Boosted by pixxl:
robpike@cosocial.ca ("@robpike.io") wrote:
We don't know for sure yet whether the AI business model will lead to consciousness, but we know for a fact that it creates insanity.
Boosted by pixxl:
robpike@cosocial.ca ("@robpike.io") wrote:
We don't know for sure yet whether the AI business model will lead to consciousness, but we know for a fact that it creates insanity.
Capitalism is one possible machine for achieving this perverse outcome, but authoritarian planned economies can do it faster and with fewer opportunities for interruption. The problem is authoritarian control and the problem with western political discourse is that everybody worried about “communism” (which they understand to be “unchecked secular authoritarian autocracy”) cannot understand that the predictable concentration of power that capitalism creates is the same thing with extra steps
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@Hex/117257581151346827
I agree with this take and I mostly agree with hex’s politics, but this is becoming a pet peeve: “destructive optimization of meaningless metrics in service of pleasing an authority distant from material reality” is not “capitalism”. Read “Mao’s Great Famine” if you want to see someone build this exact machine for national and ideological pride rather than profit maximization.
Right now we need to move very far left but we must not delude ourselves that left politics are incorruptible.
neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:") wrote:
They sure love the taste of those boots.
Boosted by pixxl:
thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io ("Thomas Fuchs ") wrote:
@misty funnily enough a lot of programmers these days use a line editor, it just usually involves yelling at a chatbot and a lot of matrix multiplication
Boosted by pixxl:
patigallardo.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy ("Patricia Aas 🐢🏳️🌈") wrote:
This collective LLM delusion is completely baffling to me. People are talking like truth, correctness, precision, performance, security… none of it matters anymore. Generating a lie is «good enough».
Wtf is wrong with people?
If correctness doesn’t matter, why would I pay you?
A wrong answer is free
pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:
Pretty dancer.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/09/13/our-kitchen-helper/
Boosted by pixxl:
ljwrites@writeout.ink ("L.J., romantic toiler") wrote:
Put simply, translators must not cede a single inch of ground to machine translation. #Translation is an art, not a merely utilitarian tool or necessary evil, and as such it is filled with choice and interpretation and subjectivity and craft and all the other things that make us human. AI-produced versions are not “translating” in any meaningful way so much as stealing and repackaging past human work, all while contributing to the false notion that objective translation is possible. What makes translation *interesting* is the human choice that has gone into it, and I do not want to spend one moment of my precious human life contemplating the “choices” an LLM has made . . .
– Stephanie McCarter, Choosing Humanity, Art, and Translation https://pasts-imperfect.ghost.io/pasts-imperfect-8-27-26/
chipotle@mstdn.social ("Watts Martin") wrote:
My Apple Watch’s battery is fading, and for the first time in years I’m considering going back to my long-ignored mechanical watch and a $99 FitBit Air.
NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈") wrote:
@vi_mi that’s what I thought too! But it does not pass. And I spent hours debugging the issue. (Which occurred in much more complicated code, not this minimized example.) I was really confused because all of the docs for LazyLock say it should work as I expected.
Want to wager a guess at why it fails? Or should I just share the answer?
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
“Abdicati | blarg”
https://exple.tive.org/blarg/2026/09/12/abdicati/
> I can’t begin tell you how tired I am of people anthropomorphizing AI in a way that lets OpenAI and its employees straight up confess to committing crimes on stage, in front of an audience full of people who should absolutely know better who are all just nodding along, applauding their own humiliation.
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
“The Nonfiction Book Market is Collapsing - by Sean deLone”
https://dearheadofmine.substack.com/p/the-nonfiction-book-market-is-collapsing
> Two weeks ago, the entire hardcover nonfiction bestseller list sold 42,000 copies, whereas just the top two bestselling fiction hardcovers the same week—The Calamity Club in its 15th week on-sale and Yesteryear in its 19th week on-sale—sold 52,000 copies
I've not been keeping up with publishing news so this ongoing collapse in non-fiction was news to me.
Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
Lazarou ("Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈") wrote:
I assure you, we're more upset about this than any 'United Ireland' nonsense from Trump, protecting nonces is a big fucking deal.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/us-diplomat-london-children-indecent-37656866
pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:
Aww, the TPUSA professor watchlist has been taken down.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/09/13/oh-no-ive-been-erased-from-history/
jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
good morning
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:
This is a valid position to take on AI/LLMs: https://ploum.net/2026-09-09-ai%5Fpolicy.html
Most folks on Fedi will probably agree with it wholeheartedly.
brennan@social.lol ("Brennan Kenneth Brown") wrote:
There is so much to love and celebrate. Reclaim joy. Be open. Forgive.
https://brennan.day/there-is-so-much-to-love-and-celebrate-reclaim-joy-be-open-forgive/
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Sure, "AI" might kill us all, but it's rather more likely that the folks running "AI" companies are hyping up that fear in order to have their pet legislators introduce bills that advantage their positions while kneecapping their competitors and to give them a little more runway to figure out how to avoid the coming massive economic collapse they are still in the process of creating. The apocalypse is far more likely to be caused by the tech CEOs than their spicy autocorrect programs.
