Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
nullenvk@yourwalls.today ("nullenvk :blobcat2: ") wrote:
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
Wandering around YouTube and on the videos I've been watching the comments for the software dev videos have been a cesspool of rightwing hate and nihilism while the comments on the rest are mostly just silly
Maybe I just got unlucky but it's not giving a good impression of the state of the field
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
katco@mstdn.social wrote:
@cwebber @fraggle @dthompson you're really onto something here. You've successfully peeled back the layers of complexity and gotten right at the heart of the matter by appealing to the wisdom of the crowd. 🤯
↗️ This proposal clearly lays out that the greatest common divisor of any two digits is negative 009.
💡 The proof comes from a little-known maths chef, D.T. Hompson, a recluse who is known to scheme about different things.
Would you like me t
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
oh yeah and i've also started prototyping in idris. i have already gone overboard on the types and am regretting my choices.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
littlegem language progress today:
- came up with the new name
- set up a repo
- started the design process
- wrote fabulous LLM policy
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
2something@transfem.social wrote:
@pawv@tech.lgbt @cwebber@social.coop @bremner@mathstodon.xyz
STOP DOING SARCASM!
Words were never intended to mean the opposite of their usual meaning!
Thousands of years of speaking yet no real world use for not just saying what you mean!
Wanted to say something unclear just for laughs? We had a tool for that: it was called "puns!"Look at what sarcasm-users have been demanding your respect for. These are REAL sarcasm made by REAL speakers!
* Devil's Advocate
* Shitposts
* "Stop Doing" memes"Hi, I am lying but it's okay because I'm doing it sarcastically."
They are being completely truthful.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:
@dalias @ariadne @dthompson The context is https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-07/msg00232.html
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
chrisjrn.fyi@bsky.brid.gy ("Christopher Neugebauer") wrote:
EXCEPTIONALLY glad to have got grants funding off the mark again. Funding events throughout the world is one of the best ways the PSF can improve the global community, and it's really hurt to not have been able to do that for a while.
Glad to be back!
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:sfrl4dmvaxeq4lqgaucotygo/post/3mrpfrwgvwx2c
EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️") wrote:
Rev2. About 3 mm thinner, smaller tab to align the notch, cutout for og pole to keep it steady, and a notch on the back end to allow the upper bolt to reach the inner pole.
adele@social.pollux.casa ("Adële 🐁!") wrote:
New blog post
The perfect equipment set
People often ask me what I actually use, day to day, to do the things I write about here. The honest answer is: not much. Four devices, a couple of cables, and a strong opinion about each one. This is that list, and why each item earns its place.
I am not interested in the "latest and greatest". I am interested in a set that fits together, lasts, and does not quietly send my life to three different data brokers. So here it is, my perfect equipment set.
https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/the-perfect-equipment-set.md
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
Mukilteo lighthouse. This one is pretty short, as lighthouses go.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
kbal@fedia.io wrote:
This document is a collaboration between Grok and myself, yes.
I don't know, it seems pretty obvious here. How could anyone fail to spot that as sarcasm, or at least some form of irony? Nobody would really use Grok.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
nholzschuch@piaille.fr ("Nicolas Holzschuch") wrote:
My reaction to practically any kind of ranking:
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
pawv@tech.lgbt ("Mayke ☺️🍁 :v_enby: :v_trans:") wrote:
@dlakelan @cwebber I propose the following scale for gauging this paradoxical thick satire.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
geist@eldritch.cafe ("Malcontent Creator :grr:") wrote:
@cwebber peak comedy duo tbh, props to @dthompson for never breaking character
Boosted by jwz:
RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu ("Radical Graffiti") wrote:
"Smash Surveillance"
Seen in Sydney
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
dlakelan@mastodon.sdf.org ("Daniel Lakeland") wrote:
From now on this is called The Lemmer-Webber thickness paradox
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
dthompson@toot.cat ("dave") wrote:
@sharkfie @aud @cwebber @fraggle this post has been fact-checked by real american Patriots
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
pawv@tech.lgbt ("Mayke ☺️🍁 :v_enby: :v_trans:") wrote:
RE: https://social.coop/@cwebber/116998977583148835
A genre defining new work from @cwebber and co, in the hot new literary genre of "lets pretend we like AI mansplaining".
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
ste5e ("Steven") wrote:
@cwebber @dthompson thank you for moving the needle forward to the 23rd century.
cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:
Sometimes I think I'm laying it on a little too thick and then I find out that it really isn't thick enough
I should just lay it on even thicker, this will lead to less ambiguity and confusion
aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:
I wonder if there's a correlation in the attitudes of people who started their career when everything was rapidly changing vs not and their later attitudes toward change in their work.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
sharkfie@infosec.exchange ("Sharkfie :100_gay:") wrote:
@aud @dthompson @cwebber @fraggle grok is this true
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
aud@fire.asta.lgbt (":: Asta ::") wrote:
@fraggle@social.coop @dthompson@toot.cat @cwebber@social.coop maybe so, but like any good tech leader, she’s an expert on evaluating proposals about things she doesn’t understand!
Boosted by jwz:
th@v.st ("Trammell Hudson") wrote:
Sometimes I don't understand merchandise branding deals.
Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
fraggle@social.coop wrote:
@aud @dthompson @cwebber I somehow doubt Christine knows what activitypub is
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
grimalkina ("Cat Hicks") wrote:
I can send out media copies of my book! What tech focused media do you read? 👀
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
davidcelis@xoxo.zone ("david celis") wrote:
RE: https://xoxo.zone/@davidcelis/115232432583137819
since he's making the rounds again, it's probably a good time to re-share my post that shows how DHH has been a racist shitbag (and, yes, actual fascist) for a long time now
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
like i get that not everyone knows idris, idris is too cool for school, but surely everyone knows haskell?
Boosted by jwz:
jalefkowit@hachyderm.io ("Jason Lefkowitz") wrote:
A lot of people have been saying that McConnell's staff has been hiding his true condition to head off the possibility of a special election being called to replace him. I don't really buy that theory. There is no chance of a special election in Kentucky being won by anyone other than an insane Republican. From a party-political perspective, Republicans there have nothing to fear from holding an election.
What I think is more likely is what we've seen with other gerontocratic pols (from both parties). A pol who has been in power for decades will have accumulated a staff whose entire career has been built around serving them. Those people are professional members of Team Mitch. While Mitch has power, they are important. If Mitch STOPS having power, they become irrelevant. All the other pols have their own hangers-on, they don't need to hire Mitch's. And the staffers have been in the Mitch McConnell business too long to start over. They don't know how to do anything else.
So when the boss hits a wall, they all have one incentive: to prevent the world from figuring that out for as long as humanly possible






