Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online ("Teri Kanefield") wrote:
John Eastman sounds worried. Apparently he's writing a letter to DOJ Special Counsel explaining that there was no crime in writing his memo. (There very well could be a crime, yup.)
He's making a big deal of the fact that he didn't get a target letter, but there is no rule that targets have to get letters.
Lots of people get indicted without target letters.
Does anyone want a refresher about the Eastman Memo? I wrote up some analysis for the Washington Post on that a few years ago . . .
1/