Mastodon Feed: Posts

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

@NfNitLoop yeah i had a quick look but it seems to make some odd choices i'm not entirely behind

NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️‍🌈") wrote:

@dysfun *any* JIT engine? https://luajit.org/luajit.html comes to mind. (I only have experience with Lua, not LuaJIT directly.)

Boosted by adam@social.lol ("Adam"):
neatnik@tv.neatnik.net ("Neatnik TV") wrote:

Neatnik is live!

Coding, Server Stuff, and More!

#web #programming #chat #fun #neatnik

https://tv.neatnik.net

Attachments:

• gifv: Live stream preview

Boosted by jwz:
tef wrote:

turns out being told "you're right!" 30-40 times a day is roughly equivalent to being kicked in the head by a horse 3-4 times a week

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i had a quick look around for a jit engine usable from c and the best i've turned up is QBE

adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁!") wrote:

#SmolFedi is a lightweight, no-JavaScript Fediverse client written in #PHP.

v1.2.2 is available

• Better postion of the reply panel in thread of discussion
• Better semantic tags usage
• Add accessibility details (aria)
• In api, manage X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining, and X-RateLimit-Reset from the headers
• Add account prefs choices : Default CW message, Reveal all content warnings, Show all sensitive media
• User profile edition
• Add [bot] marker in bots profiles
• Permit to view full size avatar from profile page. Add title to avatar images
• Stay on the same page (when possible) when switching account. Stay on the same page when answering a poll
• Follow/unfollow hashtags
• Manage filters (create/delete) in prefs
• Display instance Announcements

Source/Download

Demo instance

#smolweb #fediverse

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
fugueish@wandering.shop ("Chris Palmer") wrote:

"I’m sorry this industry took a heel turn. The shittiest of heel turns. It absolutely sucks. But you should take solace in the fact that whatever it might have done to you, it didn’t take away your desire to be useful. It didn’t kill your desire to help others.

You get to keep doing the thing you love.

Now do it for people who will love you back. This is the work."

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
gwynnion ("Nowhere Girl") wrote:

"With Claude, I can write 25,000 lines of code every day!"

Okay, but you see how that's bad, don't you? I'm not a programmer and I know that's bad!

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

I am not good at being an influencer

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

thank you to the one (1) person who purchased something that was probably pretty expensive from one of my amazon affiliate links that resulted in a $12.07 gift card, the first one I have seen in… not sure, maybe 18 months? I almost forgot I was enrolled in this

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

Should I make a generative "AI" that runs locally called "ShatBot", but is just a beefed up Markov/Eliza thing? :thonking:

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

With all this *sigh* ongoing LLM BS, I wonder how long until we get to a concept of copyright/pay it forward offsets. You know, copyright washing of some kind. "When you pay for a subscription to ShatBot AI, a portion of your fees goes to a fund that is used to pay royalties and support open projects and scholarships ."

Then later on, we find out all of it was lies, and the people that were supposed to get paid, if they get paid at all, end up with pennies and no scholarships were provided, but certain people definitely have more yachts, houses, and cars.

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
aparrish@friend.camp ("allison") wrote:

like... the cost of a single "state-of-the-art" llm training run would be a permanently institution-changing amount of money for your average computer science department (to say nothing of depts in CS-adjacent fields, especially in the arts and humanities). the claude mythos result, even if you take anthropopo's claims at face value (which: don't) seems indicative of this, like, yeah if you toss nine figures at security research, you're gonna find some exploits?

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
aparrish@friend.camp ("allison") wrote:

i guess fundamentally i'm not convinced that whatever amount useful functionality has emerged from generative AI (and i think the jury's still out on whether that amount is non-zero) couldn't have been achieved in more cost-effective, equitable and sustainable ways by having taken the money and resources we've shoveled into gen AI and investing them elsewhere

("sustainable" in the sense of environmentally sustainable but also "can we keep this in a working state" sustainable)

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

The music my brain keeps on as background noise has been flipping back and forth between an 80s song and a more recent song by Wet Leg and I think its staring to create a mashup. I wish I had the skills (and time) to figure out if it would actually sound okay outside my head. 😆

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
meg@fediscience.org ("Megan ⚘") wrote:

I love data challenges and this sounds like a great one from NASA, but I wonder what these competitions are like now in the age of vibe coding. Since it is human research, I sincerely hope they are looking for human solutions.

https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci/nasa-artemis-ii-human-research-data-methodology-challenge/

#Artemis #DataScience #NASA #OpenScience #Science

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Eniko Fox") wrote:

and for the record i'm not talking about making code to create art like a game or something. i'm saying *the code itself* can be art. a perfectly constructed api, a framework that fits together just so, when code comes together in a beautiful harmony, *that is art*, it requires artistry to create!

