db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
solid advice: avoid GoDaddy https://vale.rocks/micros/20260427-0430
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
solid advice: avoid GoDaddy https://vale.rocks/micros/20260427-0430
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
sure but humans need what, 2000 calories? AI is low energy only needs a teaspoon of unicorn farts
when you do the maths it makes practical sense to bludgeon the humans into unicorn feed
Boosted by jwz:
RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu ("Radical Graffiti") wrote:
"All you had to do was pay us enough to live"
Pasteup seen in Nashville, Tennessee
Boosted by jwz:
RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu ("Radical Graffiti") wrote:
"Hate Cops"
Seen in Vancouver, Canada
Boosted by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
silvanomarioni@mastodon.uno ("Silvano Marioni") wrote:
Il National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) del Regno Unito raccomanda le passkey come standard di autenticazione, sostituendo le password tradizionali. Sono più sicure e semplici, eliminando l'obbligo di ricordare password complesse.
@sicurezza
https://buff.ly/VYTuS8N
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
spocko@mastodon.online ("Spocko") wrote:
Trump telling O'Donnell "I'm not a rapist. I am not a pedophile" is the new "I am not a crook"
#uspol #60Minutes #Trump #WHCA
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
oh lord it's Monday
NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈") wrote:
1973: “I am not a crook.”
2026: “I didn’t rape anybody.”
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
dangillmor ("Dan Gillmor") wrote:
Ad usual, count on Will Bunch for the context you need but rarely get in Big Journalism. https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/trump-dinner-shooting-violent-america-20260426.html?id=aILEqJvkLG2qH&utm%5Fsource=social&utm%5Fcampaign=gift%5Flink&utm%5Fmedium=referral
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Also I recognize I'm in an extreme minority among authors, almost all of whom have day jobs and/or side gigs and/or partners or families whose financial situations offer them support. This is the same for most creative professions. The arts of any sort are a tough gig.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
2010 was the year I could live entirely off income from books, that income being advances and royalties. That was 10 years after my first book came out and 5 years after my first novel. Prior to that freelancing and corporate writing paid my bills (and my wife's income was our safety margin). It helps I'm a bestselling author and I release a novel a year, so the income is relatively steady.
Boosted by jwz:
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
So Ford holds the record for shortest interval between assassination attempts. But Trump and Reagan almost certainly hold the record for presidential assassination attempts in closest geographic proximity to one another.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
encthenet@flyovercountry.social ("John-Mark Gurney") wrote:
I'm seeing some weird behavior with FastAPI and async.
I have a function:
```
async def foo(r=[]):
if r: return r[0]
r.append(someobj())
return r[0]
```Now I have that declared on a route via the usual:
```
@router.get('/somepage')
async def get_somepage(foo : Annotated[someobj, Depends(foo)]):
xxx
```But in the foo function, I print the id of the r list, and each time somepage is fetched, the list is different.
I did finally just move r into the module name space, and that fixed things. But it's pretty clear that FastAPI is doing something wonky with function calls.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
Rob_T_Firefly@masto.hackers.town ("Rob Vincent 🎙️") wrote:
"A Tribute to Attribution" - Chainsawsuit by Kris Straub, November 23, 2011. (15 years later, even in the Fediverse, some folks out there are still like this.)
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
NorthBayPython@social.northbaypython.org ("North Bay Python") wrote:
#NBPy 2026 ran at a loss this year. It's a public service and we'll be back in 2027, but we could use your help closing the budget gap.
Donate at https://nbpy.link/donate
Boosted by jwz:
piquant00@mastodon.online ("Ann K.") wrote:
This one takes the cake. 🍰
#USpol
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
You know what's infuriating? Cleaning spring thyme leaves off it's thin, fragile stems!!! #cooking
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
CAT DRAMA
And that's a wrap for the talks! Thank you for bearing with me for this liveblogging experiment; I hope I got those edits to add the hashtags in quickly enough that those of you filtering were not spammed :). #NBPy
*YOU CANNOT CONTRIBUTE IF YOU NEVER REST*
(emphasis mine)
"What about the 'all this'?"
"The time we live in… is… interesting…" [slide of dumpster on fire floating in flood waters]
what if it *was* your circus and they *are* your monkeys?
- Does it affect a lot of entities in your space? Reach out to form a team.
- Ask for input *in places where you're likely to get useful feedback*.
- when: is this coming with the heat death of the universe? maybe skip it. next week? pay attention.
- where: is it happening in your ecosystem? sometimes reading 200 posts for some other unrelated project might not the best the next use of your time.
- why: was it a huge malicious change that is likely to be followed by more changes by that same actor? or is it just part of the general drift of the industry.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
This crossbill showed up on my balcony, so I grabbed my camera. Unfortunately it still had the wonky manual soviet lens on amd a polariser in the wrong position so this is all the documentation you’ll get
How do we decide what's important?
Let's ask ourselves: who, what, why, where, and how?
- who: there are some people we don't have to pay attention to, and there are some people who are always saying the same thing. but if there's a source that's reliable, maybe that's somebody we should pay attention to?
- what: does this source sound plausible? the last decade has really stretched this, but there are still limits: teleportation, even to waffle house, remains unlikely
There are many things you don't have to care about:
- somebody who doesn't work on your project thinks that you're doing it wrong
- "you're a bunch of SJWs! code should not be political" [see previous advice re: bedspread]
- "you removed my emotional support bug"Lots of stuff you just don't have to care about; even if they are mentioning your project specifically by name. You have a limited amount of time in the day, and on this earth.
"[The PSF] is basically office hours as a service now"
Is the wrongness on the internet in a place that you control? If so:
- exercise moderation controls
- slow down posting
- "pew pew" (which I assume is the sound of a ban); people really love it when you do this on the internetif not:
- take a deep breath
- close the computer
- go outdoors
- chew up some grass and cough it up on the bedspread
"Some of these people on the internet are so wrong. Like *so* wrong, that it makes you mad."
Especially when they are discussing your project.
But if someone is very wrong on the internet, someone *else* will tell them where to stuff it. So you don't have to!
as you might imagine from the title, I am really not going to do this talk justice without capturing the visual component