Mastodon Feed: Posts

Boosted by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
gruff@stroud.social ("Gareth Kitchen") wrote:

I too cheered!

Facebook et. al. had it coming, didn't they?

The fallout from this could actually be very, very bad. I didn't appreciate the detail.

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/26/everyone-cheering-the-social-media-addiction-verdicts-against-meta-should-understand-what-theyre-actually-cheering-for/

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

Yuuuuuuup

RE: https://www.threads.com/@annazarves/post/DWnB%5FaVFZu9

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
blogdiva ("your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield/116332497422486698

this is digital blackface and racist as fuck.

whomever is doing this knows Black people are THE Culture; so how swell it is to make money off Black culture without Black people?

and don't get me started with the fact that automata are proxies for SLAVES.

don't hesitate to call out Alphabet/Google/Youtube for making money off Black digital slaves.

this isn't progress. this is still baldfaced racism.

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
PugJesus@piefed.social wrote:

Nomenclature means it's not an empire, right?

https://piefed.social/c/historymemes/p/1942758/nomenclature-means-it-s-not-an-empire-right

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
Jdm2@boriken.social ("jdm2 🇵🇷") wrote:

Puerto Rico’s Coasts Are for the People, Not a Playground for the Rich

Boricuas say ‘De Aquí Nadie Me Saca’ as they fight the Esencia megaproject

https://thelatinonewsletter.org/p/puerto-rico-coasts-for-people-not-playground-for-rich

#PuertoRico

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
sarahjeong.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy ("sarah jeong") wrote:

eventually someone in journalism will use AI in their work in a way that is legitimately impressive but by then the word will be so embarrassing that people are gonna have a whole set of euphemisms to avoid the connotation that they used AI to do the writing

pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:

A nice old-fashioned space launch to the Moon. It's been a while.

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/04/01/artemis-2-successfully-launched/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGBoVotHqIE

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

right, i think it's time to go to bed.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

NASA think they can show the field of sofware development up by having a perfect launch.

but joke's on them, they failed to fit a working toilet filter.

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
riley@toot.cat ("Riley S. Faelan") wrote:

@tekhedd Furthermore, the sort of people who would say things like "It's bad optics." with a straight face, as though it's an argument, tend to be exercising magical thinking. Outside its proper context.

@soatok

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

in other news, they are openly having trouble hiring at their budget. they explained this is because they budget for two trips around the world to head office each year out of the salaries and i wasn't surprised this made it difficult.

adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁") wrote:

The future of UX is green: On the Web Sustainability Guidelines | 2026 | Talks | Events | W3C

A look at what the W3C’s new Web Sustainability Guideline are and how to apply them in practice.

https://www.w3.org/events/talks/2026/the-future-of-ux-is-green-on-the-web-sustainability-guidelines/

#sustainability #smallweb #smolweb

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

achievement unlocked: i convinced an australian i'm human at 1am.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

NASA launches "bond style" "spacecraft"

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

okay it is almost 1am. i am now to pretend to be human shaped until i pass out, hopefully after australia have determined i am human shaped.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

approaching 10,,000 miles per hour

yeah okay that's quite even faster

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

5000 miles per hour

yeah okay that's quite fast

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

launch is in 3 minutes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3kR2KK8TEs

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

the second between 10:00 and 9:59 of the countdown to artemis launch is longer than the last 3 minutes on a washing machine cycle.

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
mwl@io.mwl.io ("Michael W Lucas :flan_on_fire:") wrote:

This writer never uses AI.

The purpose of AI is to produce minimally viable text.

My purpose is to produce text that expands your mental foundations to be more skilled and more compassionate. Tech book, fiction, doesn't matter, that's the goal.

These purposes are incompatible.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

so which aerospace company is responsible for today's impending fuckup?

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
inthehands@hachyderm.io ("Paul Cantrell") wrote:

A whole lot of our present moment boils down to resource cost externalities — externalities that in many society has intentionally created.

We made carbon emission and water use way too cheap, and we pay dearly for it every day.

/end

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

practicing talking to australians before interview

g'day sheila, didja throw a shrimp on the barbie while you were losing the ashes?

Boosted by jwz:
sfbaykeeper@sfba.social ("San Francisco Baykeeper") wrote:

BREAKING: After a multi-year court battle, we've won a major case over bacteria pollution in the South Bay!

A court has ruled that Sunnyvale and Mountain View are responsible for over 1,200 Clean Water Act violations--and must stop pollution from reaching local creeks: https://baykeeper.org/press%5Frelease/court-rules-that-cities-pollution-of-local-creeks-violated-clean-water-act/

#sunnyvale #mountainview #waterpollution #bacteria #bacteriapollution #cleanwateract #southbay #stevenscreek #calabazascreek

Boosted by jwz:
pikesley@mastodon.me.uk ("CYBER_RISK_MITIGATION_REMINDER") wrote:

INTERCAL: We have keywords like PLEASE and IGNORE because we think it's funny

Anthropic: We have PLEASE and IGNORE *baked into our source-code* because we have no fucking idea how this thing works

Boosted by EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️"):
caroline@chaosfem.tw ("Caroline Kinlund") wrote:

@EmilyEnough warmly friendly, assertive, broken at least half of the time? checks out

Boosted by EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️"):
2legged@mastodon.ie ("Claire McNab") wrote:

EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️") wrote:

Macrumors keeps using this color scheme in its iOS 27 stories, did I miss a report that Siri is a lesbian in iOS 27? Good for her.

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

Accurate

https://theonion.com/study-97-of-all-sounds-infuriating/

isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:

Eventually the AI industry believes "we will develop similar practices around unread code"[1].

They don't know how, they just believe.

It might even work out, given the amount of talent thrown at it. But right now nobody knows.

But what I'm saying is that "lol this code's a mess" is not such a slam dunk you might hope.

[1]: https://www.heavybit.com/library/article/write-only-code