Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
wdlindsy@toad.social ("William Lindsey :toad:") wrote:

"One thing that I love of what's happening right now is the Pope is not speaking as a political figure or as a politician. What he is doing is quoting the scriptures ans exposing these hustlers like Paula White and Franklin Graham and all the rest of them who have been hijacking the scriptures to pump this guy up and justify all their evil, their wickedness that they've been doing."

#Trump #PopeLeo #PaulaWhite #FranklinGraham #narcissism #WhiteChristianNationalism #MAGA
/3

Mastodon Feed

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

So to follow up on this, I've caught it in action. Models, when quantized a bit, just do a bit more poorly with short contexts. Even going from f32 (as trained) to bf16 (as usually run) to q8 tends to do okay for "normal" context windows. And q4 you start feeling like "this model is a little stupid and gets stuck sometimes” (it is! It's just that it's still mostly careening about in the space of "plausible" most of the time. Not good guesswork, but still in the zone)

And then at Q2 (2 bits per parameter) or Q1, the model falls apart completely. Parameters collapse to zero easily. You start seeing "all work and no play makes jack a dull boy” sorts of behavior, with intense and unscrutinized repetition, followed by a hard stop when it just stops working.

And quantization is a parameter that a model vendor can turn relatively easily. (they have to regenerate the model from the base with more quantization, but it's a data transformation on the order of running a terabyte through a straightforward and fast process, not like training).

If you have 1000 customers and enough equipment to handle the requests of 700, going from bf16 to q8 is a no-brainer. Suddenly you can handle the load and have a little spare capacity. They get worse results, probably pay the same per token (or they're on a subscription that hides the cost anyway so you are even freer to make trade-offs. There's a reason that subscription products are kinda poorly described.)

It's also possible for them to vary this across a day: use models during quieter periods? Maybe you get an instance running a bf16 quantization. If you use it during a high use period? You get a Q4 model.

Or intelligent routing is possible. No idea if anyone is doing this, but if they monitor what you send a bit, and you generally shoot for an expensive model for simple requests? They could totally substitute a highly quantized version of the model to answer the question.

There are •so many tricks• that can be pulled here. Some of them very reasonable to make, some of them treading into outright misleading or fraudulent, and it's weirdly hard to draw the line between them.

Mastodon Feed

pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:

Paperwork submitted. I am officially unemployed as of April 2027.

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/04/14/its-official/

the end

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

The slides for the talk with all of the references. Lots of worthwhile reading there

https://faculty.washington.edu/ebender/papers/Bender-ISU-2025.pdf

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

"Resisting Dehumanization in the Age of "AI": The View from the Humanities, Emily M. Bender"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7Lc6QNxolQ

> What if we had a bunch of money that came in from tobacco interests? Would we have a series of grants to explore how tobacco can enhance teaching and learning?

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

RE: https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/116397605266279416

It's a bit of a trope to say "this is an important talk" when somebody tackles an sombre topic, but this is genuinely an important talk on the acceleration of dehumanisation enabled by "AI" and how we can resist it, all wrapped in a decent overview of the discourse so far, from a leading expert in the field

Mastodon Feed

jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

this is most excellent, a sign of growing software maturity:

https://mastodon.social/@benpate/116403046724832335

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
benpate ("Ben Pate 🤘🏻") wrote:

Have you seen this news?

#Mastodon just got funding to add end to end encryption into their software.

So, some time next year, you’ll be able to send truly private messages to the vast majority of the #Fediverse

Im so excited about this.

Because it’s an open spec, this opens the doors for every Fediverse app to join the party.

Yesterday, this project was a proof of concept. Today, Mastodon has turned it into a stampede.

#E2EE

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
MikeDunnAuthor@kolektiva.social wrote:

Today in Labor History April 14, 1816: Bussa led a slave rebellion in British-ruled Barbados. Because of this, he is remembered as the first national hero of Barbados.

#workingclass #LaborHistory #slavery #rebellion #racism #barbados #bussa #BlackMastodon

Sketch of a flag used by the Bussa rebels including the slogan "Happiness Remains for Ever with endeavourance... Britannia are happy to lead any such Sons as endeavourance and God Always saves endeavour" By The National Archives UK - God always saves endavour, No restrictions, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=20461497

Mastodon Feed

jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

Trump is claiming a "blockade" of the Strait of Hormuz, but this appears to be true only for some definitions of "blockade"... if your ship is connected to the PRC, for example, then there is apparently no "blockade" in place at all.

an attempt at a quiet "nod nod, wink wink" TACO move? or just, once again, action/reaction that was not actually thought through? I can no longer tell.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/14/world/middleeast/us-blockade-strait-hormuz-iran-ships-traffic.html?rsrc=flt&unlocked%5Farticle%5Fcode=1.a1A.Wtei.-98nSQOP3ED8&smid=url-share

