
Boosted by mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze"):
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
@RandomDamage @scotclose Yes it absolutely would be, if it were intended for protecting classified information. Systems designed for classified communication don't allow this kind of mistake.
People seem to want to hype up Signal at all costs for some reason, but it's simply not suitable for protecting classified material. Nor is it designed to be.