Mastodon Feed: Posts

soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:

I can't wait until I can share what I'm working on x.x

Boosted by jwz:
johnzajac@dice.camp ("John") wrote:

So when these liberals wander around demanding that we leave the "echo chamber" (the fact-based world, in this instance) so we can be considered "reasonable", and in doing so find themselves defending *PLANET-DESTROYING TECHNOLOGIES CREATED BY CARTOONISHLY EVIL ROBBER BARONS*, it's not aberrant: it's how their ideology works.

They will *always* push back on moral thinking to make space for evil, because *that's the core idea behind their politics*.

And they think it's noble.

9/

Boosted by jwz:
johnzajac@dice.camp ("John") wrote:

To a liberal, "reasonableness" isn't a practice, a function of critical thinking, or even the result of a well considered heuristic.

It's a fetish.

Yup; just like some people like to suck on toes, liberals like to be "reasonable". It toots their horn to be "the only adult the room", to the point where they'll notice a consensus forming and scream

"WAIT A MINUTE obviously the *correct* and *adult* answer is ~somewhere in between~!!!!!"

This happens literally on *every issue*.

2/

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

single-use food

Boosted by jwz:
astro_jcm@mastodon.online ("Juan Carlos Muñoz") wrote:

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
ajroach42@retro.social ("Andrew (Television Executive)") wrote:

On the fediverse especially, but on *every* social media platform to a greater or lesser extent, the things that other people see are determined by how much time and energy you put into the things you see.

Lift folks up. Share good things. Give oxygen to good things.

We don't have to talk about prominent British transphobes and their problematic media, or american mega corporations and their mediocre reboots that they use specifically to avoid paying royalties to animators.

We can instead talk about @dilmandila and his short films ( https://tv.dilstories.com/c/shortfilms/videos ) and documentaries ( https://tv.dilstories.com/c/documentaries/videos ).

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

we should teach horses to climb mountains like they do in skyrim

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
chirpbirb@meow.social ("taco, bird/cat :verified420:") wrote:

open source software developers are getting fed up and are finally recognizing that they can just fucking leave.

• the owner of nvim-treesitter gets a really shitty comment from a user saying that the update to a required version broke their workflow
• the owner replies saying "hey just pin what you need instead of mainlining it if you need this for an older version"
• the shitty user replies back saying "go switch to something that doesn't require interacting with people"
• the owner says "OK." and ARCHIVES THE REPO

https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/discussions/8627

like, holy shit, what a power move.

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:

I've been burned so many times; I've learned my lesson. You really need to read each of these things carefully if you want to understand what the researchers are concluding. Reading a news article—even worse, just the headline—is at best no information, at worst disinformation.

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart") wrote:

I am begging AI researchers trying to study human impact to get very rapidly better at methodology so I don't constantly read halfway through these papers only to find some ridiculous experiment design that will throw the conclusions into the air.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

LOL, i am heavily amused by the idea there is a single day in the office where Jayz2Cents isn't being absolutely bullied to shit by his employees.

Boosted by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
html5test@front-end.social ("Niels Leenheer") wrote:

Smoke machine powered by CSS!

Fully based on web platform tech, such as WebUSB for the DMX connection and CSS for controlling everything.

My projects can sometimes get a little bit out of hand. Want to know more? Come see my talk at @btconf

https://beyondtellerrand.com/events/dusseldorf-2026/tickets

Attachments:

• video: 9d065339f7e3e002.mp4

ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕") wrote:

Had a look at the Carnival of Transport in Coleford during my break. Some nice old cars, but what soured it for me was the neonazi bikers that showed up, and some goon waving an American blue lives matter flag.

Boosted by zkat@toot.cat ("Katerina Marchán"):
jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net ("Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:") wrote:

TIL (Today I learned) that writing websites with simple HTML and CSS is now called "post-framework". Well. I did "post-framework" even before frameworks existed and I never stopped writing that little bit of HTML and CSS needed for static pages myself. I guess I'm so old that it is considered being young again :) (frantically adding "20+ years of experience and practice with post-framework web design" to my CV ;)

1/4

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

roller coaster tycoon's overengineered puking system

remember the old days when people used to engineer stuff?