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by GuillaumeL@hachyderm.io ("BigSaur G"):
paul_denton ("Nils Wilcke") wrote:

Macron isolé, la purge a débuté avant 2027: ses conseillers se pressent pour quitter l'Elysée et les téléphones sonnent dans le vide. Et une enquête sur la première année de mandat de Ferrand au Conseil constitutionnel. Le macroniste bouscule l'institution, au risque de l'affaiblir? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=447Pq6JPPxw&t

#Politique #ConseilConstitutionnel #Macron #Compol #Justice #Droit #RH #Elysee #Presidentielle #Guerre #Eglise #Vatican

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

okay bear with me here but if you get NaN, you done fucked something up already. personally i'd rather know instantly, but if you want your data to be silently corrupted, why not just use NaN as the null value?

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

hmm i wonder how much people would hate it if NaN and null were interchangeable

Mastodon Feed

adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁") wrote:

What's new in #SmolFedi v1.0.11 the html/css/no-js fediverse #smolweb client :

  • Register/Unregister to new posts on profile page
  • Manage follow requests
  • Add Favourites, Local and Federated timelines
  • Manage post moderation : mute/unmute thread / report post
  • Manage user moderation : mute/unmute block/unblock report
  • Allow hr tag in html post (thx daj)
  • Add poll posting
  • Define session handler (compatibility)
  • Add info 'follows you' in profile info page
  • Permit post edition
  • Manage word filters
  • Simplify page width system
  • Permit to mark media as sensitive
  • Add search form

Source code of smolfedi

Demo instance

Mastodon Feed

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

He's not the antichrist. The antichrist wouldn't be that stupid.

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

does anyone have numbers on NaNboxing overhead?

Mastodon Feed

ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕") wrote:

Me and Drew are playing a little Div on #Owncast

https://live.freebooters.uk/

Mastodon Feed

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

RE: https://toot.cafe/@baldur/116402441445902779

This but also ratcheting up quantization to reduce cost.

Mastodon Feed

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

UK/EU web devs - have you noticed US business enquiries have gone quiet in recent years, or is it just me, did I scare them away?

Mastodon Feed

Mastodon wrote:

We’re happy to share that Mastodon has been awarded a service agreement from the Sovereign Tech Fund @sovtechfund 🎉

This covers five major initiatives through 2026 and 2027. We are very grateful for this support. Read about the details in our blog post.

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

RE: https://live.acarsdrama.com/@acarsdrama/116402682761183769

even pilots are fed up of javascript

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

hypothetically, where would one start if one wanted to add a new index type to postgres?

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i kinda feel like i should learn enough verilog to design an actually good SIMD ISA

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
Baa@mk.absturztau.be ("Baa 🐑") wrote:

@mica

Drawing of a bunch of rabbits inside a burrow with the text "There are tunnels underground where bunnies feel safe - safe from kubernetes."

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

(There are some additional nuances to this, but not as much as you’d think. The “AI” vendors are astoundingly bad at a lot of basic stuff, so as the use of a specific tool grows they have a strong tendency to shit the bed on scaling. But anybody who has been paying attention to LLM user discourse on social media and Reddit has seen the above cycle happen a number of times now, with all of the major vendors.)

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@nerdpr0f/116398784891083900

We had bullshit coverage of this on RÚV here in Iceland, our national broadcasting service that was mostly just end to end bullshit and hype

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jcoglan wrote:

RE: https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116401934993867994

it's fun how genAI has people going "well now architecture and code review are even more important" and you look at the vendors' own code and it shows no evidence of either

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
stavvers@masto.ai ("Another Angry Woman") wrote:

dirty talk like llms

in 20 years people are going to have to dirty talk like LLMs in order to satisfy partners whose first exposure to sexuality was chatbots "not only is your dick huge, it's also sexy!" Excellent work! That isn't just a sexy pic — it's a love-letter to the genre of erotic content.

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

The seven step “OMG! My AI tool is suddenly degrading” cycle:

1. An LLM tool is released. The company claims it’s a miracle that will change everything

2. Early adopters try it on straightforward tasks, find it seems to work, though they don’t really check it. “OMG! It’s a miracle that will change everything!”

3. Adopters apply it to an increasing variety of tasks. Some work; some don’t because the tool is still fundamentally random

4. Novelty wears off and error reports start

1/2

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

5. Company announces that they are working on the next gen “this time we really mean it” tool

6. “OMG! They must be intentionally degrading their old tool to sell the new one!” (No, what you have is a stochastic piece of shit that sometimes works out of luck and you suffer from a mind whose only mode of thinking is a whatever confirms your existing biases.)

7. The co releases the next gen and the cycle starts again

2/2