Boosted by jwz:
sstephenson@indieweb.social ("Sam Stephenson") wrote:
This issue has it all!
- Original copyright holder makes a straightforward claim of violation
- Sloppers try to defend it using the Oracle v Google ruling
- Armin “Plausibly Deniable” Ronacher shows up to do nothing but sow doubt
- Maintainer in question replies with a response obviously written by Claude, saying he instructed Claude not to reference any copyrighted code