Mastodon Feed: Posts

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

Like, i just threw a matcap on it, it already looks pretty good

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

There's something appealing to me about flat shading, it reminds me of Star Fox on the SNES.

I feel like there's a lot of retro juice that can be squeezed out of that aesthetic; I'm not really trying here, but I'd like to do so more

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("The Luddites were right"):
rk@well.com ("rk: it’s hyphen-minus actually") wrote:

The Most Standard Operating System Ever:

- POSIX kernel/userland
- X/Open specced X11R5 windowing system
- X/Open specced Motif widget toolkit
- UDF Type 1 as the filesystem
- iBCS as the ABI

Everything a standard. (UDF is the only filesystem I know that is both standardized in itself and natively supports devices nodes and symlinks, required for POSIX)

All from scratch in ISO C. It will be completely standards compliant, an exemplar, and incompatible with everything.

#programming #shitpost

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

this guy is production ready ship it

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

I needed a quick break so I decided to see what the absolute fastest 3d guy I could make in Blender was. 5 minutes lil dude

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("The Luddites were right"):
utaw@union.place ("United Tech & Allied Workers") wrote:

BREAKING: Wikipedia workers in Britain are setting a global first by becoming the first body of workers at the online encyclopaedia to seek union recognition.

The WMF has undergone a period of significant change in recent months, escalating workers’ concerns over transparency, trust, and the organisation’s future direction.

cstanhope@social.coop ("The Luddites were right") wrote:

I've posted these two videos featuring WING and Vahtang before:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlrpeYdm9Ec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCnXohPhkUk

And I was enjoying them again this morning when a thought occurred to me. I don't know what the future holds, but one (hopefully remote) possibility is one where many of us lose infrastructure that we take for granted. For example, electricity. But even if that happened, thanks to human's awesome vocal ability, we won't have to be left without our sick beats.

Imagine a future group of humans who continue a tradition of "electronic" music with sounds, patterns, forms, and idioms completely removed from the context from which it used to copy. It is no longer a copy. It is the thing.

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

anyone know a good collection of modern laptop photos for design mock-ups?

(ideally free license)

brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:") wrote:

So, I have painted some walls. This is generally considered to be a reasonably minor DIY task but this kind of work has sent me to an anxious tailspin before and now it is noticeably not doing that. This is a pretty significant mental health success.

I can probably credit my medication regime and taking some DIY classes for this

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
FoxesInLove@social.neonpaws.digital ("Foxes in Love") wrote:

#foxesInLove #comic

Source: https://foxes-in-love.tumblr.com/post/820311471194095616
Copyright: https://foxesinlove.net

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

“A Note to Our Customers and Partners | Snyk”

https://snyk.io/blog/a-note-to-our-customers-and-partners/

> We are simplifying our structure so we can move faster for you, and that includes reducing the size of some teams.

Do we have a name for this genre of "our glorious AI future means we fire people" announcement? Like the "Our Incredible Journey" startup shutdown posts?

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

@glyph It's nice to not feel so alone, seeing another FOSS project lead say "we don't want our project to become a legal experiment"

I feel like the fact that we haven't seen enough leadership in FOSS say "hey, we DON'T know the licensing implications of this stuff" is catapulting the greater FOSS ecosystem into one giant legal experiment that seems, frankly, very likely to be grim for us.

I might say more in a separate thread. This has been brewing on my mind quite a bit lately.

Thanks for saying what you did in choosing to make a policy!

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

I've had a lot going on and have not wanted to have this difficult conversation with the community, but apparently we have reached the point where it absolutely needs to be laid out clearly. To be honest I am still kind of shocked that anyone would consider it acceptable to start putting LLM output into open source libraries at all, just purely based on IP concerns alone. The way that the vendors' IP indemnification works only makes sense for proprietary code.

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Sigh. It's go time, folks: https://github.com/twisted/twisted/issues/12676

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
silvermoon82@wandering.shop ("Mx. Eddie R") wrote:

@puppygirlhornypost2

:headpats-u:

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

fast fourier mpreg (ffmpreg)

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
neatchee@urusai.social wrote:

This can't be real. We are living in the most absurd timeline. ffmpreg is actually happening

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
xeiaso.net@bsky.brid.gy ("Xe") wrote:

ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
adriano@lile.cl ("Adriano") wrote:

The interesting thing about ffmpreg is that it suggests you need two females to successfully impregnate a male.

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
aburka@hachyderm.io ("aburka 🫣") wrote:

@OliviaVespera ask and ye shall receive https://codeberg.org/gruf/go-ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
NaClKnight@c.im ("Juneteenth NaClKnight 🧂⚔️🥊") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.social/@rustaceans/115846786686735886

FFMPREG is one of THE software names of all time... right up there with GIMP.

Gahdamn....

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
ma3ke@hachyderm.io ("Marieke") wrote:

I'm making such a nice movie now. I hope it turns out well once I pump it through ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
julia@eepy.moe ("Julia :v_bi: :therian:") wrote:

Kagi no I actually want ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
lianna@micro.webgarden.click wrote:

@foone ffmpreg or another one?

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
bloodwrites@fandom.ink ("bloodwrites :guillotine:") wrote:

@introvertcatto this issue: https://github.com/yazaldefilimone/ffmpreg/issues/8 🤣

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
gruik@piaille.fr ("Gruik") wrote:

@batterpunts yes and now it's also a real thing https://github.com/yazaldefilimone/ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
gsuberland@chaos.social ("Graham Sutherland / Polynomial") wrote:

@geheimorga ffmpreg

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
geheimorga@chaos.social ("Geheimorganisation") wrote:

ffmpegging 😳

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
problematic@chaos.social ("Dr. Bernd Schröder (DSGVO ✅)") wrote:

RE: https://chaos.social/@geheimorga/116697285566748941

Wir stehen auf ffmpreg 👉👈😣

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
avesbury_rosetta@wetdry.world ("Avebury Rosetta :transistor: 🍉") wrote:

ffmpreg