dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
oh yeah i have half a CI system from that time i was going to make a CI and then gave up because github actions happened and you can't compete with microsoft.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
oh yeah i have half a CI system from that time i was going to make a CI and then gave up because github actions happened and you can't compete with microsoft.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
tfw your brain fills in the rest of the toot before you've stopped reading.
except your brain was wrong. your brain was funnier.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
aren't my lungs supposed to feel better though? cause i still feel bunged up with some sort of cold-shaped device
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
well i have been frightfully productive in terms of housework (displacement activity) while giving up smoking (~48h).
i have written 0 code though.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
if you think safety's expensive, try having an accident
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
streetartutopia@mastodon.online ("Street Art Utopia") wrote:
Sideshow Bob by Marquitos Corvalán. <3 When Nature Become Art (17 Photos): https://streetartutopia.com/2026/03/30/nature-made-in-to-street-art/
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
hamishtpb@mewblog.thepolarbear.co.uk ("Hamish The PolarBear") wrote:
Just passed my driving test!!
Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
lunareclipse@snug.moe ("luna the doggie :neofox_snug: :therian:") wrote:
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
cmconseils ("Lady Laura :bongoCat:") wrote:
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
So, serious questions. I keep seeing people in tech talk as if they don’t see the difference between indexing media to aid in the discovery of said media and indexing it all to replace it and deprive the creators of revenue.
Is it really not obvious to people in tech why people in the arts and creative industries might be fine with the former but extraordinarily furious about the latter? Or that the legal framework surrounding the two might actually be different?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
me: why are all these times in the middle of the night?
oh they're in australia
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
how does one get endorsed for idris crimes?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
first interview this year, mind. that's how well the market's going.
it's... it's because i'm an idris liker.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
holy crap i've got an interview
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange ("Brian Greenberg :verified:") wrote:
I teach cybersecurity. And I genuinely don't know what to tell my students after this one. Federal reviewers spent years trying to get basic encryption documentation from Microsoft for its GCC High government cloud. They couldn't get it. One reviewer called the system a "pile of spaghetti pies," with data traveling from point A to point B the way you'd get from Chicago to New York: a bus to St. Louis, a ferry to Pittsburgh, and a flight to Newark. Each leg is a potential hijacking. They knew this. They said this out loud in writing. Then they approved it anyway in December 2024, because too many agencies were already using it. 🔐 That's not a security review. That's a hostage negotiation. Two things in this story should make every CISO and CIO uncomfortable:
🧩 Microsoft built its federal cloud on top of decades of legacy code that it apparently can't fully document itself
👮 "Digital escorts" often ex-military with minimal software engineering backgrounds are the firewall between Chinese engineers working on the system and classified U.S. networks 🤦🏻♂️The scariest line in the whole ProPublica investigation isn't the "pile of shit" quote. It's this: FedRAMP determined that refusing authorization wasn't feasible because agencies were already using the product. Read that again. The security review process reached a conclusion based on sunk cost, not risk. Ex Post Facto Fallacy
If that logic holds, the compliance framework is just documentation theater. And right now, CISA is being hollowed out, so there are fewer people left to even run the theater.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/03/federal-cyber-experts-called-microsofts-cloud-a-pile-of-shit-approved-it-anyway/
#Cybersecurity #Microsoft #FedRAMP #Leadership #RiskManagement #security #privacy #cloud #infosec
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
gloriouscow@oldbytes.space wrote:
the Wikipedia article on the light pen is pathetic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light%5Fpen
we will be expanding this
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
gloriouscow@oldbytes.space wrote:
does archive.org really need a 4800 dpi scan of all sides of the box?
no, probably not.
is it getting a 4800 dpi scan of all sides of the box? yes. yes it is.
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
seanwbruno@infosec.exchange ("Sean 🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷") wrote:
@gloriouscow hard disagree.
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
gloriouscow@oldbytes.space wrote:
i am sorry i am making the fediverse worse
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
gloriouscow@oldbytes.space wrote:
so a utility to tell you if your light pen is working okay would be useful right?
it would tell you if your pen is ok.
what might such a utility be named
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
RE: https://mastodon.social/@Ameboid/116316993709442818
I want everyone to see my cartoon son.
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
here's your weekly reminder that Git is not Github, you can leave the circus any time
https://notes.zachmanson.com/copilot-edited-an-ad-into-my-pr/
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
nileane@nileane.fr ("Niléane") wrote:
RE: https://nileane.fr/@nileane/116291641538524981
The Verge is doubling down and it's a good one to read and share 👌
https://www.theverge.com/report/901818/hbo-harry-potter-jk-rowling-transphobiaEspecially to your cis folks who are still somehow arguing that it's possible to watch something that’s directly funding a worldwide fascist crusade against trans people without being a part of the problem.
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mastodonmigration@mastodon.online ("Mastodon Migration") wrote:
One for the history books...
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
reading: "You're Looking at the Wrong Pretext Demo"
https://denodell.com/blog/youre-looking-at-the-wrong-pretext-demo(scroll past the slop - the man has six fingers ffs)
also highly relevant: "You Know What? Just Don’t Split Words into Letters"
https://adrianroselli.com/2026/02/you-know-what-just-dont-split-words-into-letters.htmlalso tangentially relevant:
https://dbushell.com/notes/2026-02-18T12:52Z/
Boosted by jwz:
ghibli@beep.town ("Studio Gifli") wrote:
Boosted by jwz:
th@v.st ("Trammell Hudson") wrote:
The Curta won't grind the beans but it will compute that 21g coffee x 15:1 ratio = 315 ml water
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Not a surprise that @43081j's post on JS ecosystem bloat is *extremely* kind and patient towards the people who are polluting the Node/NPM corpus, so I'll say what he won't: if the people who are promoting the bloat can't produce live customers demanding forward-compat for a ancient runtimes + modern dependencies, we all need to shun and reject these sorts of net-negative contributions:
https://43081j.com/2026/03/three-pillars-of-javascript-bloat
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
reading: What Is CSS Containment and How Can I Use It?
https://csswizardry.com/2026/04/what-is-css-containment-and-how-can-i-use-it/
— my prayers were answered! Harry explains all 🙏 for my next wish...
zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán") wrote:
I can't believe the number of people who have gone off the deep end with a slight upgrade to M-x doctor