.

fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:

Giving the suite away for free, at least in the beginning, is a brilliant move that will convince a lot of us to switch from owners to renters.

BUUUUT, even if the rent is currently $0, you signing up for the "New Affinity," at some point, means giving up the old paid-in-full versions of Affinity (if not now, definitely in the future).

fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:

I'm a diehard Affinity Design user. Adobe got too exploitative so I ditched them. I paid-once for Affinity Designer, and never looked back.

Pre-Canva Affinity is well-designed and capable software. It doesn't require the cloud to work; no unnecessary "cloud sync" expenses. No training AI with my work. No subscriptions. My relationship with Affinity ended when I clicked download (though I do follow them on social media).

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

__has_c_attribute(gnu::ifunc) technically does what you ask of it, but is not helpful if your libc does not support ifuncs.