Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
stepheneb@ruby.social ("Stephen Bannasch (316 ppm)") wrote:
I think it’s hilarious that the archive also archived the subpoena to Tucows which had this boilerplate!
https://archive.is/2025.11.06-145859/https://pdflink.to/1e0e0ecd/?ref=404media.co
“YOUR COMPANY IS REQUIRED TO FURNISH THIS INFORMATION.
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE OF THIS SUBPOENA INDEFINITELY AS ANY SUCH DISCLOSURE COULD INTERFERE WITH AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW.”