slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
There's an easy, cheap, and sort of glib critique going around, most easily captured in the "Abundance" debate, in which I find myself loathing both sides.
Yes, *obviously* we must find a way to push past sclerotic letter-of-the-law legalism to build more and better in ways that improve the material circumstances of folks. But the avatars of that argument aren't covering themselves in humility re: how to get what we need more of.
Liberalism must be a learning organism.