Mastodon Feed
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
S-Config@core.s-config.com wrote:
@soatok "No" is also Ecologically friendly. as it take maybe 1 packet to say "No." and not an endless CPU cryptographic reach-around to tickle the users balls because you refuse to accept "No." and instead put a "Maybe later." increasing energy usage for everyone.
See, this is why I can't be a speaker at these events.