Boosted by taral ("JP Sugarbroad"):
tomgag@infosec.exchange ("Tommaso Gagliardoni") wrote:
"Unfortunately We Are Unable To Provide Feedback"
No, you're not "unable", you are unwilling. And this is not OK.
https://gagliardoni.net/#20251227%5Fnofeedback
Many cybersecurity and Web3 conferences refuse to provide an explanation of why a submission was rejected. The argument is that it would be too much time consuming due to the large volume of applications, but in this blog post (which is both a rant and an open letter) I make the point that this is just an excuse, and it's due time to change this behavior. It's not only a lack of respect for the community, but also a red flag about the transparency of the review process.
Please be better than this.