dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
remember that Zen was AMD's comeback. it took them 5 gos to actually make a vaguely acceptable cpu. and it draws too much fucking power.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
remember that Zen was AMD's comeback. it took them 5 gos to actually make a vaguely acceptable cpu. and it draws too much fucking power.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
AMD before Zen2 only has 128-bit vector execution units anyway,
thanks AMD.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
tommorris ("Tom Morris") wrote:
When someone tells me we need to replace unpleasant American surveillance tech with the exact same thing but open source and hosted in a data centre in Brussels.
My heart swells with pride when we can get the drone murder decider running on a GPU in a Welsh AI growth zone with a picture of the Queen Mother on the side. It’s very important that human rights are undermined by your own government rather than a foreign corporation, after all. #SovereignTech
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
alineblankertz@indieweb.social ("Aline Blankertz") wrote:
"AI" is a huge redistribution scheme from the bottom to the top. It pays off for the billionaires no matter how big the bubble is. All we can do is limit the damage.
Pointing out the lack of profitability of "AI" products is pretty much meaningless. Investors have been speaking about this for years WHILE making billions from their investments into "AI". It is profitable for them, and that is what they care about.
I wrote about this already some time ago:
https://www.structural-integrity.eu/crashing-hard-why-talking-about-bubbles-obscures-the-real-social-cost-of-overinvesting-into-artificial-intelligence/
Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
jneen@unstable.systems ("jneen collective") wrote:
half the point of programming-tool design is to reduce the need for hypervigilance on the user.
if we're designing tools that require you to be *more* hypervigilant, legitimately what use are they?
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
RE: https://mastodon.acm.org/@mxp/116475436932395582
“LMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate”
https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15597
> Our large-scale experiment with 19 LLMs reveals that current models degrade documents during delegation: even frontier models [...] corrupt an average of 25% of document content by the end of long workflows
The only use case that didn't show catastrophic degradation was coding, although bear in mind that this only attempts to benchmark degradation and doesn't assess design, reliability, or quality of the output.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
aaaaanyway, i have come up with a wonderful trick which would work marvellously on zen 5 without a great deal of effort. but less marvellously on zen 4 and i have no fucking clue how well intel's doing with avx512 anymore.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
these things are insidious because the way you're told to deal with ISA support is to ask is it supported with cpuid or something. and so you ask and it helpfully says "yes, i support that". it doesn't say anything about whether it's dogshit slow.
and how do you work that out? glad you asked:
- know the bug exists at all, somehow
- implement a fallback
- sniff the processor model and switch between the two implementations.
- have a few of these stack up, give up and choose which architectures to penalise.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
Gather/Scatter slow on AMD's Zen4 implementation.
thanks AMD, another fucking performance bug to work around
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
my own hopeless cheeriness is starting to stretch a bit thin
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
solid advice: avoid GoDaddy https://vale.rocks/micros/20260427-0430
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
sure but humans need what, 2000 calories? AI is low energy only needs a teaspoon of unicorn farts
when you do the maths it makes practical sense to bludgeon the humans into unicorn feed
Boosted by jwz:
RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu ("Radical Graffiti") wrote:
"All you had to do was pay us enough to live"
Pasteup seen in Nashville, Tennessee
Boosted by jwz:
RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu ("Radical Graffiti") wrote:
"Hate Cops"
Seen in Vancouver, Canada
Boosted by keul@fosstodon.org ("Luca Fabbri"):
silvanomarioni@mastodon.uno ("Silvano Marioni") wrote:
Il National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) del Regno Unito raccomanda le passkey come standard di autenticazione, sostituendo le password tradizionali. Sono più sicure e semplici, eliminando l'obbligo di ricordare password complesse.
@sicurezza
https://buff.ly/VYTuS8N
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
spocko@mastodon.online ("Spocko") wrote:
Trump telling O'Donnell "I'm not a rapist. I am not a pedophile" is the new "I am not a crook"
#uspol #60Minutes #Trump #WHCA
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
oh lord it's Monday
NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈") wrote:
1973: “I am not a crook.”
2026: “I didn’t rape anybody.”
Boosted by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
dangillmor ("Dan Gillmor") wrote:
Ad usual, count on Will Bunch for the context you need but rarely get in Big Journalism. https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/trump-dinner-shooting-violent-america-20260426.html?id=aILEqJvkLG2qH&utm%5Fsource=social&utm%5Fcampaign=gift%5Flink&utm%5Fmedium=referral
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Also I recognize I'm in an extreme minority among authors, almost all of whom have day jobs and/or side gigs and/or partners or families whose financial situations offer them support. This is the same for most creative professions. The arts of any sort are a tough gig.
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
2010 was the year I could live entirely off income from books, that income being advances and royalties. That was 10 years after my first book came out and 5 years after my first novel. Prior to that freelancing and corporate writing paid my bills (and my wife's income was our safety margin). It helps I'm a bestselling author and I release a novel a year, so the income is relatively steady.
Boosted by jwz:
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
So Ford holds the record for shortest interval between assassination attempts. But Trump and Reagan almost certainly hold the record for presidential assassination attempts in closest geographic proximity to one another.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
encthenet@flyovercountry.social ("John-Mark Gurney") wrote:
I'm seeing some weird behavior with FastAPI and async.
I have a function:
```
async def foo(r=[]):
if r: return r[0]
r.append(someobj())
return r[0]
```Now I have that declared on a route via the usual:
```
@router.get('/somepage')
async def get_somepage(foo : Annotated[someobj, Depends(foo)]):
xxx
```But in the foo function, I print the id of the r list, and each time somepage is fetched, the list is different.
I did finally just move r into the module name space, and that fixed things. But it's pretty clear that FastAPI is doing something wonky with function calls.
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
Rob_T_Firefly@masto.hackers.town ("Rob Vincent 🎙️") wrote:
"A Tribute to Attribution" - Chainsawsuit by Kris Straub, November 23, 2011. (15 years later, even in the Fediverse, some folks out there are still like this.)
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
NorthBayPython@social.northbaypython.org ("North Bay Python") wrote:
#NBPy 2026 ran at a loss this year. It's a public service and we'll be back in 2027, but we could use your help closing the budget gap.
Donate at https://nbpy.link/donate
Boosted by jwz:
piquant00@mastodon.online ("Ann K.") wrote:
This one takes the cake. 🍰
#USpol
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
You know what's infuriating? Cleaning spring thyme leaves off it's thin, fragile stems!!! #cooking
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
CAT DRAMA
And that's a wrap for the talks! Thank you for bearing with me for this liveblogging experiment; I hope I got those edits to add the hashtags in quickly enough that those of you filtering were not spammed :). #NBPy
*YOU CANNOT CONTRIBUTE IF YOU NEVER REST*
(emphasis mine)