Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
zachleat@zachleat.com ("Zach Leatherman :11ty:") wrote:
It should be fair to post screenshots like this for companies that tout “the fastest frontends” on their home page—especially notable that this is *not* a temporary regression. It’s been like this for a long time—why is no one talking about it?
Attachments:
- Pagespeed insights for vercel.com, Core Web Vitals: failed LCP 3.1s (average) INP 862ms (slow) CLS 0s (fast) FCP 2.8s (average) FID 152ms (average) TTFB 0.8s (average) Lighthouse: 28 Performance (bad) 96 Accessibility 96 Best Practices 100 SEO FCP 5.4s (slow) LCP 12.2s (slow) TBT 6970ms (slow) CLS 0ms Speed Index 7.8s (slow) (remote)