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
CyReVolt ("지지 ᚠד (Jiji Freya Daniel) 🐢✨🧡") wrote:
The next International #Workshop on Plan 9 🔧🐇 will take place in Prague at Czech Technical University (CTU/ČVUT), from May 13-16 2027.
We are calling for participation, with a scope covering the Plan 9 operating system and related ones, applications connecting to/integrating with Plan 9, system architecture, services and development, as well as file systems.
For more, see https://iwp9.org/ 👈
jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:
Today is the 28th anniversary of my blog, Whatever, and also, the 20th anniversary of my most viral post ever: Bacon cat!
https://whatever.scalzi.com/2026/09/13/bacon-cat-20-year-anniversary-28-years-of-whatever/
Tech fetishism, the ascription of human agentive powers to machinery, is always a political act. It obscures that the goals, the purposes, embodied in any technology are human purposes; more specifically, that they are the automated purposes of a minute subset of humanity, a class fraction, the twisted, ruthless, ketamined, indoctrinated, emotionally stunted moral nullities that rule Silicon Valley like child-kings, have made themselves the bearers of myriad impossible hopes, and have now bought their way into the Trump court. It says, that’s just how the technology works, it’s a capricious demigod which can either shower us with riches or have us all killed, we must appease it and ensnare it, we must fear it and cherish it, but what we mustn’t ever do is stop throwing money at it, or stop genuflecting to it, or begin to think: this is nothing but our own alienated collective power turned against us by cut-throat capitalists, and in making us the servants of their technology, they try to make us their slaves.
https://www.patreon.com/richardseymourwtf/posts/kill-all-humans-169276703
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
patigallardo.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy ("Patricia Aas 🐢🏳️🌈") wrote:
I can’t believe we have 4 years of experience with AI psychosis and still most people are just pretending it isn’t happening.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jpoesen@social.jpoesen.com ("jpoesen | 🇪🇺 | 🏳️🌈") wrote:
Robert Paxton lays out 5 stages of fascism.
DHH's "Omarchy Doctrine" completes Stage 1.
https://www.flyingpenguin.com/dhh-omarchy-doctrine-fascism-stage-one-by-definition/
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
timnitGebru@dair-community.social ("Timnit Gebru (she/her).") wrote:
Twitter is TESCREAL social media (for obvious reasons), which helps me see their talking points
1. Anyone pushing "stochastic parrots framing" shouldn't be taken seriously.
2. People "denying" the machine god narrative, like me, are akin to anti-vaxxers & climate deniers.
These are things they're saying to the left politicians they've captured, like Bernie Sanders who's being advised on "AI" by eugenicist doomsday cult leaders.
I wish we really were in a simulation like this people say 🙄
Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
libreoffice@fosstodon.org ("LibreOffice") wrote:
Yes, no (built-in) AI is now a feature
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/09/03/yes-no-ai-is-now-a-feature/
Boosted by krig@goto.liten.app:
aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place wrote:
oh, i spotted some heart warming #vandalism while out and about earlier today #neverslop
Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
pikesley@mastodon.me.uk ("Chamfered Tetrahedron") wrote:
I may have just danced around my kitchen
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
oh right, turns out i finished porting that one yesterday
Boosted by andrewnez ("Andrew Nesbitt"):
mikemcquaid ("Mike McQuaid") wrote:
Today, I’m proud to announce Homebrew 7.0.0.
The most significant changes since 6.0.0 are faster installations, stronger sandboxing, native macOS app, vulnerability checks, advisory database, end of macOS 10.15 support and Intel Macs to Tier 3.
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
lrhodes@merveilles.town ("⁂ L. Rhodes") wrote:
"To me, Rocketship exemplified the ways in which […] these technologies and associated practices served to reinforce regimes of surveillance and control, utterly dehumanizing students as it datafied them."
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/click-here-to-comply/Part of the problem, I think, is that some otherwise well-meaning people genuinely don't know how to distinguish between engagement and control when it comes to dealing with children, in part because they don't fully recognize the humanity of children.