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
dreid@wandering.shop wrote:

There is something deeply offputting about watching engineers who have made cool stuff in the before times desperately pleading with models not to make everything worse.

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
MarkHoltom@mastodonapp.uk ("Mark Holtom (aka Kingbeard)") wrote:

Imagine getting the brief to write some copy on a fucking bin bag and then smashing it out of the park like this. Sensational effort.

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
abraxas3d@defcon.social ("Abraxas3d") wrote:

Arcanum: Phase 1 of an Open Source Conformal Method of Moments Antenna Modeling Software is Complete

The NEC input parsing and phase 1 (geometry) are finished and pass unit tests, with the work that the community has done so far. This is an excellent achievement, but it needs to stand up under the sort of testing and expectations that someone exactly like you, a person reading out of interest in open source wire antenna models, would demand. In other words, it better work for you too!

Before we start phase 2 (electrical analysis), now would be a good time for amateur radio enthusiasts to try cloning the repo, reading the CONTRIBUTING.md, and making sure that the development tools can be set up as described and that you can run the tests and examples. This needs to happen without unnecessary pain or blockers.

If you are up to giving it a shot and want to try this out, then it would make a very large difference. Why? Getting things right now pays off big later. Getting things right now means that the development environment and phase 1 results act right for you in the long term. It means that someone that does not have direct or insider knowledge of the design, and doesn’t have anything set up in advance, can directly benefit. If it works for you, and passes tests, then we have met a major milestone.

Try it out and let us know how it works for you. Interested in contributing to phase 2? Welcome aboard!

https://github.com/OpenResearchInstitute/Arcanum

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
csaetre@techhub.social ("Christine Sætre-esque") wrote:

Love this.
A peer reviewed blank page was published in 1974, without revision.

The unsuccessful self-treatment of a case of “writer's block” by Dennis Upper.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-497a

Credit: Found this gem via ‘stephenknowstuff’ on another platform
#writersblock #academicchatter

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
aburka@hachyderm.io ("aburka 🫣") wrote:

RE: https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59/116424709251813699

if "like that" includes:
- enclosure of the commons in violation of copyright and licensing
- destroying the environment
- creating a massive economic bubble
- poisoning open source codebases
- rotting the brains of those who use it
- turning software development from a skill you can build into a utility you have to rent

then yeah, I'll unapologetically say "not like that"

Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hic3jjoT%5FCU

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
timixretroplays@digipres.club ("Tim 🎮") wrote:

⚠️ Heads up - there's a #Mastodon #scam bot doing the rounds. Mastodon does not "temporarily restrict your visibility" - that is simply not a thing here.

If you see a DM or post to that effect begging you to click a link to restore anything, do not click it - report it instead.

Boosted by adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁!"):
loremipsum@s.cafe ("Lorem :playstation:") wrote:

A poll to any admins who are self-hosting their own xmpp
what is your server running?

#xmpp #jabber #conversations #selfhosting #poll

jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

US Constitution, Article VI, Clause 3:

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

period. no other mention is made of religion in the main body of the Constitution. Secretary Whiskey Pete should read this, as I think he may have been stoned or asleep that day in Middle School "civics" class.

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dgar@aus.social ("Dgar") wrote:

•

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
Neotheta@finfur.net wrote:

Collar of Shadows 🖤 Speedling for Ash fearuring Novus

#furryart

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
bascule@mas.to ("Tony “Abolish ICE” Arcieri🌹🦀") wrote:

Shamir's Third Law in action: cryptographic systems are typically bypassed, not penetrated.

"We beat Google’s zero-knowledge proof of quantum cryptanalysis"

Exploits subtle memory safety and logic bugs.

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/04/17/we-beat-googles-zero-knowledge-proof-of-quantum-cryptanalysis/

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk ("Neil Brown") wrote:

Just let me compute in peace.

https://neilzone.co.uk/2026/04/just-let-me-compute-in-peace/

#blog