cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
I was reading this summary of a paper from Apple on the limitations of LLMs:
And I got to this from the author of the post.
"The vision of AGI I have always had is one that combines the strengths of humans with the strength of machines, overcoming the weaknesses of humans. I am not interested in a “AGI” that can’t do arithmetic, and I certainly wouldn’t want to entrust global infrastructure or the future of humanity to such a system."
Which got me thinking...