Mastodon Feed
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
PSA to datetime library authors!
"Local" time zone should never be assumed implicitly! If you must support something like naked "2023-10-27", create a naive date object and either require a time zone along with it when you need one, or if you have to assume, assume UTC. There's only one UTC, and there are 38 local ones. See the problem?