Mastodon Feed
Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
mattbarnardsays@hcommons.social ("Matthew J. Barnard🤔ðŸ’") wrote:
Top tier scampery from computer scientists here:
"Gutmann's argument is simple: to this day, quantum computers – which he regards as "physics experiments" rather than pending products – haven't managed to factor any number greater than 21 without cheating."
Quantum code breaking? You'd get further with an 8-bit computer, an abacus, and a dog | https://go.theregister.com/i/cfa/https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/17/quantum%5Fcryptanalysis%5Fcriticism/