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

well shit this guy's got his mouth open it must be good

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange ("Sophie Schmieg") wrote:

And the posts, they keep on coming.
I hundred percent agree with @filippo here, the question is not whether we're certain that a quantum computer exists by 2029, it's whether we're certain that one doesn't exist. And things have progressed far enough that non-physicists, or even physicists working in different subfields, can no longer reliably tell what's going on.

https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
HollyCo26588808@universeodon.com wrote:

Scientists Discover Lab Gloves Are Skewing Microplastics Data – Perhaps By A Lot

https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/scientists-discover-lab-gloves-are-skewing-microplastics-data/

#goodnews #goodearth #science #plastic #pollution #research #Michigan

Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
xssfox@cloudisland.nz ("1.3.6.1.4.1.61513") wrote:

> Posts on Mastodon are not end-to-end encrypted. Do not share any sensitive information over Mastodon. Instead use https://forum.warthunder.com/

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
PavelASamsonov ("Pavel A. Samsonov") wrote:

LLMs have no concept of "true" or "good." But they are trained to signal high-quality work. Meanwhile, bosses are pressuring workers: go faster, produce more, let the AI cook.

Study after study documents what this does to the human brain: cognitive surrender. We're "in the loop" but the bot calls the shots.

Read more in this week's issue of the Product Picnic newsletter:

#LLM #AI #UXDesign #tech #softwaredevelopment #software

https://productpicnic.beehiiv.com/p/ai-mandates-are-a-demand-for-cognitive-surrender

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io ("Human Brain Enthusiast") wrote:

“How may the compulsive programmer be distinguished from a merely dedicated, hard-working professional programmer? First, by the fact that the ordinary professional programmer addresses himself to the problem to be solved, whereas the compulsive programmer sees the problem mainly as an opportunity to interact with the computer. The ordinary computer programmer will usually discuss both his substantive and his technical programming problem with others. He will generally do lengthy preparatory work, such as writing and flow diagramming, before beginning work with the computer itself. His sessions with the computer may be comparatively short. He may even let others do the actual console work. He develops his program slowly and systematically. When something doesn't work, he may spend considerable time away from the computer, framing careful hypotheses to account for the malfunction and designing crucial experiments to test them. Again, he may leave the actual running of the computer to others. He is able, while waiting for results from the computer, to attend to other aspects of his work, such as documenting what he has already done. When he has finally composed the program he set out to produce, he is able to complete a sensible description of it and to turn his attention to other things. The professional regards programming as a means toward an end, not as an end in itself. His satisfaction comes from having solved a substantive problem, not from having bent a computer to his will.”
—Joseph Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason, 1976

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
mathew@universeodon.com wrote:

https://amiatechbro.com

(No, I very much am not.)

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

This is old news, but I just found out x86 picked up a crc32 machine instruction somewhere along the way (Nehalem?), but it uses a fixed polynomial, so... Why? I wonder what particular customer made the suggestion. 🤔

chipotle@mstdn.social ("Watts Martin") wrote:

New post: ""How are you leveraging AI in your technical writing?"" https://coyotetracks.org/blog/leveraging-ai-in-writing/

It's a question I expect to be asked in the future. I have an answer, but I can't help suspect it's the wrong question.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

hmmm... wwdd?

if i were dysfun i would simply invent a new branch of maths on top of bayesian statistics to give a language to talk about such things in.

and i am dysfun, sooooooo.....

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i think the answer is bayesian statistics.

you know, the analytical alternative to neural networks?

soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:

Another day, another annoying person to block

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
johnzajac@dice.camp ("John") wrote:

Scott Jensen's concern, in a nutshell, is the abuse and harrassment that AI propagandists have to face here, on Mastodon.

His concern about the unethical, immoral, and destructive externalities of yes, even "local AI models"? His concern about the deliberate, strategic conflation of ML applications like medicine and materials development? Protein folding? Physics modeling?

Apparently not urgent enough to even mention.

No, it's the propagandists receiving rudeness he finds alarming.

3/

adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁") wrote:

I try a new Fediverse client using only HTML and basic CSS (no JS). It is written in PHP

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
dave@alvarado.social ("Dave Alvarado") wrote:

BYD is absolutely bonkers with proving they understand their entire process. If I could buy a BYD car, I would.

> When defective cells appeared, Wang asked: “Have you found the root cause?” If yes: “Can you reproduce it?” Then the demand: “Make one hundred cells with exactly the same defect. If you can reproduce the failure one hundred times, identically, then and only then have you understood the mechanism.”

https://www.fastcompany.com/91519302/byd-nail-test-why-this-54-billion-innovation-is-terrifying-western-auto-executives