Mastodon Feed: Posts

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

we regret that you formalised it.

Boosted by cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber"):
vv@solarpunk.moe ("princess bubblegum 💫") wrote:

Patience is such a cool concept for an LFO and it needs some more backers to be funded!

I love the idea of a locking eurorack module

Like, look at this cool backplate

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/olivia-artz-modular/patience-for-eurorack

#Eurorack #ModularSynthesizer #modular #lfo #kickstarter #synths #module

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

on the fruit tier list, we're all clear that apple is at the bottom, right? possibly except for conference pear?

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i am begging corporations to at least grasp the irony of complaining about scraper bots while pursuing AI bullshit.

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
evacide@hachyderm.io wrote:

Just remember that when you opt into allowing Apple to use your customer data to train AI, that means humans seeing and hearing details about your life that maybe you're not so comfortable sharing when you think of it that way.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/09/14/apple-has-altered-course-on-using-customer-data-to-train-its-ai

cwebber@social.coop ("Christine Lemmer-Webber") wrote:

A eurorack module? Or a meditative art piece on the nature of time and the inevitability of death?

Well, why not both? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/olivia-artz-modular/patience-for-eurorack

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
MaddieM4@raphus.social wrote:

I've given plenty of people grief for having inconsistent beliefs, but lately, I'm not sure that this is a smart or reasonable thing to criticize people for.

When I'm working on a complex codebase with a lot of existing/institutional weight, and I want to make a significant change for the better, I have to introduce temporary inconsistency in order to have the new coexist with the old, until the new can take over. Depending on the scope of the change, this transitional state can last a long time. As a failure mode, it can be indefinite 😅 But if you don't want the codebase to be forever crystallized as The Thing It Was In 2015, the price of change is transitional hypocrisy.

I think this applies to people too, and is a reason that online discourse tends to be so consistent at polarizing people and entrenching beliefs. We are constantly rounding people to their nearest official party, which is not necessarily a good thing for freedom of ideological motion, particularly for persuading people leftward.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

toposphere

Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
birming@social.lol ("Robert Birming") wrote:

Added a status page to my @goodenough Pika blog, so now I have @neatnik status.lol for short updates and some.pics for photos 🥳

https://birming.com/status

#blogging #indieweb

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

this project exists permanently under a rock and it would be disingenuous of you to point out what's happening the other side of the rock

Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
jmock@social.lol ("Jim Mock") wrote:

Holy crap, Jimothy arrived today! 🦝 @robb, THIS IS AMAZING! THANK YOU!

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
ghickman ("George Hickman") wrote:

I have some availability coming up for client work!

I specialise in building web applications with Django and bring over 15 years of Python experience. I've worked on projects and with teams of all sizes.

Whether it's turning prototypes into production-ready systems or wrangling your LLMs, I can help.

If you think I can help you, let’s have a chat 😊

Boosts appreciated!

#python #django #fedihired #freelance

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

users want more features faster.

believe me, they want the features it has to actually fucking work.

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
celesteh@hachyderm.io ("Charles :trans: , fuck all GenAI") wrote:

Sneak preview of organ grinding: https://v.basspistol.org/w/vkWxqnw4khSjFfJmHUxbv5

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i do rather firmly believe that in the end, we'll find that there's a lot more quality software written by humans than bots.

but wait, you don't even need to trust me on that because you've already seen it's true.

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart :ifin:") wrote:

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/117275354970016643

I didn't add a "What you can do" section to this piece because for most folks, the best thing you can do is not believe these charlatans.

But if you're in a position where you must use or build with these tools, I implore you to build in such a way that their disappearance is not catastrophic. They should never be critical junctures in any workflow.

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

Of course, not having fame also means the harm I caused with every misstep was not amplified.

Perhaps, like extreme material wealth, extreme fame is not something that should exist. Relative obscurity for all, I say!

cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen") wrote:

I sometimes stop and feel gratitude that I neither desired nor accidentally acquired fame as it has allowed me to develop and grow as a person in private. I'd hate to have every misstep I previously made paraded to the world every time I made a positive change.

jscalzi@threads.net ("John Scalzi") wrote:

I literally had not heard it until last Friday, and then I heard it twice

RE: https://www.threads.com/@julesxmw/post/DdSozSqEb%5Fg

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place wrote:

since everyone is taking about breaking off from the free slopware movement to start our own "what if we had principles this time" software movement, i think we gotta come up with a cool name for people to rally around. i propose we call it "okiedokie software"

brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:") wrote:

the spoons are metaphorical but it also works literally

Boosted by pixxl:
eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Eniko Fox") wrote:

it's interesting everyone seems to be assuming i'm talking about games but i'm actually talking about anything. blog posts with AI header images, youtube videos with AI images or thumbnails, books with AI covers, music with AI cover art, etc

but yes also games

Boosted by pixxl:
eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Eniko Fox") wrote:

putting a little AI generated stuff in your work is like putting a little sewage in a drink: now the whole thing is sewage

brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:") wrote:

fuckkk i burned all my spoons before making dinner

Boosted by pixxl:
eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place ("Eniko Fox") wrote:

"why are people so upset that i used AI for a throwaway image that's just a tiny part of a much larger work"

because if you used AI for that they cannot know what else you used AI for and so they cannot know if they can trust the core of your content and its message

hope that helps

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:") wrote:

@yassie_j Now on the Web Archive!

https://web.archive.org/web/20260915185024/https://www.jkrowling.com/faqs/

braces for legal threats

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

when someone does something like that it's just very revealing of who they are

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

yeah, sorry, there are certain slurs that you do not get to apply to others, no matter what horrible things they've done

Boosted by ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)"):
ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

@xssfox right?? not even close.

Boosted by ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)"):
xssfox@cloudisland.nz ("xssfox (crossy)") wrote:

Maybe I've been sheltered from this due to my specific jobs/roles but I've seen a few people suggesting that "AI has removed the most time consuming part of software development, coding" and I have never felt like coding was ever the time consuming part.