dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
there is so much on the youtube that i don't even know how to make sense of
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
there is so much on the youtube that i don't even know how to make sense of
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
okay i can confirm that 'energy harvesting' is not entirely a good youtube search term if you want to know about ultra low power electronics
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
non-human governors harvesting energy from human fear?
not sure if crank or comedy
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
There is also not much to figure out for the rest of us. The technology is purpose-designed to remove people from the equation, much like a handgun is purpose-designed to remove people from existence. Any "figuring out" about either tech will only result in variations on their purpose
What we need to do is strip back the tech, go back to the drawing board, and figure out how to reinvent it practically from scratch to be more human. /fin
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
There is no rebuilding, no constructive potential for "AI" without political reform, both in the US and in Europe. The motivation behind the tech still remains: powerful people want to take things away from society
The people who funded and drove today's "AI" will have the resources to figure out how to make the tech affordable after the financial bubble pops. They're the ones who will have the resources to figure things out about LLMs, not us.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
They were built for this goal—fewer humans, less accountability—and will always be problematic no matter who is in charge and always always be a risk as long as the "shitty people" have power
In the modern history the "shitty human beings" have always retained power and influence after bubbles pop, from Reagan onwards. The bubble builds up wealth and power, they keep it after it pops, and use their influence to get in on the ground floor on the next one.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
Generative models and automated decision-making systems are political projects. They are tools for fencing off sectors of our society for rent, for cutting back on education and healthcare for the poor, for removing accountability. They are inherently tools for removing humans from the equation. They are not neutral in their design. Their existence has a political purpose
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
I've been seeing people say the harms of "AI" comes from shitty people, not the tech and that the shitty people will go away after the bubble pops. While the first part is true in the strictest sense (contrary to claims, these are not autonomous systems) it's not really true in a practical sense. The harms are designed in and the "shitty human beings" won't go away.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (good kind)") wrote:
but assuming we're not in coordinator mode, the prompt that instructs the main LLM to create an agent with the prompt text to create our statusline script is emitted, and if that works, then an agent will be run with the statusline system prompt, which is awesome.
So the prompt tells the LLM to modify the
$PS1variable in the shell configuration. for those non-computer touchers out there, thePS1variable is the thing that customizes "what happens before my cursor on the shell line" - it's what makes it so sometimes it shows that folder you are in, and how people make their terminal look very fancy.So the prompt text includes a whole fake JSON string that says "write a function that receives these kinds of parameters and then returns a whatever"
observe the prompt text in first image's description of fields and then the description on the claude code docs website. notice that they are ... different!!! like where is the
costfield in the prompt description? the docs give a whole example of using this, but if you were to invoke it via the slash command, then it would just have no idea how to do that. the only way this succeeds is by virtue of the fact that the llm is just generating the most likely text anyway and so the odds of any of this succeeding are just "that some script that calls some variables with some maximally likely names represent some value that is maxmially likely, based on the training set prior."
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i thought they were supposed to be stopping with all this segregated cores nonsense? or did they just stop segregating cpu features for different cores?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
lol, nova lake's mobile parts with performance cores, efficiency cores and low power efficiency cores
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
should beginners still learn to code?
probably not, but mostly because programming as a career will not take care of them.
Boosted by jwz:
netblocks ("NetBlocks") wrote:
⚠️ Update: #Iran's internet blackout is now the longest nation-scale internet shutdown on record in any country, exceeding all other comparable incidents in severity having entered its 37th consecutive day after 864 hours.
Boosted by jwz:
gleick@mas.to ("James Gleick") wrote:
“Experts are dubious.”
Boosted by jwz:
rmi@cloudisland.nz ("Rob Isaac") wrote:
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
on the swiss cheese risk model
in this case, the barriers seem to have been mostly holes
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
cave of alibaba and the 40 thieves
lots of tax being collected in the port then?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
the smoke had also begun to crackle
this isn't funny, fires only do this when they're distressed
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Twenty-five years ago, aggressive antitrust action made safe, interoperable, tax-free computing possible, and the web delivered, unlocking economic opportunity at the pace browsers got more powerful.
Today's regulators (and the press that cover them) are not following in the footsteps of that blockbuster success. A look at why:
https://infrequently.org/2026/04/the-web-is-an-antitrust-wedge/
Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
pennywhether@mastodon.online ("Pennywhether") wrote:
@chris Even just watching YouTube is pretty meh now. I basically don't go there anymore. So much of the long form stuff there is a paint by numbers session in appeasing the algorithm. Very predictable. I'd rather see stuff from people doing these things for themselves and anyone who wants to come along for the ride. More genuine. It's why I've enjoyed your stuff all these years regardless of the direction you've taken things. Keep doing what resonates with you. =)
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
cosmos4u@scicomm.xyz ("Daniel Fischer") wrote:
By popular demand here is the full-moon-lit night image of Earth from #ArtemisII in a rotated (NW now up) and zoomed-in version, now directly from https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/hello-world/ - the technical data has https://nitter.net/Erdayastronaut/status/2040105622046118282 and there is also a version with much shorter exposure at https://nitter.net/NASA/status/2040114101670523381 and a half-Earth at https://nitter.net/NASA/status/2040114160529179103 while the view with the window frame is at https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e000191
Boosted by jwz:
SFFMagazineCovers@zirk.us ("SciFi/Fantasy Magazine Covers") wrote:
Creepy no. 95 (1978)
The caption says "gorilla" but honestly they look more like chimps to me? And to complicate things we have "See Evil! Hear Evil! Speak Evil!" which inverts the three wise monkeys.
This cover does its job perfectly, because you want to read the story.
Original magazine: https://archive.org/details/warrencreepy-095
#Magazine #MagazineCover #PulpMagazine #PulpFiction #ScienceFiction #Fantasy #Horror #Art #Illustration
Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
MikeDunnAuthor@kolektiva.social wrote:
Why are there no photos of the bombed out AWS data centers? Asking for an everybody.
So much winning.
I see we are at the "US Navy base in Virginia asking for donations of toiletries" stage of the victory lap. Sailors have been arriving in Norfolk, Va., home to the world's biggest naval base, since at least the middle of March....
https://jwz.org/b/yk5w
Boosted by jwz:
Cdespinosa ("Chris Espinosa") wrote:
Has a Defense Secretary ever been fragged by his own men? Asking for historical reference
Boosted by EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️"):
alex@tech.lgbt ("Alex R") wrote:
It'd be nice as an industry to have something in between 'vibe coding' and 'artisanal burnout'
Boosted by jwz:
mitch@mitchwagner.com ("Mitch Wagner") wrote:
soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:
I was reminded this evening of the time /r/programming kept removing people's links to my blog, so I took out a Reddit ad to spite them.
And left the comments on.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
maxleibman@beige.party ("Max Leibman") wrote:
“There’s no way to put the genie back into the bottle,” insist AI boosters about a product that the industry is spending more than a trillion dollars a year to keep out of the bottle.