Mastodon Feed
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
But, four years later there are indictions that this might end up partially panning out as tools for discovering and reporting security vulnerabilities
I'd be very careful in trusting these anecdotal reports
We're still in a bubble. With the money involved people have a strong incentive to believe. Other people have a strong incentive to mislead. That is a dangerous combo. We don't know what went into these "AI" security reports or how many false positives or negatives they generated