Mastodon Feed
Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dshinkle@esq.social ("Danl") wrote:
@Teri_Kanefield I can't figure out the ethics of dual representation. If clients stay in perfect alignment, no problem. But if Client A decides to testify against Clients B and C, obviously A needs new counsel, but if I have discussed the merits with A, and I have secrets from A, I'm going to have trouble continuing with B and C, especially when they, inevitably, start giving me dirt about A. How does this ever work out?