
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So three things can be true at once:
1.) reducing collection can help, and in the short run it can disrupt some of the worst collectors and creepiest re-identification.
2.) reducing collection is not a replacement for privacy laws and will be long-term ineffective in *exactly* the ways Apple's blog post gets SO CLOSE to understanding.
3.) any firm that says "privacy is a human right" but only makes devices for the rich is *lying*