Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
She looks so fluffy in this picture. She is actually quite small and lean.
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
She looks so fluffy in this picture. She is actually quite small and lean.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
nasser@merveilles.town ("Ramsey Nasser") wrote:
so just to be totally clear AI is "democratizing" programming by taking something that used to free to do and making it so you pay a subscription fee to an American corporation to do it while being barred from ever actually understanding how it works, am I getting that right?
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
MIA turned third-world, victim of American imperialism, war-torn-country into an aesthetic which I could never decide if it was based or problematic. lol
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
Relatively new, but this Cranberries cover by Royel Otis scratched a fold in my brain that I didn't know itched.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
It was only posthumous that we identitied the "indie sleeze" micro genre, but no song captures that better than One More by Eliphant and MØ, imo.
If this was your energy on 2015, I deeply regret to inform the audience that I was into it.
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
I'm on a good algo run of old songs I love so I'm starting a thread.
Down on Life by Elliphant has the best lyric intro of all time—"We are waking up in a pile of shit"
Oh go on.
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
hejchristian ("Christian Alder") wrote:
What folks can do in CSS these days never css to amaze me 🤩
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange ("abadidea") wrote:
angry? understandable. but before you send an angry @ to a stranger on social media about politics, maybe double check:
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
jk ("josef") wrote:
i go away for just a few weeks and now im getting Suggested Preprocessor Directives
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
Zed editor pros - why is fisher price css spinning up? how do i purge this and never see it again?
Boosted by jwz:
mhoye@cosocial.ca wrote:
I have to admit I'm enjoying OpenAI's progression from "we're building the future of synthetic sentience, we will be the birthplace of a new silicon hypergod, everyone better watch out" to "well, artificial general intelligence is kind of hard to define, maybe that's not a useful term" to "we can't figure out how to make any money selling people personally-tailored pornography generators so we're turning their chatbot girlfriends off."
I'm looking forward to their next big innovation!
Boosted by jwz:
codemonkeymike@fosstodon.org ("Mike :nixos:") wrote:
For many people, the #Linux vs #Windows vs #Mac debate is a privilege — it assumes you can choose. But working with the Computer Upcycle Project, I've seen the real choice is often Linux vs no computer at all.
~95% of donated computers are "too old" for Windows 11 or macOS. Linux installs on them anyway, adding 10+ years of life to machines #Microsoft and #Apple called trash.
This isn't Linux vs Windows. It's Linux vs e-waste.
Ban adults from the Internet instead of kids. Logan's Run Now. I await the sweet embrace of Carousel.
Boosted by jwz:
eschaton ("Chris Hanson") wrote:
@jwz Too late, I now own butlerian-jihad.org
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
nice pixels can i get some alt text i don't read jpeg artefacts
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
lacroixboi@beige.party ("presentdad🙋🏻♂️") wrote:
shoot for the moon and if you miss you are not a good moon assassin
Boosted by jwz:
fredy@tacobelllabs.net ("fredy cosmoline :tblverified:") wrote:
americans don't understand how right-wing Top Gear was in its original context because we have no frame of reference for how abnormally evil you have to be to be a Car Guy in england. imagine you're surrounded by steam engines and yet you go out of your way to like cars
Boosted by jwz:
eschaton ("Chris Hanson") wrote:
We need to start building a list of Open Source infrastructure projects (and project forks) that categorically reject contributions from LLM slopmongers, so we know what’ll be safe to keep using and contributing to in the long term.
That’s a good task for the Butlerian Jihad.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
joelle@social.joelle.us ("Joelle") wrote:
There are fake ICE videos circulating, because people want the clout or whatever.
Please verify scary shit before you re-post it. Non-citizens in the USA are scared enough already with actual things happening, we don't need to forward fiction around.
Is it posted by an actual news org you recognize? If not, is it a legit immigrant organization? Or is it a random wannabe influencer you've never heard of who posted the video? Think before you repost.
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
phae@status.fberriman.com wrote:
TiL you are opted-in by default to Copilot training on your data in GH. The toggle to turn that off is here: https://github.com/settings/copilot/features
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
It goes without saying that I wouldn't try to use anticompetitive tactics to prevent competing browsers from making safe, interoperable versions of them available. The embarrassment!
Obviously, it would stand beyond the pale to use standards process jockeying to get my way instead. It would only serve to highlight the incoherence of allowing native apps access.
Obviously.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Apropos of nothing, if I were a company that was both an OEM and OS vendor, and I didn't want the web to access various device sensors, I would just remove those sensors from the devices I sold and the APIs my OS exposed to native apps.
But that's just me.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
yossarian@infosec.exchange ("yossarian (1.3.6.1.4.1.55738)") wrote:
I once again feel vindicated in believing that there’s a perfect negative relationship between companies being serious security vendors and having names like CYBER SHADOW GLOCK
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
SnoopJ@hachyderm.io wrote:
@whitequark biblically accurate sysadmin
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
jacob@jacobian.org wrote:
I do believe that people can change, and that there can (and should) be a path back to good standing in a community.
But that path needs to involve taking ownership of the harm they caused — even if, heck especially if, they’re no longer a person who would do those things. And they need to at least attempt to make amends in some way.
Without these things, I’m not going to be able to assume good intentions of someone trying to come back.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
Physical security and cryptography can learn from each other, part 11367:
Hotels wisely don't put the room number on guest keycards so if someone finds your card, they'd have to exhaustively search the hotel to find the room it opens.
Some hotels now have elevators programmed to only let you call the floor for which your keycard is coded, preventing guests from wandering to other floors.
But it also means the elevator can be used as an efficient oracle to determine the floor of a found key.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i just learned where a phrase i've been using for many years - below the fold - comes from.
OHHHH
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
Mariah Carey has a lost punk album and I want to listen to it so bad
Boosted by jwz:
mediaarchaeologylab@post.lurk.org ("media archaeology lab") wrote:
(no)
RE: https://mastodon.social/@glyph/116287575482074849
this was a subtoot of roughly half a dozen people, some of whom have (with no direct interaction) now blocked me, so mission accomplished I guess