slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
This (charter document-based) understanding of the proper roles of WGs and CGs will likely also be unpopular with the management staff of SDOs, as it's Working Groups, not CGs, that bring in membership dues.
There's an instinct, as a result, to venerate WGs as the source of ideas, and diviners of feature readiness. This is silly and self-destructive.
The only test that matters is the market, and the best ideas come from conversations between web developers and browser engineers.